Time for the resignation of BA's CEO

Old Sep 8, 2018, 8:35 am
  #91  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 629
Originally Posted by UKtravelbear


The maximum fine under GDPR is €20m or 4% of global turnover. The UK Information Commissioner will assess the fine based on not only how serious the breach is but also how BA dealt with the breach. Any actual fines are well down the road at present.

In the U.K. fines go to the Treasury who sometimes do allocate it to charitable causes but that is quite rare. I recall some banking fines have been spent this way but that was unusual.

None of the fine will be paid to any of those affected BA may offer those affected a goodwill gesture - some avios or Ł off of future flight.

In addition to the fine BA has promised to reimburse people if there are any fraudulent transactions on their cards plus of course there will be internal costs for dealing with the breach. And in the short to medium term there may be a loss of revenue if people don’t book future flights (but then again how many people have said ‘never flying BA again’ yet do once there is a sale on.

So all in all this has the potential to cost BA a lot of money.
20m or 4% of global turnover - whichever is greater
secretplantofightinflation is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2018, 8:51 am
  #92  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,477
I can not believe the title is changed. Do we need to be political correct to even participate in the forum now?
FlyerTalker688786 is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2018, 8:57 am
  #93  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,197
Originally Posted by dodgeflyer
I don’t understand why people jump to such defence on BA continuously. .
This isn't the first 'lynch mob' thread demanding he be sacked from his job.
HIDDY is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2018, 9:01 am
  #94  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Programs: AC MM E50 , Former SPG, now Marriott LT Plat
Posts: 6,250
Originally Posted by chongcao
I can not believe the title is changed. Do we need to be political correct to even participate in the forum now?
I thought it was to remove the ambiguity concerning Air Canada.
IluvSQ is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2018, 9:03 am
  #95  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dubai , UAE and Leeds, UK
Programs: Etihad Guest Platinum, BA Bronze, And EK silver
Posts: 161
Can we start a petition to remove this imbecile? He's taking BA to the ground!
den3aah is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2018, 9:07 am
  #96  
Moderator: British Airways Executive Club, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges and Environmentally Friendly Travel
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 22,209
Originally Posted by UKtravelbear


The maximum fine under GDPR is €20m or 4% of global turnover. The UK Information Commissioner will assess the fine based on not only how serious the breach is but also how BA dealt with the breach. Any actual fines are well down the road at present.

In the U.K. fines go to the Treasury who sometimes do allocate it to charitable causes but that is quite rare. I recall some banking fines have been spent this way but that was unusual.

None of the fine will be paid to any of those affected BA may offer those affected a goodwill gesture - some avios or Ł off of future flight.

In addition to the fine BA has promised to reimburse people if there are any fraudulent transactions on their cards plus of course there will be internal costs for dealing with the breach. And in the short to medium term there may be a loss of revenue if people don’t book future flights (but then again how many people have said ‘never flying BA again’ yet do once there is a sale on.

So all in all this has the potential to cost BA a lot of money.
i was reading up on this and what I have learned is that fines under GDPR are not mandatory, rather they are discretionary, must be imposed on a case-by-case basis and must be “effective, proportionate and dissuasive”.
What is the maximum administrative fine under the GDPR?
There are two tiers of administrative fines that can be levied as penalties for non-compliance:

1. Up to €10 million, or 2% annual global turnover – whichever is higher.
2. Up to €20 million, or 4% annual global turnover – whichever is higher.

The administrative fines are discretionary rather than mandatory; they must be imposed on a case-by-case basis and must be “effective, proportionate and dissuasive”.

The fines are based on the specific articles of the Regulation that the organisation has breached. Infringements of the organisation’s obligations, including data security breaches, will be subject to the lower level, whereas infringements of an individual’s privacy rights will be subject to the higher level.

Making sure that your organisation is compliant to the GDPR can reduce the change of incurring an administrate fine.


How are GDPR fines applied?
When deciding whether to impose a fine and the level, the ICO must consider:

* The nature, gravity and duration of the infringement;
* The intentional or negligent character of the infringement;
* Any action taken by the organisation to mitigate the damage suffered by individuals;
* Technical and organisational measures that have been implemented by the organisation;
* Any previous infringements by the organisation or data processor;
* The degree of cooperation with the regulator to remedy the infringement;
* The types of personal data involved;
* The way the regulator found out about the infringement;
* The manner in which the infringement became known to the supervisory authority, in particular whether and to what extent the organisation notified the infringement;
* Whether, and, if so, to what extent, the controller or processor notified the infringement; and
* Adherence to approved codes of conduct or certification schemes.
Source: https://www.itgovernance.co.uk/dpa-and-gdpr-penalties
Prospero is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2018, 9:08 am
  #97  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: OSL
Posts: 2,638
Originally Posted by HIDDY
This isn't the first 'lynch mob' thread demanding he be sacked from his job.
How is this a lynch mob? This is the CEO of a Ł12bn revenue business who’s majorly messed up twice in 16 months within the same area. This is just incompetence.
dodgeflyer is online now  
Old Sep 8, 2018, 9:16 am
  #98  
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Surrey
Programs: BAEC Silver
Posts: 211
There does seem to be a trend in IT cost cutting.
angeloedades likes this.
FrogTastic is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2018, 9:25 am
  #99  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London
Programs: Hilton, IHG - BA, GA, LH, QR, SV, TK
Posts: 17,005
Originally Posted by Prospero


The fines are based on the specific articles of the Regulation that the organisation has breached. Infringements of the organisation’s obligations, including data security breaches, will be subject to the lower level, whereas infringements of an individual’s privacy rights will be subject to the higher level.

Making sure that your organisation is compliant to the GDPR can reduce the change of incurring an administrate fine.

Source: https://www.itgovernance.co.uk/dpa-and-gdpr-penalties
Odd isn't it? You'd think an organisation involved in risk management, security and governance might take the very basic step of proof reading in-house work before publishing it on their website.

After all, awkward grammar and spelling mistakes are the first warning that all might not be well in mails purporting to come from banks, Nigerian princes, James Hillier et al
Prospero, adrianlondon and T8191 like this.
IAN-UK is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2018, 9:26 am
  #100  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brighton. UK
Programs: BA Gold / VS /IHG Diamond & Ambassador
Posts: 14,166
Originally Posted by Prospero
i was reading up on this and what I have learned is that fines under GDPR are not mandatory, rather they are discretionary, must be imposed on a case-by-case basis and must be “effective, proportionate and dissuasive”.
Yes indeed. I was responsive to a post that mentioned the Ł500m potential fine which some appear to believe has already been applied and others that it could mean a payment of Ł1k+ to each of those affected as though it was some US class action suit and it gets divvied up which is not how it works in the UK

I posited elsewhere that I could see BA being fined tens if millions of ŁŁ pour encourager les autres and the ICO will take it's time to (a) investigate and (b) assess the fine in terms of not only the volume and data revealed but also taking into account how BA dealt with it. Of course they have a lot on their plate with several other major breaches recently and as GDPR is still new there is little if any record of what fines have been levied.

And despite what some on here and elsewhere have said BA have been praised for their swift handling of the issue once it became known Computer Weekly and the ICO will take that into account.
Prospero and argonath like this.
UKtravelbear is online now  
Old Sep 8, 2018, 10:02 am
  #101  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Programs: BA GGL, LH FTL
Posts: 3,577
Originally Posted by chongcao
I can not believe the title is changed. Do we need to be political correct to even participate in the forum now?
No, but good manners and old fashioned politeness go a long way.
LCY8737 is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2018, 10:04 am
  #102  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Programs: BA GGL, LH FTL
Posts: 3,577
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
So probably best if we knock all these silly references on the head.
Thank you, cws! It is good to hear the voice of reason coming from you.
LCY8737 is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2018, 10:04 am
  #103  
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,494
Originally Posted by LCY8737


Reading flyertalk one sometimes thinks BA is the worst. Yet they seem to have no problem recruiting staff and filling their planes with paying customers.

they have significant problems keeping staff, and that is usually not a good sign.

as for filling planes, even AZ at the height of its crisis had full planes. Yields matter a lot more.

there is no doubt BA is currently profitable and has been for years on the back of a strong economy. Times of economic challenges will be the acid test of whether this has been due to a sound model or more to favourable economic conjuncture.
orbitmic is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2018, 10:07 am
  #104  
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,494
Originally Posted by UKtravelbear

In the U.K. fines go to the Treasury who sometimes do allocate it to charitable causes but that is quite rare. I recall some banking fines have been spent this way but that was unusual.
i wouldn’t get too excited if I were a charity. Something tells me the treasury needs the money just now!
orbitmic is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2018, 10:08 am
  #105  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Programs: Executive Club: Gold - Flying Blue: Gold
Posts: 1,381
Originally Posted by dodgeflyer
How is this a lynch mob? This is the CEO of a Ł12bn revenue business who’s majorly messed up twice in 16 months within the same area. This is just incompetence.
Alex Cruz has been good to shareholders and awful to customers and employees. Some are happy with that. Some aren’t impressed. And I am not impressed at all as he’s transformed the airline from a good one to a very average one (and I am being very generous). So yes he has to go!
davm666 likes this.
BA6948 is online now  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.