Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Nut Allergy Warning and then Serving

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 3, 2018, 2:32 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: SW London
Programs: BAEC Silver; Hilton Diamond;a miscellany of other hotel non-statuses
Posts: 3,607
I've had this announcement on a couple of flights recently. After one the duck with (loose) walnuts in the salad dressing was served. I partially recall that not all nuts are nuts for allergy purposes, so maybe this is OK ?
EsherFlyer is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2018, 3:09 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Somewhere between SFO and LAX...FYI aka FAT
Programs: BAEC - back to lowly blue. Marriott - Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 466
Originally Posted by crazy8534
Have a look at this professor.

It's just wonderful when people with no idea and no training pass comments on things they know nothing about but it appears that this is the kind of post-expert, post-knowledge world we live in...
I'm curious: I didn't see where they indicated whether the reaction was from accidentally/unknowingly ingesting something they were allergic to or from airborne allergens. That be an important detail in light of this discussion, I would think.
JayeJ is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2018, 3:23 pm
  #18  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 325
This has happened on a flight I've been on... the crew then were very specific in saying that their SOP is not to serve loose nuts but that the advice from their internal doctors was that it was safe to continue serving dishes with nuts in them as the 'contaminants' were considered less likely to be cause an airborne issue if they weren't loose au naturel.

Also worth noting that while they can ask other passengers not to eat nuts, they have no way to guarantee that no one will eat anyway something they had brought with them, however close they may be sitting to the relevant passenger.

I'm also very pleased to note that this thread has yet to descend to a Carry On level!
LordBuckethead is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2018, 3:24 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NB, Canada
Programs: Fairmont, Amex MR, Marriott
Posts: 2,531
Originally Posted by crazy8534
Have a look at this professor.

It's just wonderful when people with no idea and no training pass comments on things they know nothing about but it appears that this is the kind of post-expert, post-knowledge world we live in...
Originally Posted by JayeJ
I'm curious: I didn't see where they indicated whether the reaction was from accidentally/unknowingly ingesting something they were allergic to or from airborne allergens. That be an important detail in light of this discussion, I would think.
This is a pretty thin report on the issue. It even starts with "Minimal data exist on the prevalence and characteristics of in-flight reactions to foods."

Food allergy issues are extremely complex, with so many factors it can be hard to get good data on how prevalent the issue really is. And self reporting adds even more questions.

Even people with allergies will sometimes not inform people who are serving them about their allergies, which seems crazy to me, but is probably as common as people who say they are allergic to something when they actually are not.

I do not think skipping peanut or nut items on a flight is a big deal, but determining how effective it is could be tough to quantify.
drwilliams is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2018, 3:32 pm
  #20  
Moderator: British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Programs: Battleaxe Alliance
Posts: 22,127
Are you sure it was actually peanut and not another nut?
I cannot remember seeing peanut on any of what must well exceed 1,000 sectors in CE.
LTN Phobia is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2018, 5:41 pm
  #21  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,209
Is the humble peanut the only food item that deserves such an allergy warning to be made or are there others?
HIDDY is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2018, 5:50 pm
  #22  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 948
Originally Posted by walkingtall
If the rules are different cabin , then the cabin crew was correct , as the passenger was in Y

it wasn't loose nuts , just a desert topped with nuts , to be honest i did not eat the meal , but certainly looked like nuts when it was served and the CC did confirm it was peanut
Peanuts are however not nuts.

BA followed their procedures, and if you are at risk of death from peanuts it is probably a bad idea to suggest onboard that you are allergic, what would BA do? Not serve food because of it? I find that unlikely they would, and if peanuts were served in the cabin without any other options and someone brought it to BAs attention after everyone was loaded I would expect them to find themselves in the terminal awaiting a rebooking rather than no food being served.
theddo is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2018, 6:35 pm
  #23  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Jakarta
Programs: BA GGL, GA PLAT, SQ Gold
Posts: 527
Originally Posted by LTN Phobia
Are you sure it was actually peanut and not another nut?
I cannot remember seeing peanut on any of what must well exceed 1,000 sectors in CE.
Couldn't guarantee it was Peanut , but when i asked why was being served , i wasn't told its almond or similar , i was told that the passenger was in a different cabin , so hence my query
walkingtall is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2018, 2:27 am
  #24  
Moderator: Qatar Airways
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: LHR/NCE/MIA
Programs: BAEC GfL & GGL, SQ Gold, Amex Centurion, Mucci des Chevaliers des Bons Mots et Qui Savent Moucher
Posts: 8,948
So I'm in CE in Row 5, and ET starts at Row 6.

According to the BA rules, I can enjoy my "loose nuts" quite willingly, all because I'm sat in a different cabin to an allergy sufferer in Row 6.

I had no idea that the CE/ET curtain had such power! Evidently it can prevent allergic reactions.

Sure, it's an extreme example, and I'd like to hope that common sense would prevail, but the BA rules seem to say I'd be within my own rights to demand that I can enjoy my snack.

M
msm2000uk is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2018, 3:05 am
  #25  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,060
From The Anaphylaxis Campaign:
Some people with peanut allergy report that they experience symptoms when peanut snacks are handed around to passengers with their drinks. The most likely cause of these reactions is skin contact. If you touch a fold-down tray, or some other surface, that has previously been touched by a passenger eating peanuts you could have a reaction. To minimise the risk, you could carry ‘wet wipes’ to clean surfaces as soon as you get on the plane.

Reactions caused by inhalation of peanut dust are thought to be less likely, but may sometimes occur, particularly if you are extremely allergic and the passengers sitting near you are eating peanuts.

You should be guided by your doctor or consultant, and your allergy history. If you know you are at the high end of the risk scale (for example, you have reacted by inhaling peanut allergen in the past) then it would be sensible to seek a flight that doesn’t sell or serve peanuts by contacting the airline well in advance.

The response of the airlines

Some airlines have removed peanut snacks altogether from certain classes of flight. Others will withdraw them from specified flights if they are contacted well in advance. Others will not withdraw them under any circumstances. If possible, contact the airline you plan to fly with well in advance and find out their policy. If you succeed in booking a ‘peanut friendly’ flight, seek confirmation when you check in.

British Airways and Virgin Atlantic are among those airlines that have removed peanut snacks from certain classes of flight but check that this is still their policy.

Other foods

Although airlines tend to focus on the possible risk from peanuts, other foods must not be neglected. The steam from certain cooked foods (e.g. fish and shellfish) has been known to trigger reactions. If you are allergic to fish or shellfish, you may be concerned that meals served to other passengers may cause you problems.

(my bolding)
muscat is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2018, 3:57 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Programs: BA Exec
Posts: 647
Originally Posted by msm2000uk
So I'm in CE in Row 5, and ET starts at Row 6.

According to the BA rules, I can enjoy my "loose nuts" quite willingly, all because I'm sat in a different cabin to an allergy sufferer in Row 6.

I had no idea that the CE/ET curtain had such power! Evidently it can prevent allergic reactions.

Sure, it's an extreme example, and I'd like to hope that common sense would prevail, but the BA rules seem to say I'd be within my own rights to demand that I can enjoy my snack.

M
Ops. Manual states on shorthaul aircraft procedure is to suspend serving (or selling!) of nut based snacks across the whole aircraft. On longhaul aircraft, where cabins are segregated by hard bulkhead fixtures (toilets, galleys etc.) then the suspension applies to that cabin only.

Severely allergic passengers can preboard and wipe down the seat area and tray table with wipes if they wish (again from Crew Ops Manual "OM B").

Common sense on part of crew is to have a discussion with the affected person (or their parents/guardians) as to the specifics of their requirements and how they can go about minimising any risk.

msm2000uk likes this.
Bar Operator is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2018, 4:35 am
  #27  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: The North
Posts: 1,844
I am fortunate not to suffer from any allergies (at least, that I’m aware of!) but for those who have a serious nut allergy it can cause life threatening anaphylactic shock.

As others have discussed, the risk from airborne particles is less than via contact, but it’s a case of doing what you can to minimise that risk.

Those with serious allergies often carry “epipens” with which ti inject themselves in case of an allergic reaction. However, this is quite unpleasant(!) and prevention is better than cure.

There is also a problem of ‘compliance’: many teenagers, in particular, don’t carry their epipens with them all the time - it is seen as a “disease talisman”, something which marks them out as different at an age when they simple want to fit in. In turn this makes needless, preventable deaths more likely. Former colleagues of mine have looked at ways to improve this, through different forms of education of the teenagers themselves.
Originally Posted by Bar Operator
Common sense on part of crew is to have a discussion with the affected person (or their parents/guardians) as to the specifics of their requirements and how they can go about minimising any risk.
As with many impairments, this is actually best practice (and, I’d like to think, common courtesy): discuss someone’s needs in a way that respects their dignity, and take it from there.
squawk is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2018, 4:50 am
  #28  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Offshore Island
Programs: BAEC Silver
Posts: 308
Originally Posted by walkingtall
Flew Manchester to Heathrow on Tuesday 3rd in CE, on boarding a passenger told the crew about a peanut allergy and made an announcement about not selling and asking passengers to refrain from eating peanuts.

Meal was served and the desert has peanuts on the top , I asked if this was sensible as they had given a peanut warning , i was told it wasn't a problem due to the passenger being down the back of the plane.

I am no expert in either allergies to peanuts , but would it be worth the risk in serving desert ?
I has a similar situation on my flight from Salzburg to LHR the other day. Perhaps it's a ploy by BA to save money.
TheOldMan is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2018, 5:20 am
  #29  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 74
Thanks to BA's overuse of cheese in almost every meal option in every class, I bring sandwiches on long haul flights

I make my own bread

It absolutely 100% WILL contain nuts (I even use groundnut oil instead of olive oil as it bakes better) and might even be ... shock, horror ... a peanut butter sandwich

I am not going hungry on an 11-12 hour flight, so why doesn't the affected person, the minority, remove themselves from the 'contamination' and take responsibility for their own issue?

I am severely allergic to cheese (fatally allergic in fact, as if I accidentally eat it, it triggers such an attack that I need a steroid injection to be able to breathe), so much so that the smell of e.g. lasagne is going to make me vomit. Copiously.. It may even induce anaphylaxia. I don't know, because I remove myself from the problem, and go and stand elsewhere while the cheese meal is being served to people near me, then resume my seat once it's over

I would never consider that anyone else should be inconvenienced for my allergy
chrisboote is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2018, 5:25 am
  #30  
Moderator: Qatar Airways
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: LHR/NCE/MIA
Programs: BAEC GfL & GGL, SQ Gold, Amex Centurion, Mucci des Chevaliers des Bons Mots et Qui Savent Moucher
Posts: 8,948
Originally Posted by chrisboote
Thanks to BA's overuse of cheese in almost every meal option in every class, I bring sandwiches on long haul flights

I make my own bread

It absolutely 100% WILL contain nuts (I even use groundnut oil instead of olive oil as it bakes better) and might even be ... shock, horror ... a peanut butter sandwich

I am not going hungry on an 11-12 hour flight, so why doesn't the affected person, the minority, remove themselves from the 'contamination' and take responsibility for their own issue?

I am severely allergic to cheese (fatally allergic in fact, as if I accidentally eat it, it triggers such an attack that I need a steroid injection to be able to breathe), so much so that the smell of e.g. lasagne is going to make me vomit. Copiously.. It may even induce anaphylaxia. I don't know, because I remove myself from the problem, and go and stand elsewhere while the cheese meal is being served to people near me, then resume my seat once it's over

I would never consider that anyone else should be inconvenienced for my allergy
So then based on your description, do you feel unwell on every BA flight that you take?

M
msm2000uk is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.