HighLife shop to close on Euro services

Old Nov 30, 2017, 4:03 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,547
HighLife shop to close on Euro services

I was speaking to a BA eurofleet crew member yesterday and was advised that Highlife Shop will be closing for good on all Euro services in January 2018. Apparently the soon to arrive A321 NEO's will have very restricted galley space and to bring all Euro services in line, on board purchases will be reduced to those of a M&S nature only.

I guess my RFS ciggie runs to Switzerland were good while they lasted ☺
1Aturnleft is offline  
Old Nov 30, 2017, 4:17 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Programs: Mucci de l'Arbitrage
Posts: 927
Makes sense from a space rationalisation, customer bother and probably financially as well (rarely see anyone purchasing anything).
Arent your ciggie trips cheaper to buy at the GVA or ZRH duty free shops anyway (including arrivals which have great selections)?
Takiteasy is offline  
Old Nov 30, 2017, 4:42 pm
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,547
Originally Posted by Takiteasy
Arent your ciggie trips cheaper to buy at the GVA or ZRH duty free shops anyway (including arrivals which have great selections)?
There not a great deal in it cost wise - still worth a day out to ZRH/GVA/BSL compared to duty paid prices in the UK. The additional sweetener for me with Highlife shop is zero exchange rates/fees when purchasing on board in as opposed to at the airport in CHF plus the additional Avios earned with Highlife shop. My better half also usually finds something to purchase on most flights... usually some sort of cosmetic.
1Aturnleft is offline  
Old Dec 1, 2017, 1:54 pm
  #4  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 325
Originally Posted by 1Aturnleft
Apparently the soon to arrive A321 NEO's will have very restricted galley space and to bring all Euro services in line, on board purchases will be reduced to those of a M&S nature only.
I am led to believe that the fall-out from this could be even more severe, as the space available is smaller than anyone had previously realised. There is quite a serious debate raging over whether it is better to cap CE at a certain small-ish row limit (and take a hit on CE revenue/Avios availability) or load even less BOB stock (and annoy ET pax some more). The fact that it could easily be resolved by a return to outstation catering doesn't seem to have occurred to anyone.
LordBuckethead is offline  
Old Dec 1, 2017, 2:21 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 7,168
Originally Posted by LordBuckethead
I am led to believe that the fall-out from this could be even more severe, as the space available is smaller than anyone had previously realised. There is quite a serious debate raging over whether it is better to cap CE at a certain small-ish row limit (and take a hit on CE revenue/Avios availability) or load even less BOB stock (and annoy ET pax some more). The fact that it could easily be resolved by a return to outstation catering doesn't seem to have occurred to anyone.
Or... larger galleys, considering that 180Y and a full load of bags will bring the plane close to MTOW in certain cases, with forced reductions in seat occupancy.

As always trying to do too many things at the same time and consistently failing.
13901 is offline  
Old Dec 1, 2017, 2:46 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,354
Amen! Maybe slightly less ridiculous toilet issues in Y as BoB+shopping sometimes blocked the aisle for the entire flight!
orbitmic is offline  
Old Dec 1, 2017, 4:23 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 67
Originally Posted by orbitmic
Amen! Maybe slightly less ridiculous toilet issues in Y as BoB+shopping sometimes blocked the aisle for the entire flight!
Should not be issue on NEOs as no trolley tops will be used meaning you should be able to get past trolleys like on easyJet!
777VIIO is offline  
Old Dec 2, 2017, 12:46 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: London
Programs: BAEC, AA, Emirates, Hilton, Hyatt, Taj Hotels
Posts: 2,339
Talking

Originally Posted by LordBuckethead
There is quite a serious debate raging over whether it is better to cap CE at a certain small-ish row limit.
Here's a thought - if this happens they could perhaps install proper 2x2 seating. Like AA domestic F.

Won't the removal of Duty Free reduce the earnings of crew who, as I understand it, were paid commission on sales?
Betteronacamel is offline  
Old Dec 2, 2017, 1:01 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Programs: Executive Club: Gold - Flying Blue: Gold
Posts: 1,368
It all shambles. I work for a big IT/Network company. The thing you do in a transformation is to study the customer journey from explore and buying until checking out. You want to make sure that you don't forget any aspect of operation and customer experience as you do your transformation. One area of transformation might impact others you might have not thought about. BA has done the worst in that it focused on cost cutting everywhere without assessing the impacts. That's why they are not able to provide BoB at LCY, a decent meal in Y on flights to DME and Duty Free sales in Europe. Cramming more seats, reducing galley space, insistig on everything needed to be paid in ET has lead to operational difficulties and falling customer ratings.
choosethedrew and volar like this.
BA6948 is offline  
Old Dec 2, 2017, 1:02 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: UK (currently)
Programs: BA Gold (and many other greater and lesser distinctions)
Posts: 7,192
Odd thing to do just as we are leaving the EU and (presumably) duty free shopping will return for UK - EU flights.
Frequentflyer99 is offline  
Old Dec 2, 2017, 2:05 am
  #11  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 325
Originally Posted by 13900
Or... larger galleys, considering that 180Y and a full load of bags will bring the plane close to MTOW in certain cases, with forced reductions in seat occupancy.
Is this really an issue? Wizz manages just fine - and with a significantly longer average sector length - and BA's AMM/BEY ex-BMED flights have a higher weight from the fittings and cargo and don't suffer. Well, it could become an issue if BA try to cut back on costs by declaring a lower MTOW again (as they did on some of the A319s...), but that's solved through paperwork!
Originally Posted by Betteronacamel
Here's a thought - if this happens they could perhaps install proper 2x2 seating. Like AA domestic F.
Won't the removal of Duty Free reduce the earnings of crew who, as I understand it, were paid commission on sales?
It'll be capped 'up to', not 'at'... they will want to keep the flexibility to have more Y when required.
And yes, it probably will.
Originally Posted by Frequentflyer99
Odd thing to do just as we are leaving the EU and (presumably) duty free shopping will return for UK - EU flights.
Companies are still hoping for a 'best case' Brexit (despite our government's apparent best efforts to move away from one!), which will mean staying in a Customs union.
LordBuckethead is offline  
Old Dec 2, 2017, 3:19 am
  #12  
formerly southsidesilver
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego,CA
Programs: BA Gold, UA Silver, HH Diamond
Posts: 996
It won't be missed by me. Mainly just junk I don't need being sold, so will be nice to not have it on short routes where most people don't buy anything.
When I Travel The World is offline  
Old Dec 2, 2017, 3:21 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold, Accor Gold
Posts: 1,408
Good news, always felt rather sorry for the crew dragging a cart of overpriced junk down the cabin to be ignored by 95%+ of pax.
bhbloke is offline  
Old Dec 2, 2017, 11:27 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 7,168
Originally Posted by LordBuckethead
Is this really an issue? Wizz manages just fine - and with a significantly longer average sector length - and BA's AMM/BEY ex-BMED flights have a higher weight from the fittings and cargo and don't suffer. Well, it could become an issue if BA try to cut back on costs by declaring a lower MTOW again (as they did on some of the A319s...), but that's solved through paperwork!
It allegedly came from Airbus... I'm not involved in the project if not incidentally and marginally, but on certain sectors it seems that it might possibly create some sort of issue.

As for the MED... They do suffer, especially with excess bags on those lovely AMM and BEY and that extra fuel tank.
13901 is offline  
Old Dec 2, 2017, 1:57 pm
  #15  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 325
Originally Posted by 13900
It allegedly came from Airbus... I'm not involved in the project if not incidentally and marginally, but on certain sectors it seems that it might possibly create some sort of issue.

As for the MED... They do suffer, especially with excess bags on those lovely AMM and BEY and that extra fuel tank.
Thanks for the clarification ^
LordBuckethead is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.