Need receipt from flights 2-3 years ago

Old Aug 22, 2018, 1:34 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Programs: BAEC Gold, LH M&M Member
Posts: 2,705
Originally Posted by groovy_dhruvy
The cost of an upgrade would not meet the ‘necessary’ test where the cost of the lower class ticket was borne by the employer unless there was a medical reason why the employee could not travel in the lower class cabin. The ‘necessary’ test applies to the additional spending in question and not the requirement to travel.


No. The test is whether the travel is necessary, not that the particular class of travel is necessary. This is a direct quote from HMRC;

Fiona has to travel on business. Her employer pays her a travel allowance sufficient for the purchase of a standard class railway ticket. Fiona buys a first class ticket. The allowance paid is taxable but tax relief is available for the full expenditure actually incurred – the cost of the first class ticket.
Originally Posted by groovy_dhruvy
source: am a tax accountant.
Oh.
NeverFirst is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2018, 2:04 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Programs: BA (silver)
Posts: 12
Originally Posted by mmfraser


You have justified why travelling in business class is a valid business expense. I do not see why HMRC would distinguish between who paid what, but that is a personal view. HMRC disallowing certain classes of employees from flying on the same business in a higher cabin is surely some form of discrimination (even though they will be paying a good portion out of their own pocket)?

Indeed the views across the tax profession alone seem to differ following a brief Google search. I guess submitting these claims is to be considered in line with your risk profile.

Apologies in advance for straying a tad off-topic!
Who paid what is key - there are different tax regimes (and thousands of pages of legislation) for each.
groovy_dhruvy is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2018, 2:20 am
  #18  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Programs: BA (silver)
Posts: 12
Originally Posted by mario
I think I meet the "necessary" test since the guide mentions that it has to do with the fact that a trip is required and doesn't mention anything regarding class of travel to meet that requirement.

Additionally, the guidance is clear that HMRC wouldn't consider an expense unreasonable just because a cheaper alternative is available. The guide goes as far as giving an example of an employee who gets reimbursed by the employer for standard class travel and buys a First class ticket, making it clear that the difference is eligible for tax relief.

Also, other people, including c-w-s said in the thread quoted above that they successfully done this.

I've resubmitted my self-assessment for last year as I had those receipts available and will update this thread when I hear more.
You're misinterpreting the manual - it gives an example of an employee who is given a travel allowance and not one who is reimbursed for their travel expenses. The nuance is important. If you receive a flat-rate travel allowance (which is taxable) then any business travel would be deductible because your employer obliges you to pay for it yourself as a necessary cost whilst performing your job. In this case it does not matter how you travel as long as its not frivolous.. That is distinct from the case where an employer pays for your ticket (either upfront or via an expenses reclaim) and you then pay to upgrade.

HMRC's manuals can't cover every scenario. Look at the legislation (ITEPA 2003):

336. Deductions for expenses: the general rule
(1)The general rule is that a deduction from earnings is allowed for an amount if—
(a)the employee is obliged to incur and pay it as holder of the employment, and
(b)the amount is incurred wholly, exclusively and necessarily in the performance of the duties of the employment.
(2)The following provisions of this Chapter contain additional rules allowing deductions for particular kinds of expenses and rules preventing particular kinds of deductions.
(3)No deduction is allowed under this section for an amount that is deductible under sections 337 to 342 (travel expenses).

337Travel in performance of duties
(1)A deduction from earnings is allowed for travel expenses if—
(a)the employee is obliged to incur and pay them as holder of the employment, and
(b)the expenses are necessarily incurred on travelling in the performance of the duties of the employment.
(2)This section needs to be read with section 359 (disallowance of travel expenses: mileage allowances and reliefs).

Unless you were (a) obliged to incur the costs of an upgrade, and (b) the cost was necessary for the performance of your duties, then no deduction is available.
groovy_dhruvy is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2018, 3:04 am
  #19  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,716
Originally Posted by mario
Also, other people, including c-w-s said in the thread quoted above that they successfully done this.
Just to clarify, I'm on self-assessment, and PAYE, however (a) my tax affairs are complex and (b) my claimed upgrades in 2012 would relate to spending against a travel allowance.
groovy_dhruvy likes this.
corporate-wage-slave is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.