Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Another Cut - CWLCY Arrivals Service

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 20, 2016, 1:06 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 5,655
Another Cut - CWLCY Arrivals Service

Heard from a reputable source, the CWLCY arrivals service at the Radisson is no more.

The cabin crew PAs have been altered to remove it.

Make of that what you will, in the context of all the others cuts. Not even the flagship route is exempt from the axe.
Dave_C is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2016, 1:11 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Wedged somewhere between BTS and VIE ✈
Programs: Star Alliance Gold (A3 Gold), Oneworld Emerald (BA Gold), Hilton Diamond
Posts: 6,338
Gets grimmer every day. I'm sure this cut will make the corporate bookers think very hard.
headingwest is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2016, 1:11 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ipswich
Posts: 7,543
Interesting.

Although from my POV, having tried it once, I wouldn't bother again. Might work well for some but it was too far and too much faff. Shame there there isn't a more convenient (and presmumably cheaper?) option.
windowontheAside is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2016, 1:27 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brighton, UK
Programs: BA Gold, IC Ambassador, HH Gold, SPG Gold, Fairmont Platinum
Posts: 3,166
Always a bit of an anomaly, was it actually much used?

BA have been getting rid of arrivals lounges for years to little protest. Who remembers the JNB or LGW arrivals lounges, both of which were in hotels like LCY?

IMHO if the usage doesn't merit it, cut it is the right decision.
FrancisA is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2016, 1:32 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brighton, UK
Programs: BA Gold, IC Ambassador, HH Gold, SPG Gold, Fairmont Platinum
Posts: 3,166
Originally Posted by headingwest
Gets grimmer every day. I'm sure this cut will make the corporate bookers think very hard.
About what exactly? Taking another airline that flies from the USA to LCY? Err. Or about rerouting to LHR to use the arrivals lounge there? Err.

I really think that this decision will do little more than cause a ripple in FT, largely amongst people who never actually used this, but can't miss an opportunity to bash BA for any decision however rational.
FrancisA is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2016, 1:36 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 11,571
It wouldn't cause a ripple if BA pulled a particular BEVVIE from the onboard bar if said BEVVIE was only popular with a certain number of pax.

But it would still affect those pax and prove to be a disappointment.

With each cut, more & more pax are dissatisfied with the product depending on their tastes and interests.
hugolover is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2016, 1:38 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: UK
Programs: BA, U2+, SK, AF/KL, IHG, Hilton, others gathering dust...
Posts: 2,552
I've used it on a number of occasions. It used to work quite well for me coming off BA2, could have a shower and breakfast and be at my office near the City by 9am. I don't fly to NYC as much as I used to, but if I had to work in London after coming off the flight, this would make me think twice about using LCY.

My experience was that 4-8 people would be using it coming off the flight. The service is still being advertised on ba.com.
Oaxaca is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2016, 1:41 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Wedged somewhere between BTS and VIE ✈
Programs: Star Alliance Gold (A3 Gold), Oneworld Emerald (BA Gold), Hilton Diamond
Posts: 6,338
Originally Posted by FrancisA
About what exactly? Taking another airline that flies from the USA to LCY? Err. Or about rerouting to LHR to use the arrivals lounge there? Err.

I really think that this decision will do little more than cause a ripple in FT, largely amongst people who never actually used this, but can't miss an opportunity to bash BA for any decision however rational.
If you're are referring to me, then you're right I never use it, but I'm sure there are plenty of corporate passengers who do before doing business in London.

But perhaps you're right, this is a good move by BA to help them on their new trajectory.
headingwest is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2016, 1:42 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: London, UK
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 2,279
Shame. A leisurely shower and brekkie before heading over to the wharf was a nice benefit of the service. Sure I can go shower and eat elsewhere. And sure, I'll probably still fly CWLCY for the decent sleeper service and proximity. But it leaves a sour taste...
TabTraveller is online now  
Old Aug 20, 2016, 1:51 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Gloucestershire
Programs: BA Gold (ex-GGL, maybe future Silver), Hilton Diamond
Posts: 6,197
It's not an issue for me because I live and work around the southwestern quadrant of the M25, but business class without the arrivals lounge is not the same.

I realise this is LCY only, for now, but if I was flying in from NY and visiting a client, or worked for a company that didn't have a shower facility on site, it would affect my decision of who to fly with.


(While that might force me into LHR if I was going to central London rather than Canary Wharf, but it would also remove part of the uniqueness of the BA proposition - so why not fly with someone else entirely and just land at LHR an hour or so earlier? I assume that UA and DL/VS have arrivals lounges...)

Sure, I can probably find a day room somewhere for relatively low cost, but that adds extra time to the journey so I may as well go to LHR.
Cymro is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2016, 1:54 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: UK
Programs: BA GGL, BA Amex Prem, Amex Plat, Hilton Diamond, Sir Crazy8534 de l'ordres des aides de Pucci
Posts: 4,451
Reading this as I wander past a long line of EK limos waiting to collect their newly arrived J and F passengers...
crazy8534 is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2016, 1:55 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Programs: QF Platinum & Lifetime Gold
Posts: 1,340
Originally Posted by FrancisA
IMHO if the usage doesn't merit it, cut it is the right decision.
Quite right, based on what their customers tell them and on customer demand, BA are to remove this service.

They are doing it for us and our sakes.
QF Lad is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2016, 1:57 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Wedged somewhere between BTS and VIE ✈
Programs: Star Alliance Gold (A3 Gold), Oneworld Emerald (BA Gold), Hilton Diamond
Posts: 6,338
Originally Posted by Cymro
Sure, I can probably find a day room somewhere for relatively low cost, but that adds extra time to the journey so I may as well go to LHR.
Exactly, and if enough passengers do that it might affect the viability of the LCY service.
headingwest is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2016, 3:23 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: London, UK
Programs: BAEC Silver, ITA Club Executive, Hilton Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 3,599
I'm really disappointed. We'll be flying back to LCY on the babybus in less than a couple of weeks and we were counting on going to the Radisson to have a shower before heading to work.
ringingup is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2016, 3:28 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: East Anglia, England
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 2,056
Perhaps they'll replace it with something or somewhere else. Otherwise, this is really another way to slowly wind down the service after the TP reduction enhancement.

H
Hoch is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.