£20 compensation for no IFE on a 13-hour flight - fair?
#31
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cambridge, UK
Programs: Mucci, BA GGL/CCR
Posts: 761
Thanks for the clarification. Virgin offer a rather limited network in comparison with BA so it's not really comparing like with like. It certainly wouldn't work for me.
#32
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: GLA
Programs: BAEC: Silver. Nothing else as TopCashBack trumps all hotel programs
Posts: 801
Doesnt work for me either as I fly from Glasgow. Not suggesting jump to Virgin. Just suggesting he put that point to BA in search of a more reasonable compensation than a few fivers for no IFE on a 13 hour flight.
#33
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cambridge, UK
Programs: Mucci, BA GGL/CCR
Posts: 761
I don't disagree with you at all; I would be unhappy if I were in the OP's shoes. As posted above however, I don't suspect BA will care if he suggests moving to VS as a result. IAG's share price is buoyant and it seems that's all that matters.
#34
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX (elite) and a few others (non-elite)
Posts: 687
Thank you all for your input and support. Sadly, although I do think it seems bloody mean, it also sounds as though twenty miserable quid is par for the course, so I think we will shrug our shoulders and accept what is on offer. Junior Offspring, being a minor, will be a lot more pleased with twenty quid than I would be!!
FWIW I will add that half the problem with getting a response out of them was their refusal to deal with Junior Offspring because she is a minor, coupled with a refusal to deal with me unless I had Junior Offspring's written consent, which seem extraordinary to me. Either a minor is competent to complain, or not - and if they're not, they're probably not competent to authorise someone else to do it for them. I am not quite sure which jobsworth came up with that particular obstacle to customer relations, but I would dearly love to meet them and shake them warmly by the throat.
Since Junior Offspring is in boarding school, getting the written consent took a while, and getting BA to acknowledge that I had sent it took weeks and multiple chasers. If the crew on board had simply apologised and coughed up the twenty quid voucher all of this could have been avoided, as could my ire and frustration at their attitude. I am getting increasingly fed up with the way that airlines try so hard to avoid compensating passengers for absolutely anything.
I would add that I am perfectly prepared to fight for my rights and have done so on many occasions (I recently had MH on the verge of winding-up proceedings, which appeared to concentrate their minds, and loosen their purse-strings, wonderfully) but where the compensation, though woeful, represents the standard measure then the brainache and stress of trying to get more (particularly when it has taken too much even to get this far) just isn't worth it, even to make a point.
Again, thanks to all for your time and input - what a great community this is!
FWIW I will add that half the problem with getting a response out of them was their refusal to deal with Junior Offspring because she is a minor, coupled with a refusal to deal with me unless I had Junior Offspring's written consent, which seem extraordinary to me. Either a minor is competent to complain, or not - and if they're not, they're probably not competent to authorise someone else to do it for them. I am not quite sure which jobsworth came up with that particular obstacle to customer relations, but I would dearly love to meet them and shake them warmly by the throat.
Since Junior Offspring is in boarding school, getting the written consent took a while, and getting BA to acknowledge that I had sent it took weeks and multiple chasers. If the crew on board had simply apologised and coughed up the twenty quid voucher all of this could have been avoided, as could my ire and frustration at their attitude. I am getting increasingly fed up with the way that airlines try so hard to avoid compensating passengers for absolutely anything.
I would add that I am perfectly prepared to fight for my rights and have done so on many occasions (I recently had MH on the verge of winding-up proceedings, which appeared to concentrate their minds, and loosen their purse-strings, wonderfully) but where the compensation, though woeful, represents the standard measure then the brainache and stress of trying to get more (particularly when it has taken too much even to get this far) just isn't worth it, even to make a point.
Again, thanks to all for your time and input - what a great community this is!
Last edited by IanFromHKG; May 28, 2018 at 5:09 am Reason: Correcting a typo
#35
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2002
Programs: Mucci des Hommes Magiques et Magnifiques
Posts: 19,092
my understanding is also it's
wt 3k avios / £20 e-voucher / or a duty free voucher
wtp 5k / £30 £20
cw 10k / £60 15k £75
f 20k / £120 £100
and it's best to go for avios rather than the alternatives since you could theoretically get 3 times the value out of it compared to the voucher.
This may seem a bit tough on longer, more expensive wt flights since they could be very boring if you had no other entertainment with you, but this has to be set against the lowest wt fare per leg of around £140. Hopefully the traveller concerned had their own gizmo with them.
What is supposed to happen is the csd or csm is supposed to action this on board, but we've had mixed information as to whether this is effective or not.
wt 3k avios / £20 e-voucher / or a duty free voucher
wtp 5k / £30 £20
cw 10k / £60 15k £75
f 20k / £120 £100
and it's best to go for avios rather than the alternatives since you could theoretically get 3 times the value out of it compared to the voucher.
This may seem a bit tough on longer, more expensive wt flights since they could be very boring if you had no other entertainment with you, but this has to be set against the lowest wt fare per leg of around £140. Hopefully the traveller concerned had their own gizmo with them.
What is supposed to happen is the csd or csm is supposed to action this on board, but we've had mixed information as to whether this is effective or not.
#36
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: GLA
Programs: BAEC: Silver. Nothing else as TopCashBack trumps all hotel programs
Posts: 801
That is ridiculous. Of course a company cares if it looses a customer to a competitor , no matter how profitable they are. 1 customer can quickly become 1 million customers.
They might not "bend over backwards, quick call a board meeting" care. But they will care and it would be worth their while upping a £20 offer to keep said customer.
They might not "bend over backwards, quick call a board meeting" care. But they will care and it would be worth their while upping a £20 offer to keep said customer.
#37
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 7,464
That is ridiculous. Of course a company cares if it looses a customer to a competitor , no matter how profitable they are. 1 customer can quickly become 1 million customers.
They might not "bend over backwards, quick call a board meeting" care. But they will care and it would be worth their while upping a £20 offer to keep said customer.
They might not "bend over backwards, quick call a board meeting" care. But they will care and it would be worth their while upping a £20 offer to keep said customer.
#38
Join Date: Sep 2013
Programs: BAEC Gold, EK Skywards (enhanced Blue !), Oman Air Sindbad Gold
Posts: 6,398
@ IanFromHKG
So sad that the whole episode - and specifically the really poor manner in which it was handled by BA - has ended up leaving with you with such a nasty taste in the mouth.
Thanks for coming back to us. Can understand your sense of frustrated resignation, and reluctance to spend more time pursuing a better outcome.
(btw ............ I’m stealing this quip from you : “I am not quite sure which jobsworth came up with that particular obstacle to customer relations, but I would dearly love to meet them and shake them warmly by the throat.“)
So sad that the whole episode - and specifically the really poor manner in which it was handled by BA - has ended up leaving with you with such a nasty taste in the mouth.
Thanks for coming back to us. Can understand your sense of frustrated resignation, and reluctance to spend more time pursuing a better outcome.
(btw ............ I’m stealing this quip from you : “I am not quite sure which jobsworth came up with that particular obstacle to customer relations, but I would dearly love to meet them and shake them warmly by the throat.“)
#39
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX (elite) and a few others (non-elite)
Posts: 687
My understanding is also it's
WT 3k Avios / £20 e-voucher / or a duty free voucher
WTP 5k / £30
CW 10k / £60
F 20k / £120
and it's best to go for Avios rather than the alternatives since you could theoretically get 3 times the value out of it compared to the voucher.
This may seem a bit tough on longer, more expensive WT flights since they could be very boring if you had no other entertainment with you, but this has to be set against the lowest WT fare per leg of around £140. Hopefully the traveller concerned had their own gizmo with them.
What is supposed to happen is the CSD or CSM is supposed to action this on board, but we've had mixed information as to whether this is effective or not.
WT 3k Avios / £20 e-voucher / or a duty free voucher
WTP 5k / £30
CW 10k / £60
F 20k / £120
and it's best to go for Avios rather than the alternatives since you could theoretically get 3 times the value out of it compared to the voucher.
This may seem a bit tough on longer, more expensive WT flights since they could be very boring if you had no other entertainment with you, but this has to be set against the lowest WT fare per leg of around £140. Hopefully the traveller concerned had their own gizmo with them.
What is supposed to happen is the CSD or CSM is supposed to action this on board, but we've had mixed information as to whether this is effective or not.
Hahaha!! I can't claim authorship, but you are very welcome
Again, thanks to all, you have definitely lightened my mood and temper about the whole sorry episode!
#40
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cambridge, UK
Programs: Mucci, BA GGL/CCR
Posts: 761
Glad you are feeling better about it all, I'd be peeved in your situation too. As I mentioned above, BA are unlikely to care if you move your business elsewhere but if VS works for you, I'd be tempted to give it a try.
#42
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,208
Whether it's a fair amount is subjective. I certainly wouldn't pay £20 for IFE if they charged extra for it....apart from the moving map I rarely look at it anyway. On one BJS-LHR flight on Air China the large screen wasn't working which was a blessing as I was spared a repeat of the party line content I had to endure on the way out.
#44
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brighton. UK
Programs: BA Gold / VS /IHG Diamond & Ambassador
Posts: 14,192
Yes but with conditions - like most status matches they want to see a pattern of flying with the existing carrier and bookings with the new carrier to assure themselves that you are (on the face of it) going to give them some business that makes it worth their while.
BTW the VS compensation / service gesture for no IFE is £20 cash in economy (and I think £30 if you accept duty free vouchers).
#45
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: GLA
Programs: BAEC: Silver. Nothing else as TopCashBack trumps all hotel programs
Posts: 801
Thats like saying the OP is upset about what they missed during the flight and is desperate to watch it later.
The IFE is there to take the misery out of a 13 hour flight in Y.
I would certainly pay more than £20 to have some entertainment for 13 hours.