BA WT+ or AA Premium Economy?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Las Vegas
Programs: BA Gold; Hilton Honors Diamond
Posts: 3,226
BA WT+ or AA Premium Economy?
Now that AA has well and truly launched its PE cabin / service I was curious whether anyone on here has experienced it and what your views were?
I have read a number of reviews online but nothing really beats a good FT critique.
Reason for asking is that I am looking to book a trip early next year to the UK and can either fly BA WT+ or AA PE, the former LAS - LHR on the 747 or the latter PHL - MAN on an A330.
Prices are equal whether flying AA or BA and irrespective of whether it's ticketed with AA or BA. It's between $1260 and $1300 per person which is - in my opinion - a pretty good deal for a TATL flight originating in the US.
I have read a number of reviews online but nothing really beats a good FT critique.
Reason for asking is that I am looking to book a trip early next year to the UK and can either fly BA WT+ or AA PE, the former LAS - LHR on the 747 or the latter PHL - MAN on an A330.
Prices are equal whether flying AA or BA and irrespective of whether it's ticketed with AA or BA. It's between $1260 and $1300 per person which is - in my opinion - a pretty good deal for a TATL flight originating in the US.
Last edited by Geordie405; Aug 25, 2017 at 9:40 am Reason: Spelling
#4
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: LHR, LGW
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 3,410
#5
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: London
Programs: BAEC Bronze
Posts: 573
oh I fly WT+ for all my flights unless it's Avios redemption and I treat myself to CW. But im speaking from experience. I wouldn't fly WT+ in one of the old 747s again. The hard product isn't that much better than WT on those birds in my opinion.
#6
Join Date: Nov 2016
Programs: BA Gold; IHG Plat
Posts: 116
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but every time I've booked Y with AA, they've given me Y+ by virtue of OWE. I think this is standard for BA Gold and Silver, so fare wise it would almost certainly beat paying for WT+.
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2010
Programs: AA
Posts: 14,724
You are thinking of MCE which is still Y but with more room. PE USA new product for AA and is a different class from economy (Y).
#8
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,797
To the OP's question if both are direct flights I would go towards AA with a brand new product/newer aircraft. BA seem to put their most nackered 747s on the LAS route with a very old WT+ seat.
#9
Join Date: Nov 2016
Programs: BA Gold; IHG Plat
Posts: 116
Ah, that makes sense. Most of my travel this year has been east, rather than west, although I have to book to fly to MSY soon so may try it out myself. ^
#10
Join Date: Jan 2005
Programs: BA Gold, AA Lifetime Gold 1.8mm, IC Spire Ambassador, Hilton Diamond, SPG Gold et al
Posts: 4,350
Given that, at the moment I don't believe the OP can be totally confident it will be available when the travel day comes. At least with BA WT+ it's more or less guaranteed.
#11
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Gloucestershire
Programs: BA Gold (ex-GGL, maybe future Silver), Hilton Diamond
Posts: 6,197
Are these two routes the only options? PHL and LAS aren't exactly near neighbours.
If the ultimate route is LAS-XXX-MAN I'd still choose the knackered 747, though might prefer LAS-LAX-LHR-MAN (yes, two stops!) because of the better BA product and maybe the option for AA as well.
Simply, a long economy feed into the PHL-MAN involves a lunchtime cross-country flight, followed by a relatively early departure (9 p.m. Eastern, 6 p.m. LAS) time, landing in the early morning and being at least 12 hours from a bed.
LAS-LHR-MAN allows you to try to get some sleep as soon as the plane takes off, you get your four or five hours, then get to MAN, pootle around for a few hours in the early evening with dinner and checking in to your hotel, and hopefully get to sleep at a relatively sensible time. Different people deal with jetlag early, but for me, west to east is always a nightmare but late departure and late landing work best.
If the ultimate route is LAS-XXX-MAN I'd still choose the knackered 747, though might prefer LAS-LAX-LHR-MAN (yes, two stops!) because of the better BA product and maybe the option for AA as well.
Simply, a long economy feed into the PHL-MAN involves a lunchtime cross-country flight, followed by a relatively early departure (9 p.m. Eastern, 6 p.m. LAS) time, landing in the early morning and being at least 12 hours from a bed.
LAS-LHR-MAN allows you to try to get some sleep as soon as the plane takes off, you get your four or five hours, then get to MAN, pootle around for a few hours in the early evening with dinner and checking in to your hotel, and hopefully get to sleep at a relatively sensible time. Different people deal with jetlag early, but for me, west to east is always a nightmare but late departure and late landing work best.
#13
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Las Vegas
Programs: BA Gold; Hilton Honors Diamond
Posts: 3,226
Are these two routes the only options? PHL and LAS aren't exactly near neighbours.
If the ultimate route is LAS-XXX-MAN I'd still choose the knackered 747, though might prefer LAS-LAX-LHR-MAN (yes, two stops!) because of the better BA product and maybe the option for AA as well.
Simply, a long economy feed into the PHL-MAN involves a lunchtime cross-country flight, followed by a relatively early departure (9 p.m. Eastern, 6 p.m. LAS) time, landing in the early morning and being at least 12 hours from a bed.
LAS-LHR-MAN allows you to try to get some sleep as soon as the plane takes off, you get your four or five hours, then get to MAN, pootle around for a few hours in the early evening with dinner and checking in to your hotel, and hopefully get to sleep at a relatively sensible time. Different people deal with jetlag early, but for me, west to east is always a nightmare but late departure and late landing work best.
If the ultimate route is LAS-XXX-MAN I'd still choose the knackered 747, though might prefer LAS-LAX-LHR-MAN (yes, two stops!) because of the better BA product and maybe the option for AA as well.
Simply, a long economy feed into the PHL-MAN involves a lunchtime cross-country flight, followed by a relatively early departure (9 p.m. Eastern, 6 p.m. LAS) time, landing in the early morning and being at least 12 hours from a bed.
LAS-LHR-MAN allows you to try to get some sleep as soon as the plane takes off, you get your four or five hours, then get to MAN, pootle around for a few hours in the early evening with dinner and checking in to your hotel, and hopefully get to sleep at a relatively sensible time. Different people deal with jetlag early, but for me, west to east is always a nightmare but late departure and late landing work best.
#14
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Dublin/UK/SPAIN
Programs: BA Gold. EI GoldCircle
Posts: 784
I've done LAS-PHL-MAN in J and it was some of the worse jet lag I ever had. Never again I'll be doing LAS or via LAX to LHR.
Or there is the VS option direct to manchester.
Or there is the VS option direct to manchester.
Last edited by HarryBA; Aug 25, 2017 at 12:33 pm
#15
Moderator: British Airways Executive Club, Marriott Bonvoy
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Englandshire
Programs: SPG LT Plat, BA G, BD*LG, MG Blue+ ...
Posts: 16,015
Since BA WT+ vs AA PE is likely to be a topic of potential interest for many forum readers, could I ask that further replies on this thread actually focus on addressing the topic ?
Thanks.
Thanks.