Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > British Airways | Executive Club
Reload this Page >

Is BA001 Club World London City worth it now?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Is BA001 Club World London City worth it now?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 3, 2015, 8:28 am
  #61  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: London
Programs: Don't even mention it. Grrrrrrr.
Posts: 968
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
In reality, there isn't much connection traffic on this service, I'm often the only passenger doing it. I use it for SFO and PHX, it's very well timed if starting at EDI.
That's a salient point - there is very little connecting traffic at all.

And yes it better start from T7 whilst my tentative grip on a CCR Card continues
Banana4321 is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2015, 8:29 am
  #62  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Munich, Algarve, Sussex or S.F Bay Area
Programs: Mucci, BA Gold, A3*Gold, AA Plat, HH Gold, IHG Plat Amb, Marriott Plat
Posts: 4,158
Like others, I find the quality of service on CWLCY generally better, although food is hit and miss. That Lamb I had last time was dreadfully overcooked.

Is it worth going out of the way for now there's "only" 140TP? No. It may have been when it was 210TP.

Does Preclearance in SNN save time in total. I would say generally not. Given that the aircraft must fuel enroute anyway, then preclearance is a good use of time while that is happening, but door-to-door I don't believe CWLCY is quicker unless you're in Canary Wharf anyway. In the other direction, JFK-LCY it is a different matter altogether.

I do agree however that landing at T8 after preclearance and US security would make it a major advantage. This would enable MCT to be reduced and enable more hassle-free JFK connections without requiring AirTrain and T8 security. But there again, with the number of passengers doing AA to BA in JFK, there is a lot to be said for both collocating in a single terminal anyway.
Tafflyer is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2015, 8:43 am
  #63  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: E14, LON
Programs: Virtuoso TA; SELECT TA; BAEC Gold; Hilton Honors Diamond; IHG Plantinum Amb
Posts: 237
I much prefer the BabyBus - I do find the service generally better and the food consistently great as well. My preference may well be skewed by the fact I live under 15 minutes away by cab from LCY and so can get to the airport about 30 minutes before departure without any worries. I also enjoy the service at JFK T7 check-in and gate which (although often very minimal interaction) is always pleasant and, I've always assumed, given by special services (given the lack of "uniform").

The extra tier points were great, but I'll continue choosing it over other options - even, normally, if I'm heading elsewhere in the US
poplarflyer is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2015, 10:06 am
  #64  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London
Programs: BA GGL (for now) and Lifetime Gold, Marriott fan thanks to Bonvoy Moments
Posts: 5,115
Originally Posted by sleeptalker
Hopefully a one-off, but we were led the wrong way on disembarking at JFK and ended up in the main immigration hall. Much confusion ensued, but the immigration staff were great in sorting things out pretty efficiently - a frustrating 20 minute-ish delay, however.
Friday 22nd? If it wasn't then not a one-off!
lorcancoyle is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2015, 10:14 am
  #65  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: London, UK
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 2,255
It'd be great if BA1 landed into LGA - that would make it an amazing flight. No Van Wyck. Easy connections to the rest of the east coast. Closer to Manhattan. I appreciate BA have no ground handling there but if distance restrictions are lifted on LGA this would make the flight a winner for me, even if they cut the TPs further still!
TabTraveller is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2015, 10:21 am
  #66  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: LHR
Programs: BA Gold, TG Gold, HHonors Diamond, SPG Plat
Posts: 8,665
Originally Posted by TabTraveller
It'd be great if BA1 landed into LGA - that would make it an amazing flight. No Van Wyck. Easy connections to the rest of the east coast. Closer to Manhattan. I appreciate BA have no ground handling there but if distance restrictions are lifted on LGA this would make the flight a winner for me, even if they cut the TPs further still!
Nothing to do with BA.
There is some strange rule that only flights under x miles can use LGA.

I know AA flight LGA to ORD and DFW but not further that. All LAX/SFO/LAS flights are to JFK (or EWR) not LGA. AA's MIA flights are also JFK based. Not sure about Delta's MIA flights.
KenJohn is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2015, 10:44 am
  #67  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: London, UK
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 2,255
Originally Posted by TabTraveller
It'd be great if BA1 landed into LGA - that would make it an amazing flight. No Van Wyck. Easy connections to the rest of the east coast. Closer to Manhattan. I appreciate BA have no ground handling there but if distance restrictions are lifted on LGA this would make the flight a winner for me, even if they cut the TPs further still!
Originally Posted by KenJohn
Nothing to do with BA.
There is some strange rule that only flights under x miles can use LGA.
Yup, as noted in my post. But they are considering lifting these.
TabTraveller is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2015, 12:32 pm
  #68  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: London
Programs: BAEC Silver
Posts: 37
Originally Posted by lorcancoyle
Friday 22nd? If it wasn't then not a one-off!
Yes, it was the 22nd. So hopefully it won't happen again!
sleeptalker is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2016, 5:26 am
  #69  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Wimbledon, UK
Programs: Budding BA Bronze, MPC Gold
Posts: 370
Sorry to bump an old thread...

Got a Lloyds upgrade voucher expiring soon and after all my searching it looks like the best use of it will be on the Babybus.

Is BA0001 still preferred by FT over BA0003? A friend went on it recently and wasn't too fussed about it but I think he was just being picky.

Just think it would make it a little more interesting than having the same dry bacon rolls in T5
yokozuma is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2016, 5:49 am
  #70  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: London
Programs: BAEC Silver, HH Diamond, Avis President's Club
Posts: 1,219
Originally Posted by yokozuma
Sorry to bump an old thread...

Got a Lloyds upgrade voucher expiring soon and after all my searching it looks like the best use of it will be on the Babybus.

Is BA0001 still preferred by FT over BA0003? A friend went on it recently and wasn't too fussed about it but I think he was just being picky.

Just think it would make it a little more interesting than having the same dry bacon rolls in T5
BA1 is preferred because BA3 doesn't have preclearance, but still has the SNN stop for refueling. Therefore there's not a timing advantage on this service, unless maybe you live next to LCY. The quality of service is the same though, and BA3 may be more convenient if you want to connect from elsewhere - a number of people have missed BA1 when flying in delayed from DUB beforehand.

Is it possible to use an upgrade voucher on the Babybus, being that there's no WT+ seats to upgrade from? I have no experience of this voucher so it may be that a TA is able to book and apply it or something, was just wondering.
Foltan is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2016, 5:53 am
  #71  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: UK
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 12,237
Originally Posted by yokozuma
Sorry to bump an old thread...

Got a Lloyds upgrade voucher expiring soon and after all my searching it looks like the best use of it will be on the Babybus.
How does a Lloyds Upgrade Voucher work on the Babybus? Do you book WT or WT+ ?
mikeyfly is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2016, 6:00 am
  #72  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Canary Wharf, London
Programs: MyWaitrose, IC Spire Ambassador, Hilton Diamond & BAEC Gold
Posts: 2,685
Originally Posted by mikeyfly
How does a Lloyds Upgrade Voucher work on the Babybus? Do you book WT or WT+ ?
You only need availability in CW, but pay the avios for WT+
chistery is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2016, 6:21 am
  #73  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ipswich
Posts: 7,543
It's a fun thing to do if you haven't tried it before. And I'd definitely pick BA1 over BA3 as pre-clearance makes a big difference.
windowontheAside is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2016, 7:05 am
  #74  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London
Programs: BA CCR/GGL, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 3,483
Originally Posted by chistery
You only need availability in CW, but pay the avios for WT+
Are you sure that's possible? When the service originally launched it was possible to UUA (or actually upgrade using miles, it was that long ago!) but after a while they closed that loophole on the basis that there wasn't a WT+ cabin to upgrade from.....
LondonAndy is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2016, 7:16 am
  #75  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Canary Wharf, London
Programs: MyWaitrose, IC Spire Ambassador, Hilton Diamond & BAEC Gold
Posts: 2,685
Originally Posted by LondonAndy
Are you sure that's possible? When the service originally launched it was possible to UUA (or actually upgrade using miles, it was that long ago!) but after a while they closed that loophole on the basis that there wasn't a WT+ cabin to upgrade from.....
Well I was surprised when my Lloyds voucher appeared a few weeks ago and I went to use it and the LCY CW flights were listed, as LCY flights are explicitly excluded in the T&Cs

I ended up booking a flight from LHR, but if I selected BA1 it showed the price of a WT+ Avios ticket.
chistery is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.