Why isn't a coat acceptable as overhead baggage?
#31
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South East, UK
Programs: BA Gold / GfL, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 2,432
And as it's a minor grievance, why waste BA customer feedback with it? Being in a window seat, my options for dealing with my coat and the staff member involved were limited. Retraining of them is required, but I'm not going to go through the hassle of proper feedback to get them trained to do what the company should be training them to do.
How will BA know that "retraining of them is required" if no-one bothers to provide feedback?
#32
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: where lions are led by donkeys...
Programs: Lifetime Gold, Global Entry, Hertz PC, and my wallet
Posts: 20,340
I find this attitude strange. So it's a big enough issue for you to come to Flyertalk, start a new thread, explain in detail why you were so displeased, but not something you want to provide feedback to BA about.
How will BA know that "retraining of them is required" if no-one bothers to provide feedback?
How will BA know that "retraining of them is required" if no-one bothers to provide feedback?
Additionally had the OP complained to BA about this then they would probably have been jumped all over on FT for wasting BAs time for something so trivial.
#33
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Flatland
Programs: AA Lifetime Gold 1MM, BA Gold, UA Peon
Posts: 6,109
Isn't putting a coat on the floor, even under the seat in front, a safety hazard?
Some coats may have sleeves etc. sticking out especially if large and if an emergency occurred, someone could easily slip/trip on that coat, more so if smoke in a dark cabin with panicking people.
Some coats may have sleeves etc. sticking out especially if large and if an emergency occurred, someone could easily slip/trip on that coat, more so if smoke in a dark cabin with panicking people.
Or free bonus alcohol in the aisles when people lose control of their duty free.
#34
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South East, UK
Programs: BA Gold / GfL, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 2,432
In which case they would also have been given a hard time here too for simply whinging, which has not been the case here.
#35
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,714
Because a coat can be folded neatly on your lap, or placed under the seat infront, whereas a rollaboard cannot be folded neatly on your lap, or placed under the seat in front.
#36
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Thames Valley
Programs: BAEC, LHM&M, and even a dusty KLFB!
Posts: 893
Let us speculate briefly what response they would have had by giving BA some official feedback or making a complaint!
I found this particular aspect of BA's customer interaction so disappointing I gave up sending feedback or complaining (or indeed completing those emailed surveys) some time ago (other than the purely transactional "This flight's points have not credited")...
#37
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London
Posts: 6,265
I find this attitude strange. So it's a big enough issue for you to come to Flyertalk, start a new thread, explain in detail why you were so displeased, but not something you want to provide feedback to BA about.
How will BA know that "retraining of them is required" if no-one bothers to provide feedback?
How will BA know that "retraining of them is required" if no-one bothers to provide feedback?
That's after 10 responses back and forth to them and having to explain my issue multiple times.
#38
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,838
You can make an argument either way clearly, but unless it's a mitteleurope flight in winter, I don't think it's coats that are the cause of, or solution to, hand baggage problems.
#40
Join Date: May 2008
Location: PIS
Programs: BAEC Blue, and anything Amex Plat are dishing out
Posts: 253
Given the (lack of) cleanliness of BA planes is a very regular topic I do have sympathy with the OP not wanting to put his/her coat on the floor. And a lap isn't always appropriate either if the plane is already quite warm (another regular complaint).
#41
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Vale of Glamorgan
Programs: BAEC Gold
Posts: 2,991
The hand baggage policy on BA (and probably other airlines, although I rarely fly with anyone else) in a little unfair on passengers who travel with the minimum of hand baggage, as they have to put it under the seat in front of them, thereby restricting their own legroom.
On the other hand, those who board the plane with a couple of oversize cases on wheels and carrier bags of duty free get to put them in the overhead lockers and have nothing at their feet.
This would be much less of a problem if BA would only enforce their carry-on policy more strictly.
On the other hand, those who board the plane with a couple of oversize cases on wheels and carrier bags of duty free get to put them in the overhead lockers and have nothing at their feet.
This would be much less of a problem if BA would only enforce their carry-on policy more strictly.
#43
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Gold, AA EXP
Posts: 1,140
#44
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,208
I would have thought anyone who cares enough about their jacket or coat being creased or damaged would do that anyway. If I had an expensive coat from Primark and I didn't have a bag with me I wouldn't put it anywhere near the overhead locker for fear of it being damaged or stolen.
#45
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London
Programs: Mucci Grandee (Upgraded), BA Silver, AZ MilleMiglia
Posts: 3,107
If someone has no other carry on luggage, why should they be not allowed to put their coat in the overhead as their hand baggage?
(Further info that I've provided below)
Over zealous cabin crew who don't understand why a coat may be overhead and are too lazy to readjust it. Cabin announcements that announce all coats must be stored under your seat in front.
Flight attendant pulling coat out of locker, parading it around and announcing "whose jacket is this?", followed by a sharp and short "it must go under your seat in front of you" comment.
(Further info that I've provided below)
Over zealous cabin crew who don't understand why a coat may be overhead and are too lazy to readjust it. Cabin announcements that announce all coats must be stored under your seat in front.
Flight attendant pulling coat out of locker, parading it around and announcing "whose jacket is this?", followed by a sharp and short "it must go under your seat in front of you" comment.
So, in order to maximise the number of pieces of hand luggage that can be stored, the crew need to ensure that anything that is small enough to go under the seat in front, does go there.
So if you had put your coat in the overhead locker in a space that could have been occupied by a piece of luggage, it makes sense for the (larger) piece of luggage to have priority. If on the other hand you had put your coat on top of a piece of luggage that was already there, I don't think you'd have been asked to move it.