Theoretical infant-in-arms
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 756
Theoretical infant-in-arms
Hypothetically, what would happen if you added a 'fake' infant-in-arms passenger, qualifying everyone in the party to free advance seat assignment at the time of booking, only to turn up at the airport without the infant?
Depending on the size of the party, and the 10% infant-in-arms fare, it might prove quite a saving (and possibly get you banned by the airline)!
Depending on the size of the party, and the 10% infant-in-arms fare, it might prove quite a saving (and possibly get you banned by the airline)!
#3
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 756
Ha! OK, here's the 'honest' version, then. I book a r/t for me and three relatives, with an infant-in-arms ticket (my son) attached to one of the passengers, and reserve all our seats for both legs in advance, gratis. At some point before the flight we decide that our son should actually stay at home with my wife, so it will be just the four adults flying.
We forget to notify BA of this fact in advance, and arrive at the airport and explain the situation to the check-in agent instead.
I presume we would not get charged for our advanced ticket assignments for the outbound leg at this late stage. The infant-in-arms ticket would, I also presume, be removed from the inbound booking at this point. But would that knock out the free advanced seat assignments for the four adults on the inbound?
We forget to notify BA of this fact in advance, and arrive at the airport and explain the situation to the check-in agent instead.
I presume we would not get charged for our advanced ticket assignments for the outbound leg at this late stage. The infant-in-arms ticket would, I also presume, be removed from the inbound booking at this point. But would that knock out the free advanced seat assignments for the four adults on the inbound?
#4
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
No, you won't be charged.
But, your free seat assignments will most likely be returned to the pool and you will be assigned seats from the leftovers. Depending on the aircraft and its load, these are likely to be, at that point the least desireable seats available.
All depends on your risk tolerance.
But, your free seat assignments will most likely be returned to the pool and you will be assigned seats from the leftovers. Depending on the aircraft and its load, these are likely to be, at that point the least desireable seats available.
All depends on your risk tolerance.
#5
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 756
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2007
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 12,046
Hypothetically, what would happen if you added a 'fake' infant-in-arms passenger, qualifying everyone in the party to free advance seat assignment at the time of booking, only to turn up at the airport without the infant?
Depending on the size of the party, and the 10% infant-in-arms fare, it might prove quite a saving (and possibly get you banned by the airline)!
Depending on the size of the party, and the 10% infant-in-arms fare, it might prove quite a saving (and possibly get you banned by the airline)!
Does the board think it is more dishonest, less dishonest or the same degree of dishonest as flying ex-EU and then ditching the last sector?
#7
Join Date: Dec 2016
Programs: BAEC GGL/CR; Hilton Diamond; Mucci des Puccis
Posts: 5,520
I don't know, call me Mr Grumpy, but for me this abusing a concession that exists to make life a bit easier for people with young infants, and the logical end point if it were to become widespread practice would be that the concession would be removed. That would be a shame.
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2008
Programs: AA EXP/LTP, BA GGL/CCR/GfL, HH D/LTD, SPG/MR Plat/LTP
Posts: 10,074
I don't know, call me Mr Grumpy, but for me this abusing a concession that exists to make life a bit easier for people with young infants, and the logical end point if it were to become widespread practice would be that the concession would be removed. That would be a shame.
#9
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
Hypothetically, what would happen if you added a 'fake' infant-in-arms passenger, qualifying everyone in the party to free advance seat assignment at the time of booking, only to turn up at the airport without the infant?
Depending on the size of the party, and the 10% infant-in-arms fare, it might prove quite a saving (and possibly get you banned by the airline)!
Depending on the size of the party, and the 10% infant-in-arms fare, it might prove quite a saving (and possibly get you banned by the airline)!
Ha! OK, here's the 'honest' version, then. I book a r/t for me and three relatives, with an infant-in-arms ticket (my son) attached to one of the passengers, and reserve all our seats for both legs in advance, gratis. At some point before the flight we decide that our son should actually stay at home with my wife, so it will be just the four adults flying.
We forget to notify BA of this fact in advance, and arrive at the airport and explain the situation to the check-in agent instead.
I presume we would not get charged for our advanced ticket assignments for the outbound leg at this late stage. The infant-in-arms ticket would, I also presume, be removed from the inbound booking at this point. But would that knock out the free advanced seat assignments for the four adults on the inbound?
We forget to notify BA of this fact in advance, and arrive at the airport and explain the situation to the check-in agent instead.
I presume we would not get charged for our advanced ticket assignments for the outbound leg at this late stage. The infant-in-arms ticket would, I also presume, be removed from the inbound booking at this point. But would that knock out the free advanced seat assignments for the four adults on the inbound?
#10
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 740
If you actually intend to fly with an infant and then cancel at the last minute then there is nothing wrong with this. It happened to friends of mine who were due to come to my wedding. Infant had been ill and they were waiting for test results, which didn't come in time so mother stayed at home with infant. Thankfully the test results were negative so they could have come after all but it wasn't worth the risk.
Of course there is no way of the airline telling if you have set the whole thing up, assuming you have filled in advance passenger info, unless they demand a medical note. I doubt they would though.
Whether it's honest or not is another matter.
Of course there is no way of the airline telling if you have set the whole thing up, assuming you have filled in advance passenger info, unless they demand a medical note. I doubt they would though.
Whether it's honest or not is another matter.
#11
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
I doubt that this level of larceny happens routinely do it will be hard to achieve a good statistical analysis.
Alternatively, you could rob an old woman for her cash and use that to pay for the seat assignments.
#13
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 101
The big issue I see with this is as mentioned if it becomes common place occurance. BA would probably end the practice of everyone in the party having free allocation and become the same as Virgin (and I assume others) that only give 1 adult and infant the free seat.
A few rotten apples spoil it for everyone as they say.
A few rotten apples spoil it for everyone as they say.
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,354
Hypothetically, you would have deprived a single mum with her infant (or a couple with an infant) of the seats that should have been theirs. Everyone is responsible for their own compass, but very personally, I would feel horrid and frankly pathetic if I saw such an unfair outcome because I had not returned that infant seat to its rightful allocation as soon as I would know that I would not need it for legitimate reasons. Flights when not enough bassinets are available in view of the number of infants in the cabin are far from infrequent.
#15
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 756
And maybe let's remember that this is hypothetical. I've never done this, and I'm not encouraging anyone to do so.