Primarily here for your safety
#16
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 261
Pal of mine who is a 777 pilot having flown 747s for years, said to me one time, turn your phone off if it's foggy and cloudy bad weather. He had no agenda and no reason to tell me an untruth. So I reckon I'll go with his advice over yours
#19
Join Date: Jul 2014
Programs: Mucci de l'Arbitrage
Posts: 927
However what shocks me more in your story is that the crew did not at least pretend to care - for the sake of being polite and/or putting your mind at rest.
#22
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: COU
Programs: AA EXP, Bonvoy Ambassador, Hertz PC
Posts: 499
Oh wait, turns out your friend doesn't know what he's talking about.
A typical 777 carries ~350 people; a 747 over 400. Do you think since the advent of ubiquitous cell phones there was a single flight he ever took where nobody on the plane forgot to set a phone to airplane mode?
Can you list all the times a plane was compromised by a passenger's cell phone? I can: null set.
Can you cite the FAA regulation prohibiting cell phones on planes for safety reasons? No? Because there isn't one?
Can you explain why, if phones interfere with planes, pax are allowed to have the devices onboard at all, and why FAs are basically totally uninterested in whether they really get turned to airplane mode?
Can you even imagine the level of engineering malpractice it would require to build a passenger aircraft that is affected by errant RF signals in known licensed frequency bands?
Do planes lose avionics and navigation when they fly past radio and television towers?
This one's worth saying twice: can you name a single, sole, solitary instance of a plane ever having any problem whatsoever because of a cell phone not in airplane mode?
Last edited by HLCinCOU; Feb 3, 2017 at 4:23 pm Reason: Sorry, one line there was too mean.
#24
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: COU
Programs: AA EXP, Bonvoy Ambassador, Hertz PC
Posts: 499
For what it's worth, it hadn't occurred to me that the thrust of this concern might be the failure to pay attention to the briefing, rather than the electronics issue.
To the degree that's what the OP was worried about, OK, that's a lot more valid. Not the sort of thing I personally would worry about, but not crazy.
To the degree that's what the OP was worried about, OK, that's a lot more valid. Not the sort of thing I personally would worry about, but not crazy.
#25
Ambassador, British Airways; FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Leeds, UK
Programs: BA GGL/CCR, GfL, HH Diamond
Posts: 42,963
Btw, have you written to the FAA to give them the benefit of your technical expertise?
#27
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Krakow
Programs: BAEC Silver, Miles and More(FTL), IHG(Platinum), Accor, HHonors(Diamond), SPG, Hertz Five Star
Posts: 5,918
Can you cite the FAA regulation prohibiting cell phones on planes for safety reasons? No? Because there isn't one?
This one's worth saying twice: can you name a single, sole, solitary instance of a plane ever having any problem whatsoever because of a cell phone not in airplane mode?
This one's worth saying twice: can you name a single, sole, solitary instance of a plane ever having any problem whatsoever because of a cell phone not in airplane mode?
#28
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: COU
Programs: AA EXP, Bonvoy Ambassador, Hertz PC
Posts: 499
http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx....1.1.2.8.27.12
Btw, have you written to the FAA to give them the benefit of your technical expertise?
Btw, have you written to the FAA to give them the benefit of your technical expertise?
Wait, that's in Title 47, Telecommunications? And the chapter in question is titled Federal Communications Commission? Funny place for an FAA regulation...
Right. Exactly as I said before, the FCC prohibits phones on planes because of potential ground network interference. Which is pretty much moot with modern cellular networks. Good try though.
#29
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,210
Rather harsh I think?
I've flown on several airlines where 'safety rules' have been overlooked by cabin crew. Glasses not being collected is very common on departure/landing and on one flight where crew luggage was placed on the floor of one of the empty F seats for landing which I imagine is not allowed.
Such things don't bother me to be honest as there's more chance of my health and safety being jeopardised by my wife's cooking.
Having said that if the OP is confident that cabin crew blatantly ignored his appeal for action to be taken against the Russian (if he was definitely breaking safety rules) then he should complain. It has obviously been of some concern to him.
I've flown on several airlines where 'safety rules' have been overlooked by cabin crew. Glasses not being collected is very common on departure/landing and on one flight where crew luggage was placed on the floor of one of the empty F seats for landing which I imagine is not allowed.
Such things don't bother me to be honest as there's more chance of my health and safety being jeopardised by my wife's cooking.
Having said that if the OP is confident that cabin crew blatantly ignored his appeal for action to be taken against the Russian (if he was definitely breaking safety rules) then he should complain. It has obviously been of some concern to him.
#30
Join Date: Jul 2014
Programs: Mucci de l'Arbitrage
Posts: 927
http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx....1.1.2.8.27.12
Btw, have you written to the FAA to give them the benefit of your technical expertise?
Btw, have you written to the FAA to give them the benefit of your technical expertise?
The only reason I know that is enforced more strongly by the crew is in autoland mode. Someone on another thread explained why, with some diagrams etc.
Once again the thread is not about regulations and whether they should be followed or not, it's about the way the crew treated the OP.