Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > British Airways | Executive Club
Reload this Page >

British Airlines using old rundown Boeing 747 on IAD to LHR flights!

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

British Airlines using old rundown Boeing 747 on IAD to LHR flights!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 1, 2014, 8:51 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 105
British Airways using old rundown Boeing 747 on IAD to LHR flights!

I WAS looking forward to my trip to Great Britain on British Airways in a few weeks until I read online that our flight will be on a 20 year old Boeing 747-400 plane. I read the plane is not updated and shakes and rattles all the time. In fact all of their Boeing 747 Fleet is from the 1985-1995 time period.

Is it really going to be that bad? (I will be flying way back in economy class with no chance of an upgrade)

Last edited by librarygal; May 1, 2014 at 9:14 am
librarygal is offline  
Old May 1, 2014, 8:54 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,166
Which class are you flying?

I think the airline is called (or known as) British Airways.

Yes, there are some pretty run down 747s out there, but BA is hardly alone in having old 744s, and they do have their advantages too.

I will add to this to say:

If you are flying in WTP, CW or First the quality of the product regardless of the aircraft is on par with anything else on that route.

If you are in WT, an economy seat is pretty much an economy seat throughout the World. BUT you will have 'free' alcoholic drinks on BA, which you won't with many other carriers.
InfiniteCycle is offline  
Old May 1, 2014, 8:56 am
  #3  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 954
Some are so run down and dirty on the inside. If needing to fly to IAD take UA or VS in business.
JohnnyUMF is offline  
Old May 1, 2014, 9:04 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 399
Originally Posted by JohnnyUMF
Some are so run down and dirty on the inside. If needing to fly to IAD take UA or VS in business.
Though strangely they both also have fleets of 747s, and United's covers almost the same age range as BA's, while VS's is slightly younger.
Now the likelihood of VS or UA using one on LHR-IAD is less than BA, but equipment swaps do happen.
Andy33 is offline  
Old May 1, 2014, 9:04 am
  #5  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,736
Originally Posted by librarygal
Is it really going to be that bad?
If you're going Club World, and in particular if you get the right seat, it's one of the best ways to fly - any class, any airline - and doubly so on an overnight trip. It's a personal choice I guess, but I'm a fairly seasoned traveller and I'd be on that Jumbo in a heart beat! It certainly shakes and rattles less than a 777, a noisy beast if ever there was one. It's true that some of them can look a bit worn, but if you get an aircraft which was recently serviced at the Cardiff workshop it looks and feels almost like new (though watch when you wash your hands: you can always tell if an aircraft has made a visit there by the high pressure water supply!).

The Queen of the Sky won't be around for much longer, I will miss her when she goes, if you haven't been on one I would suggest to suspend judgement, enjoy the ride and then tell us what you think.
corporate-wage-slave is online now  
Old May 1, 2014, 9:09 am
  #6  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 954
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
If you're going Club World, and in particular if you get the right seat, it's one of the best ways to fly - any class, any airline - and doubly so on an overnight trip. It's a personal choice I guess, but I'm a fairly seasoned traveller and I'd be on that Jumbo in a heart beat! It certainly shakes and rattles less than a 777, a noisy beast if ever there was one. It's true that some of them can look a bit worn, but if you get an aircraft which was recently serviced at the Cardiff workshop it looks and feels almost like new (though watch when you wash your hands: you can always tell if an aircraft has made a visit there by the high pressure water supply!).

The Queen of the Sky won't be around for much longer, I will miss her when she goes, if you haven't been on one I would suggest to suspend judgement, enjoy the ride and then tell us what you think.
This is a good point...get a window seat upper deck and its certainly a good way to go. I find that the aisle CW seats are really almost a class below. Its like a two tiered system, the aisle seats are awful, people climbing over you, no view, no privacy and stuff being handed over all the time to the window seat. They should almost charge less for the aisle seats, I think they are awful. I do think VS is better product overall if pricing is similar for you.
JohnnyUMF is offline  
Old May 1, 2014, 9:10 am
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Programs: Mucci des Hommes Magiques et Magnifiques
Posts: 19,072
Originally Posted by librarygal
I WAS looking forward to my trip to Great Britain on British Airlines in a few weeks until I read online that our flight will be on a 20 year old Boeing 747-400 plane. I read the plane is not updated and shakes and rattles all the time. In fact all of their Boeing 747 Fleet is from the 1985-1995 time period.

Is it really going to be that bad?
Who has been telling you that rubbish?
The B744 doesn't shake and rattle more than any other aircraft and in fact feels more stable than most.
If you are only used to flying with any of the American carriers you will probably be impressed.
Board with an open mind and have a great trip.
Can I help you is offline  
Old May 1, 2014, 9:10 am
  #8  
Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club, easyJet and Ryanair
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK/Las Vegas
Programs: BA Gold (GGL/CCR)
Posts: 15,914
Originally Posted by JohnnyUMF
Some are so run down and dirty on the inside. If needing to fly to IAD take UA or VS in business.
No thanks!
Tobias-UK is offline  
Old May 1, 2014, 9:16 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 769
The 747s were delivered from 1989-1999.

I think you've been reading generalised and ill-informed rubbish. That said, some of the fleet have seen better days but in reality it should't really affect you or the experience.
destere is offline  
Old May 1, 2014, 9:19 am
  #10  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 954
Originally Posted by Tobias-UK
No thanks!
Up to you but why not...very solid new business or first product?
JohnnyUMF is offline  
Old May 1, 2014, 9:43 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Bedfordshire, UK
Programs: BA Gold, Geek platinum
Posts: 2,004
Well if you are flying in economy then I will tell you that on my last flight on a 744 (a few weeks back) there was a big brown stain on the overhead bins above me, my IFE screen was barely visible and blacked out intermittently and whenever there was a cabin service announcement I was sent deaf as top volume static was screamed into my ears through the headphones. So judge of that what you will.

I don't fly CW and if at all possible, I try to find routes/flights operated by other aircraft. That said if you are in business or above you will be fine.
Joely is offline  
Old May 1, 2014, 9:43 am
  #12  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,736
Originally Posted by JohnnyUMF
Up to you but why not...very solid new business or first product?
Have you actually flown Virgin First yet? I can't say I have, but I'm familiar with VS Upper Class and it's not my favourite.
corporate-wage-slave is online now  
Old May 1, 2014, 10:08 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: London N3
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; VS Lifetime Gold
Posts: 222
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
Have you actually flown Virgin First yet? I can't say I have, but I'm familiar with VS Upper Class and it's not my favourite.

Speaking as one Lifetime Gold (VS) to another (BA), I find any Upper Class seat on a LGW fleet 747 or any A330 smarter, less claustrophobic and more comfortable than any seat in Club World with the exception of 64A and 64K; and the lounge, food, IFE and service are invariably better on VS anyway.

Of course if BA LCY-JFK is available at a decent fare, that's another matter...
vscxfan is offline  
Old May 1, 2014, 10:12 am
  #14  
TPJ
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Programs: TK*G (E+), IHG Plat Ambassador
Posts: 7,884
Hmmm.. UA, DL, LH, KL, CX, CI, LY, BR, VS, QF, MH, TG, CA, KE, OZ (plus most likely few others) all use B747-400... This is a good aircraft.
TPJ is offline  
Old May 1, 2014, 10:14 am
  #15  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
Aircraft are refurbished all the time, and a lot of the BA 747s have gone through their D-checks and are in great shape. As others have said, they are looking much better than an AA MD-90 or a UA 747, 767 or first generation 777.
LondonElite is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.