Galleries North - Etiquette/Foul language
#62
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 8,770
I had a slightly tamer version of this yesterday at FRA where I - a very casually dressed young guy in shorts - told a very smartly dressed older man that he should use headphones to watch the sport news on his iPad, not broadcast it out loud to the rest of us. He was clearly rather surprised at my impertinence, but he quickly corrected his behaviour.
#63
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bristol
Programs: BA GGL, UA Plat, DL Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 2,380
Almost exactly 2 years ago today, my cousin (a mild-mannered 5'10 40-something solicitor with a lovely wife, 3 children and a successful law practice) intervened when a young woman was being harassed by a drunken yob on a train from Blackpool to Preston.
The details are too tedious to relate but it ended with him punching the yob to the floor. Police attended and arrested all involved. My cousin was subsequently charged with ABH. During initial enquiries, the police quickly established (from witness statements and partial mobile footage) that my cousin had a solid defence in law. However the CPS nonetheless took it to trial.
From the day of being charged, to the end of the trial, a period of some 10 & a half months, his firm put him on gardening leave. He was paid his basic salary but not allowed to work on any cases, thus missing out on almost a year's experience, overtime and bonuses. It was a horrible period for him and his family.
In the event he was cleared of any wrongdoing and walked free without a stain on his character. But it left his faith in the system severely shaken and almost cost him his marrriage.
So, if you have anything to lose - PULL THAT PUNCH !!! Let the staff sort it out. Punching an idiot's lights out may seem primally satisfying, but as a respectable person it's likely to hurt you a lot more than it hurts them
#64
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 383
Well done PallionPete and the CS agents.
Unfortunately it's not just skater types. In GF I asked a businessman if he could lower the volume and quantum of F words in his mobile phone conversation as I was there with my wife and daughter. He told me to mind my own f...ing business and stop listening to his call. Unfortunately when I complained to CS at the lounge entrance all they said was they would monitor his behaviour
He carried on, no sign of CS, so we moved and he won.
Unfortunately it's not just skater types. In GF I asked a businessman if he could lower the volume and quantum of F words in his mobile phone conversation as I was there with my wife and daughter. He told me to mind my own f...ing business and stop listening to his call. Unfortunately when I complained to CS at the lounge entrance all they said was they would monitor his behaviour
He carried on, no sign of CS, so we moved and he won.
#65
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2014
Programs: Regarded as total and utter snob amongst the BAEC community.
Posts: 971
A cool idea for DYKWIA moments like these.
I can’t remember who it was, but I am sure it was someone on this forum. Told us about a loud mouth on a train trip. So he took note of everything this person was saying, found out the company he worked for, the guy’s name, told his friend to dump the shares in the company as the sales target was not being hit and finally called the CEO of the company concerned and told him what happened.
Alternatively, start a live feed through a social media platform and send it out to the world or simply take a photo of the person and tag it as a W*****, T*** etc.
I can’t remember who it was, but I am sure it was someone on this forum. Told us about a loud mouth on a train trip. So he took note of everything this person was saying, found out the company he worked for, the guy’s name, told his friend to dump the shares in the company as the sales target was not being hit and finally called the CEO of the company concerned and told him what happened.
Alternatively, start a live feed through a social media platform and send it out to the world or simply take a photo of the person and tag it as a W*****, T*** etc.
#66
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canada
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 1,254
Sorry, I'm sticking to my guns. Assuming that 'ladies' i.e. women cannot handle or should not have to hear foul language, whereas it's ok around men is sexist and assuming women are delicate flowers who simply cannot handle it. Around children, yes absolutely.
This does not detract from my opinion that using that kind of language loudly in a lounge is inappropriate because using that language in any public/formal setting is inappropriate. This has nothing to do with whether the audience is male/female and has nothing to do with chivalry either.
This does not detract from my opinion that using that kind of language loudly in a lounge is inappropriate because using that language in any public/formal setting is inappropriate. This has nothing to do with whether the audience is male/female and has nothing to do with chivalry either.
#67
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Mexico City
Programs: Life Miles, Miles and more
Posts: 518
Definitely the right action by the OP.
On the sexism issue, well pretty much all my female friends would have some very choice words for anyone who suggested they need protecting from a few swear words! Particularly my Latin friends
On the sexism issue, well pretty much all my female friends would have some very choice words for anyone who suggested they need protecting from a few swear words! Particularly my Latin friends
#68
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Mexico City
Programs: Life Miles, Miles and more
Posts: 518
Sorry, I'm sticking to my guns. Assuming that 'ladies' i.e. women cannot handle or should not have to hear foul language, whereas it's ok around men is sexist and assuming women are delicate flowers who simply cannot handle it. Around children, yes absolutely.
This does not detract from my opinion that using that kind of language loudly in a lounge is inappropriate because using that language in any public/formal setting is inappropriate. This has nothing to do with whether the audience is male/female and has nothing to do with chivalry either.
This does not detract from my opinion that using that kind of language loudly in a lounge is inappropriate because using that language in any public/formal setting is inappropriate. This has nothing to do with whether the audience is male/female and has nothing to do with chivalry either.
#69
Join Date: Jul 2015
Programs: UA Platinum, Starbucks Gold
Posts: 873
Sorry, I'm sticking to my guns. Assuming that 'ladies' i.e. women cannot handle or should not have to hear foul language, whereas it's ok around men is sexist and assuming women are delicate flowers who simply cannot handle it. Around children, yes absolutely.
This does not detract from my opinion that using that kind of language loudly in a lounge is inappropriate because using that language in any public/formal setting is inappropriate. This has nothing to do with whether the audience is male/female and has nothing to do with chivalry either.
This does not detract from my opinion that using that kind of language loudly in a lounge is inappropriate because using that language in any public/formal setting is inappropriate. This has nothing to do with whether the audience is male/female and has nothing to do with chivalry either.
#70
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ipswich
Posts: 7,543
When people start bemoaning the loss of chivalry it seems predicated on the notion that somehow good manners are no longer appreciated. I see it differently. We should expand good manners to include everyone regardless of gender. Why not hold the door open for your companion, male or female?
As with someone upthread, I was raised to be considerate and courteous to all people.
Treating people differently purely because of their gender IS sexist, however people rationalise it. That's pretty much the dictionary definition.
I know many men who would feel uncomfortable and even intimidated by the behaviour described. Why should they not be afforded the same consideration as the females of the species?
As with someone upthread, I was raised to be considerate and courteous to all people.
Treating people differently purely because of their gender IS sexist, however people rationalise it. That's pretty much the dictionary definition.
I know many men who would feel uncomfortable and even intimidated by the behaviour described. Why should they not be afforded the same consideration as the females of the species?
#71
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canada
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 1,254
When people start bemoaning the loss of chivalry it seems predicated on the notion that somehow good manners are no longer appreciated. I see it differently. We should expand good manners to include everyone regardless of gender. Why not hold the door open for your companion, male or female?
As with someone upthread, I was raised to be considerate and courteous to all people.
Treating people differently purely because of their gender IS sexist, however people rationalise it. That's pretty much the dictionary definition.
I know many men who would feel uncomfortable and even intimidated by the behaviour described. Why should they not be afforded the same consideration as the females of the species?
As with someone upthread, I was raised to be considerate and courteous to all people.
Treating people differently purely because of their gender IS sexist, however people rationalise it. That's pretty much the dictionary definition.
I know many men who would feel uncomfortable and even intimidated by the behaviour described. Why should they not be afforded the same consideration as the females of the species?
#72
Community Director
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Norwich, UK
Programs: A3*G, BA Gold, BD Gold (in memoriam), IHG Diamond Ambassador
Posts: 8,476
Folks, we have now done the PC/chivalry debate to death, and it really is not on topic for this thread given the central issue was the OP's decision to challenge the troublesome passenger's behaviour.
Let's get back to that aspect, please.
/mod
Let's get back to that aspect, please.
/mod
#73
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Arizona
Programs: BA (GGL G4L), AA (Gold), HH (Diamond); Marriott (Gold)
Posts: 3,011
OP, I would have handled it the same way. I think it's pretty hilarious that he was attempting to take Heineken with him from the lounge given that business class passengers do not pay for alcohol on board! I'm curious how they discovered the failed Heineken heist?
There are just a few obvious things from this incident that almost anyone should understand (something even my 3 year old understands about lounges):
There are just a few obvious things from this incident that almost anyone should understand (something even my 3 year old understands about lounges):
- If you're by far the loudest person in the room, maybe you should reduce your volume
- Vulgar language is generally not something to share with the world
#74
Join Date: Jul 2015
Programs: UA Platinum, Starbucks Gold
Posts: 873
OP, I would have handled it the same way. I think it's pretty hilarious that he was attempting to take Heineken with him from the lounge given that business class passengers do not pay for alcohol on board! I'm curious how they discovered the failed Heineken heist?
There are just a few obvious things from this incident that almost anyone should understand (something even my 3 year old understands about lounges):
There are just a few obvious things from this incident that almost anyone should understand (something even my 3 year old understands about lounges):
- If you're by far the loudest person in the room, maybe you should reduce your volume
- Vulgar language is generally not something to share with the world
#75
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,210
Well done OP!
However I am a bit surprised by the 'I had him immediately removed by the Customer services'.
It sounds like you had the power to go to CS and say 'get him out' - presumably this was not the case so I would be interested to know
- what you said to Cs
- what they did in terms of coming round, observing the person, given them a warning etc
- under which authority they searched the bag
However I am a bit surprised by the 'I had him immediately removed by the Customer services'.
It sounds like you had the power to go to CS and say 'get him out' - presumably this was not the case so I would be interested to know
- what you said to Cs
- what they did in terms of coming round, observing the person, given them a warning etc
- under which authority they searched the bag