Community
Wiki Posts
Search

BA WTP or AI J

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 31, 2016, 4:58 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SIN 5 days out of 7
Programs: BD*G, A3*G, BA-S, Accor Gold, IHG Amb
Posts: 5,505
Question BA WTP or AI J

Any of you got opinions on BA WT+ versus AI J (on 787)?

I found a few reviews but they're pretty old.

Thought it worth asking the BA regulars to here your side of the experience.
jbfield is offline  
Old Oct 31, 2016, 5:07 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Bedfordshire, UK
Programs: BA Gold, Geek platinum
Posts: 2,004
I would struggle to see how any business class, no matter how old, could be worse than BA premium economy.
Joely is offline  
Old Oct 31, 2016, 6:43 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,499
AI J, no contest. It's quite a good product on the 787.
Virazuno is offline  
Old Oct 31, 2016, 6:47 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Programs: Meh
Posts: 2,596
Odd question. Their J product is fine.
stevie is offline  
Old Oct 31, 2016, 7:26 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Programs: BAEC Gold
Posts: 1,166
Unless you need the Tier Points from BA, I'd take pretty much any business class product over WTP. WTP is nice and a big step up from economy, but most business class now offers a flat bed (or at least angled lie flat) which is a whole world apart.


Only issue with AI would potentially be operational reliability. Not sure how they are now, but the AI LHR-JFK leg used to sell extremely cheap fares but was well-known for lengthy delays and cancellations. If you care what time you get there, BA might just be safer...
ratypus is offline  
Old Oct 31, 2016, 9:46 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: BA GGL, A3*G, Mucci de l'expertise des Apps
Posts: 3,365
Depends if you want to fly on an airline with licenced pilots from a country with a reputable aviation oversight, or an airline from a country with an extremely poor aviation oversight reputation (rightly so) where the pilots licences may well have expired years ago, or even just been bought from the internet!

Ever since I had an Air India with a suspected cargo bay fire fly an hour away to an airport the company wanted them to go to rather than get it on the group ASAP, they are on my no fly list.
Airprox is offline  
Old Oct 31, 2016, 10:52 am
  #7  
Moderator: GLBT travelers, India-based Airlines and India; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Asia
Programs: Yes!
Posts: 15,512
Originally Posted by Virazuno
AI J, no contest. It's quite a good product on the 787.
+1. Flat bed in AI J versus the WT+ seat is no contest whatsoever.

Plus miles flown on AI can now be credited on all Star alliance carrier FFP's as well.
AJLondon is offline  
Old Oct 31, 2016, 11:54 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 279
AI is consistently the cheapest non-sale J (and economy) for LHR-EWR. Also on the 787. I'm surprised more FTers haven't picked up on this.
NeedstoFly is offline  
Old Oct 31, 2016, 11:55 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: London
Programs: BAEC, AA, Emirates, Hilton, Hyatt, Taj Hotels
Posts: 2,343
Depends on the cost differential really.

Personally I'd bite the bullet and go BA unless AI J was quite a bit cheaper. Anecdotally, AI are worse than useless when it comes to IRROPS so you can easily be stuck for days when things go wrong.

We do a lot of business in India and I don't know anyone in India who will touch AI - they are fine with Jet and the ME3 (usually EK) but AI is considered too unreliable - their words not mine.

Our own travel policy wouldn't allow it and they don't even show up on our TA quotes.
Betteronacamel is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.