Gatwick Airbus Fleet
Just wondering if someone in the know here could answer this for me.
I believe next year the Gatwick SH programme will require about 25 Airbus A320/A319 aircraft. So far I can only account for 21, 10 leased A320(all arriving in next few months) and the 11 ex-BMI A319 aircraft, all of which have now positioned to Gatwick with the ending of LHR Terminal 1 SH Flights at BA. That leaves a need for another 4 aircraft. Will G-TTOB and G-TTOE be staying and supplemented by others as necessary? Or are there plans for 4 of the ex-BMI A320s to go to Gatwick next Summer? I know that G-MEDK is being disposed of next March. At the moment A320 G-EUYC is also flying out of Gatwick in the new 168 CY configuration. Finally any news of G-DBCF that was damaged at Alicante on 24th October? BA source wasn't sure if it was a bird strike or ground damage. As I said just being curious. Many thanks in advance for any information. V. |
Originally Posted by vectismanpaul
(Post 23737650)
the 11 ex-BMI A319 aircraft, all of which have now positioned to Gatwick with the ending of LHR Terminal 1 SH Flights at BA.
However, you're right that all 11 ex-BD A319s are now based at LGW, although only 1/6 ex-BD A320s are based at LGW. |
Many thanks Genuis1. I realised shortly after posting that some SH was still operating from LHR Terminal 1.
V. |
If all the SH ex-BMI move over to LGW next Summer that will make the numbers more or less correct. 16 A320 and 11 A319. We shall have to wait and see.
V. |
As G-MEDK is too low a standard for any other airline; may I offer my services to set light to it.
|
Originally Posted by tooblue
(Post 23738185)
As G-MEDK is too low a standard for any other airline; may I offer my services to set light to it.
|
Originally Posted by tooblue
(Post 23738185)
As G-MEDK is too low a standard for any other airline; may I offer my services to set light to it.
|
Once all of the mainline A319, A320 and shorthaul A321 aircraft are refurbished with the Pinnacle seats, I can see the ex-BD A319 and A320 aircraft being refurbished for product consistency as they go in for D checks.
I recognise that the principle driver for the current refurbishment is the additional capacity being introduced to mainline aircraft and that the ex-BD aircraft already have this capacity, but I still think BA will be considering this. |
Originally Posted by tooblue
(Post 23738185)
As G-MEDK is too low a standard for any other airline; may I offer my services to set light to it.
Originally Posted by layz
(Post 23738815)
It'd be fine with a proper refurbishment.
There are plenty of airplanes sitting in the California desert which could be "fine with a proper refurbishment". The Wright Bros "Flyer" would be "fine with a proper refurbishment". G-MEDK, as in service today, is abysmal. |
So does that mean all the 734's will have gone by next summer season ?
|
What's wrong with MEDK apart from the missing window at 01F (and maybe 29F)?
|
Originally Posted by BA6501
(Post 23739384)
What's wrong with MEDK apart from the missing window at 01F (and maybe 29F)?
|
Originally Posted by BA6501
(Post 23739384)
What's wrong with MEDK apart from the missing window at 01F (and maybe 29F)?
The curtain divider is I think also a bit non-standard in that it's fitted, but can't move further back than about row 9 due to a non standard emergency light fitted there. I think there's also something a bit strange in the way the tray tables at 1E/F are attached to the bulkhead. Seat pitch was also lower than the old CE cabins (along with the other ex-BMI A320 a/c I think, due to them having 6 more seats). |
Originally Posted by tooblue
(Post 23739003)
. . . and without a refurbishment (as it has been flying for about two years); it is a sub-Ryanair disgrace.
There are plenty of airplanes sitting in the California desert which could be "fine with a proper refurbishment". The Wright Bros "Flyer" would be "fine with a proper refurbishment". G-MEDK, as in service today, is abysmal. G-MEDK used to be a midhaul aircraft (the clue here is the G-MED* aircraft, which were mostly A321, belonged to BMED prior to the bmi takeover) and so in the bmi days was a welcome sight on shorthaul. The conversion of this aircraft to shorthaul was obviously rushed and they didn't care about things like reinstating windows where the wardrobes used to be. |
MEDK should be gone within about a year anyway, so it shouldn't have to be 'endured' for too much longer.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:11 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.