FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   British Airways | Executive Club (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/british-airways-executive-club-446/)
-   -   A380 Move to T3 [Rumour] (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/british-airways-executive-club/1624950-a380-move-t3-rumour.html)

BA5E Oct 31, 2014 3:05 am

A380 Move to T3 [Rumour]
 
Have heard snippets that maybe in due course the A380 will be moved to T3, is this just a rumour or is it in the pipeline to go from T5:td:

KARFA Oct 31, 2014 3:10 am


Originally Posted by BA5E (Post 23767627)
Have heard snippets that maybe in due course the A380 will be moved to T3, is this just a rumour or is it in the pipeline to go from T5:td:

As in all A380 flights or maybe one or two destinations? The former sounds very unlikely, the latter quite possible especially in a few years when BA are up to the full 12 and there are a few more destinations.

BA5E Oct 31, 2014 3:19 am


Originally Posted by KARFA (Post 23767638)
As in all A380 flights or maybe one or two destinations? The former sounds very unlikely, the latter quite possible especially in a few years when BA are up to the full 12 and there are a few more destinations.

Thanks for that, as enjoy the CCR visits, but if and when they do move a CCR replica will have to be added. :)

matthandy Oct 31, 2014 3:23 am

Surely the A380 flights are considered BA's flagship? Moving them to T3 would be an embarrassing move since passengers would not be able to make use of BA's flagship facilities at T5.

stevieed Oct 31, 2014 3:39 am


Originally Posted by matthandy (Post 23767668)
Surely the A380 flights are considered BA's flagship? Moving them to T3 would be an embarrassing move since passengers would not be able to make use of BA's flagship facilities at T5.

Agreed.

Come fly with us on our flagship aircraft from our home base. Just ignore the fact that you're getting inferior ground services as compared to T5.

Also, could the lounges at T3 cope with the influx of passengers?

Herman ze German Oct 31, 2014 3:40 am

at some point even the extraordinary becomes the ordinary. The 747 once was doing the flagship runs. With the full capacity of 12 A380 the Lounges at T5 would be cramped at some point so it may actually be good to move some flights to T3.
One crazy option though would be to allow F passengers to check in in T5 and then Bus them to the plane from A10

MickV Oct 31, 2014 3:49 am


Originally Posted by matthandy (Post 23767668)
Surely the A380 flights are considered BA's flagship? Moving them to T3 would be an embarrassing move since passengers would not be able to make use of BA's flagship facilities at T5.

Totally agree. Have always thought it was a bit of a design flaw having the Flagship plane so far from your flagship lounge.

shorthauldad Oct 31, 2014 3:50 am


Originally Posted by matthandy (Post 23767668)
Surely the A380 flights are considered BA's flagship?

Err ... why?

origin Oct 31, 2014 3:52 am


Originally Posted by shorthauldad (Post 23767749)
Err ... why?

Its a new airplane. BA are going to say its great for the next 50 years.

Also the room on board, is slightly bigger.

matthandy Oct 31, 2014 4:00 am


Originally Posted by shorthauldad (Post 23767749)
Err ... why?

Why not?

Which other routes/aircraft would be in the running?

uk1 Oct 31, 2014 4:04 am


Originally Posted by BA5E (Post 23767627)
Have heard snippets that maybe in due course the A380 will be moved to T3, is this just a rumour or is it in the pipeline to go from T5:td:

From what source did you hear the snippets please?

shorthauldad Oct 31, 2014 4:05 am


Originally Posted by matthandy (Post 23767776)
Why not? Which routes/aircraft would be in the running?

I don't understand needing to designate something with the description 'Flagship'. BA hardly use that word at all:

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=site%3Awww.brit...s.com+flagship

EDIT: maybe it's an FTer thing ?

EDIT2: LH use(d) the phrase ( http://a380.lufthansa.com/FASCINATIO...flug_entsteht/ ) about their A380. Maybe BA don't feel as proud ;)

matthandy Oct 31, 2014 4:10 am


Originally Posted by shorthauldad (Post 23767786)
I don't understand needing to designate something with the description 'Flagship'. BA hardly use that word at all

I'm very happy with my use of the word.

origin Oct 31, 2014 4:15 am


Originally Posted by shorthauldad (Post 23767786)
I don't understand needing to designate something with the description 'Flagship'. BA hardly use that word at all:

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=site%3Awww.brit...s.com+flagship

EDIT: maybe it's an FTer thing ?

EDIT2: LH use(d) the phrase ( http://a380.lufthansa.com/FASCINATIO...flug_entsteht/ ) about their A380. Maybe BA don't feel as proud ;)

I might be grumpy however


The Far Eastern city-state will be the latest destination to be served by the airline’s new flagship A380 service, from October 2014.
http://www.britishairways.com/en-gb/...s#.VFNhJ2dyaUk

shorthauldad Oct 31, 2014 4:24 am


Originally Posted by origin (Post 23767806)
I might be grumpy...

I didn't say BA never use the word, but hiding the word "flagship" in paragraph two of a press release rather proves the point I was trying to make, doesn't it?

Thinking about it, since BA also have the 787s, perhaps there's an agreement with Boeing not to talk about the A380 as their "flagship", hence it being filed under "our new aircraft" instead?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:19 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.