LCY Expansion to go ahead
#61
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London
Programs: Mucci. Nothing else matters.
Posts: 38,644
But here was an opportunity to make things very easy for a very common change: air <--> rail. But (like at a number of other airports in the UK) it will be more difficult than it need have been.
Maybe it's London's equivalent of the US' "all pax must clear immigration and customs at the first US port", regardless of where else they're going. Just as the US system sometimes seems to exude disbelief that an air passenger landing at a US airport might have the temerity to want to fly to another country without stepping foot in the US, London airports sometimes seem to exude disbelief that anyone who's got as far as the exit from customs might wish to go anywhere other than into London.
#62
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cumbria
Programs: BA, Marriott, Hertz, Dennis The Menace Fan Club
Posts: 2,015
Without wanting to take this to OMNI, don't forget that the SNP administration came to power in 2007, and then cancelled EARL [Edinburgh Airport Rail Link] and GARL [Glasgow Airport Rail Link]. The former of which would have put a station underneath the airport, which would have connected to the whole Scottish rail network ... and it was cancelled on the ground of cost as "the tram is a much cheaper project".
Indeed.
Indeed.
#63
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: London
Programs: BA Silver, IHG Spire, Radisson Gold
Posts: 991
Today has reminded me why I'd like an LCY lounge. I know you all wax about it being fast and convenient, and yes, I agree, but today for example I finished my affairs in London early, long before my flight to GLA.
I ended up going to Canary Wharf and sitting in Jubilee Park with a cup o' Starbucks for an hour or so - but it would have been nice to just head to LCY and crash in a lounge for a couple of hours.
On an unrelated note, what on earth have they done to LCY security?! Not sure when it started, but they now have some crazy arrangement whereby you queue at individual desks to speak with a security agent and put all your belongings in trays etc. - and the security agent then puts the trays on the belt whilst you go around seperately. The problem is, as there are several desks, the trays end up in a totally random order and thus the queues the other side rack up as people wait for all their trays to get through. Seems rather inefficient.
I ended up going to Canary Wharf and sitting in Jubilee Park with a cup o' Starbucks for an hour or so - but it would have been nice to just head to LCY and crash in a lounge for a couple of hours.
On an unrelated note, what on earth have they done to LCY security?! Not sure when it started, but they now have some crazy arrangement whereby you queue at individual desks to speak with a security agent and put all your belongings in trays etc. - and the security agent then puts the trays on the belt whilst you go around seperately. The problem is, as there are several desks, the trays end up in a totally random order and thus the queues the other side rack up as people wait for all their trays to get through. Seems rather inefficient.
#64
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brighton. UK
Programs: BA Gold / VS /IHG Diamond & Ambassador
Posts: 14,168
someone else posted this image earlier in the thread but it's worth posting again
https://constructionetc.files.wordpr...nnaught-ga.jpg
would those requesting a Cross Rail station at LCY please say where they think it would fit?
Factor in that CR trains will be 200 m long and that platforms should be in a straight length and that the tunnels etc to Woolwich have already started construction.
A stop at LCY would have already been included if it was cost effective and feasible to construct. It was neither.
https://constructionetc.files.wordpr...nnaught-ga.jpg
would those requesting a Cross Rail station at LCY please say where they think it would fit?
Factor in that CR trains will be 200 m long and that platforms should be in a straight length and that the tunnels etc to Woolwich have already started construction.
A stop at LCY would have already been included if it was cost effective and feasible to construct. It was neither.
#65
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: London
Posts: 17,007
#66
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: UK
Programs: BAEC GGL, HHonors Diamond, IHG Uninspired, Marriott Bonvoy Titanium, UK AMEX Plat
Posts: 2,151
someone else posted this image earlier in the thread but it's worth posting again
https://constructionetc.files.wordpr...nnaught-ga.jpg
would those requesting a Cross Rail station at LCY please say where they think it would fit?
https://constructionetc.files.wordpr...nnaught-ga.jpg
would those requesting a Cross Rail station at LCY please say where they think it would fit?
From the western edge of a station there, to the buildings at LCY looks under 250m, which seems fine to me compared to what you sometimes have to walk at T1/T2/T3, and significantly better than what you get a Manchester between the station and the BA terminal!
#67
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold, LH Sen, MUCCI, Junior Jet Club.
Posts: 8,095
And without wishing to drag us OT, but wanting to have a mini rant, both EA and GARL could have both been achieved for a fraction of the cost of the Edinburgh tram system if a station had been built close to the end of the respective runways. It didn't need an underground station or a separate terminal or any of the nonsense that was proposed. I'm sure the same logic could have been applied at LCY.
- underground station, at vast cost, and actually almost impossible because of the gradient trains would have to negotiate to get out of the tunnel onto the main line
- mainline station at the end of the runway - but then you'd have people like Globaliser moaning that the station was in the middle of nowhere and miles from the terminal
Ditto GLA - you don't have to run the line into the terminal at vast expense, but if you don't you'd again get the moans!
The fact is that there are very few 'green-field' UK airport developments which have taken place since inter-modal connections became viewed as important. STN is the only one I can think of which, surprise surprise, has an integrated railway station.
Ironically the reason LGW has a integrated railway station is that the airport was built on the site of a racecourse, which had its own station from 1891 (like Kempton Park does today) with the aerodrome opening in the 1920s.
#68
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: London. Edinburgh, Cornwall
Programs: BA GGL, British Midland Lifetime* Loser
Posts: 7,941
The problem with EARL was that the options were either
- underground station, at vast cost, and actually almost impossible because of the gradient trains would have to negotiate to get out of the tunnel onto the main line
- mainline station at the end of the runway - but then you'd have people like Globaliser moaning that the station was in the middle of nowhere and miles from the terminal
- underground station, at vast cost, and actually almost impossible because of the gradient trains would have to negotiate to get out of the tunnel onto the main line
- mainline station at the end of the runway - but then you'd have people like Globaliser moaning that the station was in the middle of nowhere and miles from the terminal
#69
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London Town
Programs: BA Silver, AF Silver
Posts: 465
Getting back to the original thread, I think expanding LCY is a perfectly fine idea, but expansion would need to include some kind of lounges. BA & Cityjet are the biggest operators with the most scope for expansion, no reason why lounges couldn't be baked into any expansion plan for both airlines and their partners.
I started commuting out of City almost 15 years ago, when there were just 9 gates, a single security point, one restaurant, and as an Air France status passenger I got a free shoe shine and free car parking. Those were the days.... Luckily, as the airport has expanded over the years, the facilities have improved and there are more food & drink options, and less space wasted on fashion retail. The problem for me is that the main departure lounge has not really increased much in size, hence the need for lounges.
At the same time, BA really needs to rethink its priority boarding here - making it Gold only is unfair to Silvers, who enjoy that minor perk at pretty much every other airport.
I started commuting out of City almost 15 years ago, when there were just 9 gates, a single security point, one restaurant, and as an Air France status passenger I got a free shoe shine and free car parking. Those were the days.... Luckily, as the airport has expanded over the years, the facilities have improved and there are more food & drink options, and less space wasted on fashion retail. The problem for me is that the main departure lounge has not really increased much in size, hence the need for lounges.
At the same time, BA really needs to rethink its priority boarding here - making it Gold only is unfair to Silvers, who enjoy that minor perk at pretty much every other airport.
#70
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: London
Posts: 17,007
Getting back to the original thread, I think expanding LCY is a perfectly fine idea, but expansion would need to include some kind of lounges. BA & Cityjet are the biggest operators with the most scope for expansion, no reason why lounges couldn't be baked into any expansion plan for both airlines and their partners.
I started commuting out of City almost 15 years ago, when there were just 9 gates, a single security point, one restaurant, and as an Air France status passenger I got a free shoe shine and free car parking. Those were the days.... Luckily, as the airport has expanded over the years, the facilities have improved and there are more food & drink options, and less space wasted on fashion retail. The problem for me is that the main departure lounge has not really increased much in size, hence the need for lounges.
At the same time, BA really needs to rethink its priority boarding here - making it Gold only is unfair to Silvers, who enjoy that minor perk at pretty much every other airport.
I started commuting out of City almost 15 years ago, when there were just 9 gates, a single security point, one restaurant, and as an Air France status passenger I got a free shoe shine and free car parking. Those were the days.... Luckily, as the airport has expanded over the years, the facilities have improved and there are more food & drink options, and less space wasted on fashion retail. The problem for me is that the main departure lounge has not really increased much in size, hence the need for lounges.
At the same time, BA really needs to rethink its priority boarding here - making it Gold only is unfair to Silvers, who enjoy that minor perk at pretty much every other airport.
#71
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: London. Or a plane.
Programs: "Only" 50,000 TPs until BA GGLfL
Posts: 2,773
#72
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,607
I don't think an A318 can reach Bermuda on account that it's rated for only 180 minutes ETOPS. This means on any route it flies it cannot be more than 180 minutes away from a suitable diversion airfield. Its fine until it gets to the mid Atlantic, I think, and then it just becomes too remote.
http://www.gcmap.com/mapui?P=lcy-bda...&EV=370&EU=kts
#75
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: London
Posts: 17,007