BA clamping down on missed final ex-EU sector [?]
Albeit hearsay, I thought the below would be of interest to FTers:
http://www.headforpoints.com/2015/07...ex-eu-tickets/ It's interesting that the author speculates that an immediate missed connection is less risky than a connection missed some distance into the future. |
Good luck to BA enforcing this in a German court of law. Will be very embarrassing for them indeed.
|
Totally unenforceable. Would love to see a test case on this soon so we can draw a line under it. Would love to see the judges face as BA try to argue their case. Maybe this would be the push the industry needs to sort out what is a ludicrous situation, including the more outrageous scenario of one ways costing more than a return on the same flight. Never mind dropping the last sector, I've often dropped the entire return portion (and got the taxes back on that!) 'cos it was cheaper than a one way fare.
|
Originally Posted by FlyingB1975
(Post 25142800)
Good luck to BA enforcing this in a German court of law. Will be very embarrassing for them indeed.
|
I find it hard to believe that the airline would be unable to force payment based on the journey actually undertaken rather than what was paid for. Trying to avoid paying the correct fare for the journey doesn't seem to be something that would expect courts to support
|
Originally Posted by BerksFlyer
(Post 25142873)
The article only speculates that it would be court action. What's more likely is that they would close down tour BAEC account and you lose all of your Avios, TPs and status. That's not difficult or embarrassing for BA at all.
|
Originally Posted by Dave Noble
(Post 25142874)
I find it hard to believe that the airline would be unable to force payment based on the journey actually undertaken rather than what was paid for. Trying to avoid paying the correct fare for the journey doesn't seem to be something that would expect courts to support
|
Originally Posted by miikkak
(Post 25142946)
In practice it's very complicated if one isn't BAEC member. Collecting the fare difference requires that they have enough information (address etc) to be able to send the bill which they often won't have if tickets are bought through OTA and paid through online banking.
|
As Raffles says, the cards that are marked are people who have delayed the return leg. (Although paradoxically I would have thought they are the ones who are most likely to fly it having changed it to a convenient time?)
As to enforcement: all BA need to do is 1. No TPs for that particular trip (good luck sorting that out 'in court' or 2. No more avios or TPs for you ever (again, the problem becomes the passenger's to try and beg forgiveness). If you've broken your leg and can't fly I'm sure BA will be happy to reverse their decision on production of medical evidence. |
Originally Posted by crazy8534
(Post 25142964)
If you've broken your leg and can't fly I'm sure BA will be happy to reverse their decision on production of medical evidence.
Also, I don't think BA can just say you can't earn Avios anymore. You're either a member of BAEC, or you're not. And if they decide you're not, that opens a pretty big can of worms. |
Originally Posted by miikkak
(Post 25142946)
In practice it's very complicated if one isn't BAEC member. Collecting the fare difference requires that they have enough information (address etc) to be able to send the bill which they often won't have if tickets are bought through OTA and paid through online banking.
If booked through an agent, it can send the agent an ADM and then leave it to the agent to address with the company/passenger that booked it |
We had a similar scare with CX http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/catha...itinerary.html . Nothing came of it since that discussion to date.
|
Originally Posted by Wozza2404
(Post 25142993)
Oh, I was actually joking about the note from my mum.
Also, I don't think BA can just say you can't earn Avios anymore. You're either a member of BAEC, or you're not. And if they decide you're not, that opens a pretty big can of worms. |
Whilst I didn't mention it in the article, BA is also planning to suspend travel agents who sell a disproportionately high number of 'dropped leg' flights, in the belief that the agents are actively encouraging such behaviour.
|
BA clamping down on missed final ex-EU sector [?]
If these are ex-Germany tickets I would assume it ends up in a German court. They have a history of shredding unfair airline terms and conditions, Lufthansa got a bloody nose a few times (they got a beating for just assuming that a ticket should be flown in the order in which it was ticketed).
As for closing down accounts. I wonder if BA would really send a CCR card holder to the competition over a missed segment. But ultimately it is their call and business judgement. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:25 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.