Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Access to T5 airside

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 18, 2018, 6:16 am
  #16  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Programs: BA GGL, LH FTL
Posts: 3,578
Originally Posted by NWIFlyer
Indeed, and one of those terms is this:

...
We were discussing a scenario, where the majority opinion seems to be, that according to the T&C no refund is due, which btw seems imminently logical to me and I have not disputed. So we are discussing a double hypothetical scenario, along the lines of "if BA had other ticket rules and somebody were to abuse them".

But for the sake of bringing this line of discussion to a close: If BA felt that this hypothetical scenario constitutes a hypothetical gross misconduct and chooses to hypothetically terminate my membership I will - of course hypothetically - take my business elsewhere.

Now breath everyone. No offence was committed. No kittens were hurt. Not even virtually hypothetically.
Dover2Golf likes this.
LCY8737 is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2018, 6:30 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: LHR
Programs: BAEC Gold, SkyTeam Elite Plus, Sixt Gold
Posts: 418
Originally Posted by NWIFlyer
Has it ever been used? Certainly Lufthansa's version has where they penalised a member who entered the lounge every day, ate and drank, then moved his fully flexible ticket to the next day, time after time - so it is not without precedent, and indeed there are certain similarities with what you're doing in terms of accessing GF. LH, incidentally, won in court when the member challenged the decision.
LOL
The member even went to court for this! Wondering why she/he did it, not for the money evidently. Possibly for the Bohemain spirit that comes with this hustle?
frandrake is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2018, 6:31 am
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London
Programs: Mucci. Nothing else matters.
Posts: 38,644
Originally Posted by LCY8737
We were discussing a scenario, where the majority opinion seems to be, that according to the T&C no refund is due, which btw seems imminently logical to me and I have not disputed. So we are discussing a double hypothetical scenario, along the lines of "if BA had other ticket rules and somebody were to abuse them".
I think that the point is that in theory, you could fall foul of the rule even if you don't claim a refund. So it's not really a double hypothetical; it's more that as a one-off, it won't be worth BA's while taking any action. I rather suspect that when BA does take action against people who then walk off in a huff because they think their dignity has been insulted or whatever, BA is actually heartily glad to see the back of them.
Globaliser is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2018, 6:56 am
  #19  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: UK
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 12,258
Even those Customer Service Champions at John Lewis will ban a p*** taker

Man who said 12 TVs he bought from John Lewis were faulty is banned | Daily Mail Online
mikeyfly is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2018, 7:29 am
  #20  
:D!
Hilton Contributor BadgeIHG Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NW London and NW Sydney
Programs: BA Diamond, Hilton Bronze, A3 Diamond, IHG *G
Posts: 6,344
Strictly speaking isn't the £17.50 RFS a fee charged by BA, and then BA pays any taxes and charges that may be due? So perhaps only those not eligible for RFS who have paid the full charges directly may qualify for refund.

While APD would not be due if not flying, I would say the Heathrow passenger charge should be due since you have passed through LHR security and made use of facilities (at the very least, the train or the escort back to arrivals!)

I don't know if BA would actually have to pay the PSC to Heathrow when one decides not to fly, but I believe the cheapest possible PSC is £19.xx, so BA would lose money although they get to keep the Avios.
:D! is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2018, 7:41 am
  #21  
Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club, easyJet and Ryanair
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK/Las Vegas
Programs: BA Gold (GGL/CCR)
Posts: 15,926
Originally Posted by LCY8737


No expectation in getting anything back, but I would argue that "them ticket rules are them rules" - this works both ways. My relationship with BA is governed by terms and conditions, not by a moral compass.
Sadly a lack of moral compass is what is wrong with so much of the world these days
Tobias-UK is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2018, 7:58 am
  #22  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Programs: BA GGL, LH FTL
Posts: 3,578
Originally Posted by Tobias-UK
Sadly a lack of moral compass is what is wrong with so much of the world these days
The problem with a moral compass is that it is highly subjective. Like when I missed my flight because I confused the date and BA made me buy a new ticket at full fare. Or the day I wanted to take a flight two hours earlier and BA wanted a £600 change fee. Or the time I was downgraded and given a “fare difference” of £24.

I accept that T&Cs are not perfect - but they are very much preferable to everyone applying their own individual moral compass.
nufnuf77 likes this.
LCY8737 is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2018, 8:46 am
  #23  
Moderator: British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Programs: Battleaxe Alliance
Posts: 22,127
Originally Posted by LCY8737
The problem with a moral compass is that it is highly subjective. Like when I missed my flight because I confused the date and BA made me buy a new ticket at full fare. Or the day I wanted to take a flight two hours earlier and BA wanted a £600 change fee. Or the time I was downgraded and given a “fare difference” of £24.
Apart from the last one, they are simply the fare rules and nothing to do with the moral compass or subjectivity, I suspect.

Now the last one is rather open to interpretation in terms of how they calculate the fare difference.
LTN Phobia is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2018, 8:50 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: LAX
Programs: AA Lifetime Gold but PlatPro thanks to LPs
Posts: 4,439
In AA-world, the T&Cs specifically prohibit purchase of a ticket for the sole purpose of accessing airport facilities.
QueenOfCoach is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2018, 10:50 am
  #25  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London
Programs: Mucci. Nothing else matters.
Posts: 38,644
Originally Posted by LCY8737
The problem with a moral compass is that it is highly subjective. Like when I missed my flight because I confused the date and BA made me buy a new ticket at full fare. Or the day I wanted to take a flight two hours earlier and BA wanted a £600 change fee.
I agree that it is subjective, but suggesting that BA should in either of the first two cases have had some moral obligation to allow you do to what you wanted to do seems to be pushing it.
Globaliser is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2018, 2:21 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6,349
Originally Posted by LTN Phobia
Apart from the last one, they are simply the fare rules and nothing to do with the moral compass or subjectivity, I suspect.

Now the last one is rather open to interpretation in terms of how they calculate the fare difference.
When it comes to rules....well there are rules around EC261 such as advising passengers. But BA choses to ignore them when it doesn't suit.

So I suppose both sides are gaming the system really.
mikeyfly likes this.
simons1 is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2018, 2:30 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 21 mls sw of ABZ
Programs: EK Siver, Dusit Gold, Cycling Proficiency Test, Tufty Club Member and Le Club Accorhotels Platinum
Posts: 312
So, if I am already airside at T5 and wish to pop out for say a smoke ( because of a delay etc), I can get the shuttle to C, stay on and then depart at the other end via departures?

Would my boarding pass work again on the way in?
ballogie is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2018, 2:35 pm
  #28  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Programs: Mucci de l'Arbitrage
Posts: 927
Originally Posted by ballogie
So, if I am already airside at T5 and wish to pop out for say a smoke ( because of a delay etc), I can get the shuttle to C, stay on and then depart at the other end via departures?

Would my boarding pass work again on the way in?
Nope you would have to offload yourself at customer services then pop out for a smoke and then pass through security again before the 35 min conformance cutoff.
Takiteasy is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2018, 2:42 pm
  #29  
Ambassador, British Airways; FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Leeds, UK
Programs: BA GGL/CCR, GfL, HH Diamond
Posts: 42,964
Originally Posted by ballogie
So, if I am already airside at T5 and wish to pop out for say a smoke ( because of a delay etc), I can get the shuttle to C, stay on and then depart at the other end via departures?

Would my boarding pass work again on the way in?
if you need to go for a smoke you are supposed to use the escorted service out and not self land.
KARFA is online now  
Old Jul 18, 2018, 2:46 pm
  #30  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Programs: Mucci de l'Arbitrage
Posts: 927
Originally Posted by KARFA
if you need to go for a smoke you are supposed to use the escorted service out and not self land.
If that’s once an hour on the hour, it’s not very convenient, so I suspect the self-service works better here.
Takiteasy is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.