Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Compensation - Fog, Delays, Bags

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 31, 2016, 3:12 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 15
Originally Posted by 13900
I'd like to see how well you'd fare when you have your usual passengers load but can fly only 50% of the program because the flow rate is 26 an hour and won't change for the whole day.

Being called useless was one of the kindest words I've been given when working in the airport during the disruption (c**t is the most frequent). I'd love to see anyone of those who rain down abuse on staff (for something beyond their control) in the staff's shoes.

​​​​​​​Well said. I feel for all airline staff who are going through this currently.
Taylorhmct is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2016, 3:13 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,835
Clearly getting aircraft out and back is a huge challenge in fog and there's not much that can be done about that, but why would baggage handling take so long?

I presume despite the fog being forecast a week in advance and the number of arrivals were only a fraction of a normal day (given cancellations) BA was unable to keep enough handlers working late. Hard to argue that aspect is outside their control.
Kgmm77 is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2016, 3:33 am
  #18  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: London/Frankfurt
Programs: BAEC Gold, Hyatt Gold
Posts: 181
Whoever handles BA's Twitter remains calm under fire:
Hi Dave, most of our disruption yesterday was caused due to fog. We're not aware of losing any cabin crew.
20Rothmans is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2016, 3:42 am
  #19  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Programs: BAEC (although I might just cut up the card)
Posts: 338
Originally Posted by Kgmm77
Clearly getting aircraft out and back is a huge challenge in fog and there's not much that can be done about that, but why would baggage handling take so long?

I presume despite the fog being forecast a week in advance and the number of arrivals were only a fraction of a normal day (given cancellations) BA was unable to keep enough handlers working late. Hard to argue that aspect is outside their control.
I wondered the same yesterday evening. As I said on my previous post (which will be serialized in the Sunday Times). I suspect (and it is purely speculation) that when the fog cleared BA (rightly) bulk cleared flights to get them out (probably many close to crew time limits). All those planes arriving so late at night, they probably just didn't have the staff on hand at that time of the evening to handle that.
r00ty is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2016, 4:31 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6,349
Originally Posted by rembrandtuk
My niece was due to be on easyJet from Amsterdam yesterday and by 11pm they were told to sort out their own accommodation and that they had no space to rebook onto alternate flights until Thursday.
Easyjet's 'duty of care' bill will be quite high on that then - 6 nights hotel rooms and meals etc for multiple people. Perhaps when the dust has settled they might pull their fingers out a bit.
simons1 is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2016, 4:35 am
  #21  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6,349
Originally Posted by Kgmm77
Clearly getting aircraft out and back is a huge challenge in fog and there's not much that can be done about that, but why would baggage handling take so long?

I presume despite the fog being forecast a week in advance and the number of arrivals were only a fraction of a normal day (given cancellations) BA was unable to keep enough handlers working late. Hard to argue that aspect is outside their control.
It isn't hard to argue at all.

The late arrival of many flights (after baggage handlers had gone home) was a direct result of the fog. Good luck to anyone trying to construct an argument there, personally I wouldn't waste the cost of a postage stamp.
simons1 is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2016, 4:42 am
  #22  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Programs: BAEC Gold
Posts: 692
Originally Posted by 13900
I'd like to see how well you'd fare when you have your usual passengers load but can fly only 50% of the program because the flow rate is 26 an hour and won't change for the whole day.

Being called useless was one of the kindest words I've been given when working in the airport during the disruption (c**t is the most frequent). I'd love to see anyone of those who rain down abuse on staff (for something beyond their control) in the staff's shoes.
Agreed. There's no excuse for abuse even in these situations.

However, lots of organisations, including my own, are let down by the lack of information provided during delays and disruption.

Rather than make everybody wait for and undertake a 1:1 discussion with staff to find out what they need to know, much better use could be use of 1:many information - taking the example from a previous poster whiteboards saying "go home and submit a baggage delay form online" could cut the queues by 50% or more and the frustration by 100%.

I had a long delay in PUJ last year and one could see the staff getting hassled by a procession of individuals asking for the same info ("when are we leaving"). The captain came into the terminal and addressed most of the passengers with detailed information and the mood lightened and the questions reduced.
PaulN is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2016, 6:14 am
  #23  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,835
Originally Posted by simons1
It isn't hard to argue at all.

The late arrival of many flights (after baggage handlers had gone home) was a direct result of the fog. Good luck to anyone trying to construct an argument there, personally I wouldn't waste the cost of a postage stamp.
I wasn't talking about compensation?

I was talking about BA's inability to flex baggage handling staff despite days notice of the weather.

None of what has happened of the last few days was a surprise. Yet BA is always left to survive on the wits & goodwill of its staff and passengers.

When you only have one product and one geographic location from which you trade, you really need to be excellent at recovering from stuff like this.

What is encouraging is that the rebooking element is definitely better than it was a few years ago.
Kgmm77 is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2016, 6:29 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6,349
Originally Posted by Kgmm77
I wasn't talking about compensation?

I was talking about BA's inability to flex baggage handling staff despite days notice of the weather.

None of what has happened of the last few days was a surprise. Yet BA is always left to survive on the wits & goodwill of its staff and passengers.

When you only have one product and one geographic location from which you trade, you really need to be excellent at recovering from stuff like this
BA can't win on this. If they decided a couple of days in advance to 'flex' the hours of handlers and then it turned out to be a clear day then exactly the same people would be on here to moan that there were insufficient staff in the daytime.

And whilst you may not have mentioned compensation there have been a few others that have.

As for the 'one geographic location' - don't people stranded in other locations count? Only people in Terminal 5 get affected by these things?
simons1 is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2016, 7:32 am
  #25  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,835
Originally Posted by simons1
As for the 'one geographic location' - don't people stranded in other locations count? Only people in Terminal 5 get affected by these things?
99.x% of BA flights start or end in London, that's what I meant by one location.

I suppose as someone who has spent half a working lifetime preparing organisations for stuff that's a lot less likely to happen than bad weather, I feel BA has areas it could improve significantly in these situations.

If it wanted to of course.
Kgmm77 is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2016, 7:42 am
  #26  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Programs: QF Platinum, NZ *G, Le Club Platinum, Hilton Diamond, Club Carlson Gold, SPG Gold
Posts: 286
Hi All

Thanks for the comments, appreciate the time being taken.

I won't go over point by pony as it will take a life of its own.

I wasn't actually looking for compensation, just clarifying as I wasn't sure, that's why I regard out to you folk over here on the BA forum.

With regard to the 747, I appreciate BA making h effort. As for the journey, it was OK. Short of course. Have to say I found the cabin old and dowdy (and dirty). The latter maybe due to turnaround. As someone who regularly flies F on QF and EK I get the feeling I'd be fairly disappointed if I'd paid for that long haul.

As for the general circumstances, for the record I just wore it. I didn't shout at staff, in fact I took a second to recognise to one that they must have had a long day and be tired. At the end of my very log and frustrating day where I'd paid good cash for a Club ticket I sat on the floor with many others and just waited, tired, thirsty and hungry. My reference to 'useless' was really the lack of anything communication wise - could have been so so much better. They must have had some idea as to the state of play when I checked in and simply being informed it was a .... show at LHR would have given me the personal choice to decide a plan if attack like rebook or take Eurostar. The useless part was the lack of communication and so on. I didn't find staff helpful and I did witness a BA staff member about at a group and the them to 'just shut up and listen' - that's not good enough.

Its a loose loose, but BA could have made more effort in my opinion to smooth things over. I do think the baggage delay is unacceptable. That's just opinion.

Again, thanks for the feedback. Happy New Year to all.
ssnz is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2016, 7:49 am
  #27  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: London
Programs: BA Silver IHG Platinum Elite
Posts: 176
Should have taken the train.....
quakered is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2016, 7:51 am
  #28  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Programs: QF Platinum, NZ *G, Le Club Platinum, Hilton Diamond, Club Carlson Gold, SPG Gold
Posts: 286
Originally Posted by quakered
Should have taken the train.....
Exaclty - and if I'd been given any indication by BA of the likely scenario I happily would have
ssnz is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.