Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > British Airways | Executive Club
Reload this Page >

Back-to-back / Immediate Turnarounds at BA Destinations

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Aug 18, 2013, 2:36 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: LondonAndy
See also this thread:
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/briti...ing-guide.html
For details of suitable hotels for those doing a last flight/first flight turnaround, please see this thread:
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/briti...rt-hotels.html

Order: Back-to-back Transfer Landside Notes
[so Excellent for back to back usually means an easy airside transfer with few risks]
ABZ: Excellent Excellent if domestic, otherwise Reasonable Reasonable Arrivals decant into departure hall.
ACE: Reasonable if off season, there is a transfer channel just before passports Reasonable Reasonable
AGP: Excellent for Schengen, Risky if not. Schengen - immediate turnaround possible at gate area. Non-Schengen - There is a transit passageway back to airside on the left after passports, but there can be long delays at passports, achievable if you are willing to politely push in the queue.
see here.
ALC: Reasonable if off season, but you do need to go fully airside if non Schengen. Small and efficient airport. Peak time: see here.
ALG: Impractical due to visa and immigration processes. See post 2224.
AMS: Excellent Excellent Poor Arrivals decant into departure hall normally.
ANE: Good - very small airport, tarmac walk. You may want to telephone the airport to let them know since there's no OLCI facility.
ARN: Excellent Good Reasonable (arriving pax should watch for sign to gates 70-82) * see posts 593, 238 & 1298 for more details.
ATH: Reasonable but don't hang about, you need to enter Schengen immigration, then leave Schengen, and a fairly efficient security check. Distances aren't great.
BCN: Good to excellent - bit of a walk - small flight connection facility to the left of passport control, dedicated security but no passports Good if non-Schengen, Reasonable if Schengen Reasonable
BGO: Excellent Excellent Excellent, borderline foolproof though only restricted number of flights Arrivals decant into departure hall.
BHD: Excellent - use stairs upwards between gates 5 and 6, against flow Excellent if domestic, otherwise Reasonable Reasonable
BIO: Reasonable, does involve going landside but small airport, airbridge rather than bus Reasonable Reasonable
BIQ: Reasonable, involves going through passports to landside, security and passports again, but you need to be off early since passport checks are thorough.
BJV: Not really feasible, there is no online check-in or App facility, you must check in at the gate.
BOD: Reasonable but does involve going landside and back again. However it's a small airport and efficient.
BLL: Good (there is a clear transfer route after passport control to avoid a security check Good Good
BLQ: Good (small airport but you have to go landside) Reasonable Reasonable (bus gates)
BRI: Good (small airport but you have to go landside) Reasonable Reasonable
BSL: Good Good Good (Bit of a walk to landside, but it's not a huge airport. See this post for info).
BRU: Excellent on the transfer route, reasonable if not Reasonable Poor (see comments in post #246, also 64 onwards)
CAG: Reasonable, does involve going landside but small airport, airbridge rather than bus Reasonable Reasonable
CDG: Hopeless
CFU: Near impossible, no OLCI, you must present yourself at check-in. Process involves bus, passports, out to landside, short walk to departures building on right, security and bus. Security is bad on peak days.
CGN: No OLCI, but on some dates it is still possible. See this post for details.
CHQ: Near impossible despite being a small airport, no OLCI so you can only get a boarding pass at the airport, and bus to and from gates.
CMB: Easy to do airside. Arriving and departing pax are not segregated. If you have your return boarding pass, just walk directly from arrival gate to departure gate.
CMF: Generally Good, involves going landside. Best avoid Saturdays, the main changeover day, when security is stretched.
CPH: Excellent Good Reasonable Arrivals decant into departure hall.
CTA: Reasonable, there is a transfer route signed but seems obsolete. However small and efficient airport so still do-able if going via landside.
DBV: Impractical - there's no online check in here, you have to go landside and collect a boarding pass. Otherwise a very small airport.
DUB: Good (if ex-LHR), Reasonable if ex-LCY (quicker plane turnaround) Good if Common Travel Area, otherwise Reasonable Reasonable May require passing security, so Fast Track helps. See this post for a photo guide. (As of June 2017 increased risk due to pax segregation at 200 gates and ongoing building work)
DUS: Excellent Excellent if non-Schengen, Good if Schengen Good Arrivals decant into departure gate, though risk of bus to baggage hall.
EDI: Excellent Excellent if domestic, otherwise Reasonable to Poor Reasonable to Poor Arrivals decant into departure hall normally, risk of bus to baggage hall.
EGC: Impractical. Bergerac has its own check-in system and is currently not on App/OLCI, so boarding passes must be obtained in person, no later than 45 minutes before departure.
FCO: Reasonable (return shuttle to main terminal) Reasonable Reasonable
FDH: Impractical due to delays during ski season - see here.
FLR: Poor due to use of bus transfers and airport layout Poor - no transfer track Reasonable
FNC: Reasonable due to small airport and long turnarounds. You do need to go landside and return to airside. Note high risk of weather related diversions. Bus from aircraft, passports, security, passports, walk to aircraft.
FRA: Reasonable to Poor Poor (particularly if coming off Schengen) Reasonable
FSC: Uncertain - if boarding passes can be issued in advance then it will be an easy landside transfer in a tiny airport. If boarding passes can only be collected in FSC then it's impossible.
FUE: Reasonable if out of the peak season, airbridges used. Have to go via passports landside and security, behind check in. Try Canaries+Families security if desperate.
GIB: Good Good Good Must go landside, bearing right and back up through security. Turnaround can be long. Leave the aircraft early so as to beat the queue at passport arrivals.
GLA: Excellent Excellent if domestic, otherwise Reasonable Reasonable Arrivals decant into departure hall normally.
GNB: Good Good Good: Walk to/from aircraft. Must go landside, outside and right back into departures. Long turnaround times make this feasible though Saturdays busy.
GOA: Reasonable Reasonable Reasonable
GOT: Excellent Excellent Excellent Borderline foolproof. Arrivals decant into departure hall.
GVA: Excellent Good Good (but can be poor during ski season) Turn left in arrival lane to go back up to departures area.
HAJ: Excellent Excellent if non-Schengen, Good if Schengen Good Arrivals decant into departure gate. See posts 1670 and 1671 below.
HAM: Excellent Excellent if non-Schengen, Good if Schengen Reasonable Arrivals decant into departure hall, though sometimes bus to baggage hall.
HEL: Good Good Reasonable Incoming passengers can reverse direction just before Schengen passports. If a bus from gate, you will need to rush.
HER: Infeasible. There is no online or App check in, it's a bus transfer and arrivals / departures are in separate buildings.
INN: Good Good Good - you have to go landside, and there is a bus transfer to/from the aircraft, but the airport is very small and highly efficient.
INV: Good to Excellent Good Good - you have to go landside and through security. See here for more info.
IOM: Good Good Good (no flight connections but small airport)
IST: Good (visa not required) Good Poor (also note you may need to buy a visa as a result of going landside). More details in this post.
JER: Excellent Excellent if domestic, otherwise Good Good Arrivals decant into departure hall, sometimes you need to double back to the BA lounge.
JMK: Nearly impossible due to clunky arrival processing and use of buses.
JTR: Impossible: bus transfer, slow passports.
KEF: Excellent Excellent if non Schengen, Good otherwise Good BA flights tip arriving passengers into the departure gate. Foolproof. NB LCY flights pax use a bus from a remote stand, still easy as dropped off less than 100M from the departure gate.
KLX: Moderately risky due to boarding passes only being issued at check-in. No buses used normally, walk off plane straight into very small building.
LBA: Good Good Good have to go landside for any connection or b2b but small airport, see here for further details
LCA: Good Good Reasonable There is a "Connecting Flights" channel on the left of the arrivals corridor, half way along, well before passports.
LEI: Moderate to risky: you have to go via landside, and you need the return boarding pass before travel. But it's a small and efficient airport. No buses are used, it's similar to LCY in operation.
LHR T3: Good Good Reasonable Follow connecting flights route, which can be as quick as 11 mins from disembark to through security. No conformance unlike T5.
see here.
LIG: Good to Excellent Good Reasonable See this post for more information
LIS: Good Good Reasonable There is a security check to the right, immediately before and avoiding the passport desks. Risk of bus gates, but still OK.
LIN: Good Good Reasonable to Poor (bus gates)
LPA: Possibly OK if off peak. Some flights are bus gates, but it's a relatively small and efficient airport. OLCI and App check in both work.
LUX: Very Good Good Good Borderline excellent, no known fatalities. Landside route is described here: Airside transfer door described here.
MAD: Very good Good to Reasonable depending on arriving terminal Reasonable See this post for full details.
MAH: Good to excellent, see post number 563.
MAN: Reasonable to Poor Reasonable to Poor Reasonable to Poor
MCT: Excellent - direct transfer route [ ] [ ].
MJV: Good Good Good provided you avoid a peak time More information here.
MLA: Good Good Good This this post and linked blog for details.
MRS: Good Good Good There is a transfer and security point just before going down to passports. Use the phone on the post to ask for it to be opened it for you; however, there is no guarantee that it will and you may have to exit to landside and re-enter through departures security.
MUC: Very good Good but note 2 terminals Good Transfer point after passport, details in this post
MXP: Good - bit of walk to Transfer facility Good Good Thread links here.
NCE: Reasonable Poor Good [There is a direct transfer route by turning into the door way on the right before the slope up to passports]
NCL: Excellent Excellent if domestic, otherwise Good Good Arrivals decant into departure hall.
NTE: Good Good Good see this post.
NUE: Impractical unfortunately due to no OLCI, all check in done at the airport
OLB: Excellent Excellent Excellent Arriving into Olbia is via jetty to the departure gate, no passports or security. Note no OLCI via the App, more info here.
ORK: Good, do need to clear passports and security but very small and efficient airport.
ORY: No recommended due to fast turnarounds on LCY services. You have to go fully landside and back in again, via 2 passport checks and a security check.
OPO: Excellent [Look for grey escalator going up] Good (reasonable if Schengen) Reasonable
OTP: Excellent as at April 2019. Poor as of 29 Dec 18, see post #2660 https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/30586858-post2660.html.
Excellent - See post #1919 https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/29017017-post1919.htmlGood - look for Connection facility on right after leaving aircraft Reasonable Poor (can be Good if all everything works)
OSL: Good on the whole Reasonable Reasonable (See experiences in this post, this post, this post and this post.)
OVD: Not really suitable. This is really an Iberia Express route but leaves T5 under BA code. The aircraft is based in OVD not LHR. Small efficient airport though.
PFO: Good on the whole, but you do need to go landside. However it is a small airport. May not be so good on a busy Saturday during school holidays. Note bus transfers however.
PMO: Airport is currently being rebuilt. Once completed potentially a good option due to airbridge. Departure security is two floors above arrivals (use lift)
PMI: Excellent Excellent Excellent borderline foolproof - you are landed direct into boarding area.
PRG: Excellent ?? ?? For back-to-back the LHR-PRG arrival dumps you right into the main corridor of that pier; walk 100 ft. to security check for the BA boarding lounge and you'll be good to go.
PSA: Reasonable Reasonable Reasonable (not the best location since there are a lot of LCC and you have to reclear security from landside). (August 2018 review and comment)
PUY: Unrealistic, due to the bus transfer process followed by passport control.
RAK: Terrible Unknown See post #1353 below
RHO: Infeasible - no OLCI or App check in, bus transfers from gates. Also airport very busy on Saturday PM and Sunday AM.
RTM: Good Good Good (Reasonable during morning/evening peaks)
SEZ: Excellent, use the Transit desk at the right side of the immigration hall, opposite end to passport control, see this post.
SKG: Reasonable Reasonable Reasonable but note bus transfers on apron.
SOF: Excellent Excellent Reasonable arrivals decant into departure area.
SPU: Reasonable but there is a bus transfer and then landside Reasonable but transfer routes seems to be from Star Alliance Reasonable
STR: Reasonable - stairs from baggage hall back to security. Can't avoid security/passports Reasonable Reasonable Report here.
SVG: Excellent Excellent Excellent borderline foolproof, though only restricted number of flights
SVQ: Reasonable but need to exit landside and go up through departures, security. and passports is by the gate. Compact airport, fast security even if queuing.
SZG: Reasonable Reasonable Reasonable no transfer channel and note bus transfers, but small airport.
TFS: Reasonable but in all cases involves going landside. May be tricky to reclear security in peak holiday season.
TIA: Probably impractical. There is a bus transfer process and passport checks/stamps takes a while (Albania isn't in the EU).
TLL: Very good Good Reasonable see this post.
TLV: At your own risk. There is a transfer route with security on the way to passport control just after the rotunda.
TNG: No transfer or B2B route. Have to pass immigration, customs and security again. Airport is tiny (think 10 flights a day) and B2B is perfectly doable provided no problems at immigration.
TRN: Reasonable to Good Good Reasonable No short cuts to avoid going landside via passports x2 and security, apart from Fast Track security, but a small and efficient airport.
TXL: Good - security takes place in limited area by arriving gate Good Good Security is at gates, if using A gates. NB: Currently, this usually includes LCY flights, which now mostly use A gates like LHR flights.
UIP: Good - very small airport, tarmac walk.
VCE: Very good Good at offpeak times Reasonable See this post for details
VIE: Excellent (BEWARE see: https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/29579878-post2190.html ) Good Reasonable
VLC: Good Good Reasonable there's no transfer route so you have to go via landside. Departures is straight up from the arrival point. Disagree with the previous two sentences. For me, a direct turnaround from gates 12-14 was possible without going landside. Took less than a minute.
VNO: Excellent Good Reasonable arriving passengers enter departing passenger area. [BA have codeshare and also has TP Run options via AY]
VRN: Good Good Reasonable there's no transfer route so you have to go landside but it's a very small airport and there is Fast Track.
WAW: Good - small connection facility on left after airbridge Good Reasonable
ZAG: Very good Good Reasonable ask to use the International Transfer channel on the left side of the passport hall, you need a boarding pass/App. NOTE: New terminal just opened, so this info needs updating.
ZRH: Generally good but see this post and the replies for more information.
ZTH: Infeasible due to buses and no online check-in possibilities. Somewhat unfortunate given the small airport. No transfer route, you must enter Schengen and go to landside.

Excellent generally means you will leave the aircraft and find yourself in the boarding area for departure. Good suggests that you may have to clear either security and / or passports before reboarding, but it should still be possible.

Two caveats:
A) Sometimes things don't go to plan. E.g. EDI sometimes uses buses, which puts passengers landside and thus needing to reclear security. Ditto HAM.
B) The above needs to be combined with the turnaround time. MXP often has a generous back-to-back time, for example.

.
Print Wikipost

Back-to-back / Immediate Turnarounds at BA Destinations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 24, 2019, 4:50 am
  #2731  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London
Programs: Mucci. Nothing else matters.
Posts: 38,644
Originally Posted by SavvyTravel
Just feeding in our January 2019 B2B at Oslo as our experience seems to have been a bit different to the routes linked in the wiki.
>>>From the wiki : OSL: Good on the whole Reasonable Reasonable (see this post for more info and photos in this post.) <<<
I'm going to edit the wikipost because the information linked to is now very out of date.

I think that the long walk to passport control ends up being a zero-sum game, because inbound passport control is roughly above the end of that wing of the terminal (the gate F25 end). If you have to walk a long way from the gate to inbound passport control, the walk from outbound passport control to the gate should be correspondingly short.
Globaliser is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2019, 5:06 am
  #2732  
Ambassador, British Airways; FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Leeds, UK
Programs: BA GGL/CCR, GfL, HH Diamond
Posts: 42,917
Originally Posted by Globaliser
I'm going to edit the wikipost because the information linked to is now very out of date.

I think that the long walk to passport control ends up being a zero-sum game, because inbound passport control is roughly above the end of that wing of the terminal (the gate F25 end). If you have to walk a long way from the gate to inbound passport control, the walk from outbound passport control to the gate should be correspondingly short.
I thought there was a recent report of someone using the non-schnegen->non-schengen connection route recently so not needing to go through immigration? I will try and find it. I know there was a lot of work going on in that area over the last year or two so that route wasn't available for a while. I am slightly let down by my own knowledge for OSL as I haven't been for over a year now so no chance to see for myself.
KARFA is online now  
Old Jan 24, 2019, 5:07 am
  #2733  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London
Programs: Mucci. Nothing else matters.
Posts: 38,644
Originally Posted by Globaliser
And finally (amongst the scenarios I can think of off the top of my head), arrive at LHR after the long-haul, take luggage home, fly LCY-TXL-LCY carrying nothing, and then simply go home because LCY-TXL is the end of the long-haul ticket.
Originally Posted by AlienInTheFatherland
The wiki suggests that this is not so for LCY flights, since they potentailly get bussed: but throughout 2018 LCY has consistently used A12 and LHR has consistently used A13, both of which are airbridges, so I don't find that information very accurate any more.
I've recently done a LCY-TXL-LCY at the end of a trip, and we were on A12 as seems now to be the usual. There was a long gap between the flights (scheduled at 1:15), slightly whittled down by the aircraft running late earlier in the day, but even so it gave me time to walk four laps of the terminal before getting back through outbound immigration and security just in time for boarding to start for the flight back to LCY.

I've edited the wikipost to change the warning about LCY flights. The occasional use of a non-A gate seems (from earlier posts here) to apply to LHR flights too, in any event.

I also rediscovered just how liberating it is to do a trip carrying nothing more than a passport and two boarding passes. I had a couple of newspapers with me at the beginning, too, but they had been discarded by the time I got back to LCY.
Globaliser is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2019, 5:11 am
  #2734  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London
Programs: Mucci. Nothing else matters.
Posts: 38,644
Originally Posted by KARFA
I thought there was a recent report of someone using the non-schnegen->non-schengen connection route recently so not needing to go through immigration?
The route is there, and the non-Schengen --> non-Schengen security checkpoint still exists. My suspicion is that it is only in routine use when it is needed, and (as was my experience in December) if all other things look benign, it is probably faster for most of us to go through immigration in both directions than to wait for security to open up the non-Schengen security checkpoint.
Globaliser is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2019, 8:04 am
  #2735  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: UK
Programs: BA Silver (temp demotion), *A Silver, HH Gold, IHG Diamond
Posts: 490
Originally Posted by Globaliser
I'm going to edit the wikipost because the information linked to is now very out of date.

I think that the long walk to passport control ends up being a zero-sum game, because inbound passport control is roughly above the end of that wing of the terminal (the gate F25 end). If you have to walk a long way from the gate to inbound passport control, the walk from outbound passport control to the gate should be correspondingly short.
Yes, indeed. I think the 'experience' difference is that there are now potentially (stress) three bottlenecks/points to be slowed up. Inbound passport control; security check and outbound passport control. Having been through OSL twice in two weeks, we didn't see any queues at any point; despite the ubiquitous snake-like barriers!
SavvyTravel is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2019, 10:00 am
  #2736  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 266
Anyone with experience of CTA/Catania–Fontanarossa Airport? Is that what 'CAT' airport is in the Wiki?
FlyerTalker6823123456 is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2019, 1:54 pm
  #2737  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,760
Originally Posted by drakepassage
Anyone with experience of CTA/Catania–Fontanarossa Airport? Is that what 'CAT' airport is in the Wiki?
I'm almost certain that was a typo. CTA is a small airport but it will involve going landside. Do-able if you have your onward boarding pass and HBO, but it would be best to off the aircraft quickly.
corporate-wage-slave is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2019, 4:40 am
  #2738  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London
Programs: Mucci. Nothing else matters.
Posts: 38,644
Wikipost tidied up a little bit, mostly by reinstating the pipes to divide the categories in the case of airports whose ratings are divided into back-to-back, airside transfer and landside.

It's not a complete job, as in many cases it was impossible to work out whether the additional comments related to only one category.

CTA has been edited and put into its proper position, given c-w-s' comment. I have left in BGO and SVG for nostalgia's sake, but displayed with a strikeout.
Globaliser is offline  
Old Jan 26, 2019, 9:22 pm
  #2739  
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: The Smoke
Programs: BA GCH
Posts: 15
Anyone tried a B2B at OPO (Porto) recently ? Wiki suggests excellent as a B2B but the last post that i can see - which was a little while ago - suggested that a bus transfer (which i believe was for building work at the time) made it tight enough ? normally i would prefer to be there the night before but running out of options ..
Tenplus401 is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2019, 3:07 pm
  #2740  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Cayman, San Diego, London
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold, AA 4MM Lifetime Platinum, Hilton Diamond, IHG Diamond Amb, Bonvoy Lifetime Gold
Posts: 1,054
With the BA back-to-back turnaround in OSL about 50 mins (sometimes only 40 mins according to the scheduling), would it be your recommendation to play safe and not try for the immediate return on the same aircraft. It adds another 4 hours to the trip and the possibility that the later flight will be delayed, but avoids the hassle of rushing for the return and the possibility of getting stuck in OSL for the night.

Does anyone know if the BA OSL lounge is any good, please? With decent wi-fi the time would pass relatively quickly.
Full Score is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2019, 3:13 pm
  #2741  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,760
Originally Posted by Full Score
With the BA back-to-back turnaround in OSL about 50 mins (sometimes only 40 mins according to the scheduling), would it be your recommendation to play safe and not try for the immediate return on the same aircraft. It adds another 4 hours to the trip and the possibility that the later flight will be delayed, but avoids the hassle of rushing for the return and the possibility of getting stuck in OSL for the night.

Dies anyone know if the BA OSL lounge is any good, please? With decent wi-fi the time would pass relatively quickly.
You may want to read upthread why going for the next flight in 4 hours won't be playing safe, particularly on the first leg before a longhaul sector, it's a riskier thing to do. OSL is not the best place for B2B, ARN, CPH, HEL, GOT are all better locations and it would be worth paying a little more to use one of those locations instead. But B2B is a risk reduction process, hence this entire thread.

The Europe lounge thread has details on the OSL lounge, which is pleasant enough though not exactly world class. Yes it has wifi but not fast enough for long duration streaming.
corporate-wage-slave is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2019, 3:38 pm
  #2742  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Cayman, San Diego, London
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold, AA 4MM Lifetime Platinum, Hilton Diamond, IHG Diamond Amb, Bonvoy Lifetime Gold
Posts: 1,054
Thanks for the speedy response. It has to be Oslo as it’s the first leg of my RTW. (The 2nd leg will be days later, LHR-DXB). Avios journey into OSL

That’s why I said “playing safe”. Under these circumstances would you wait for the later flight, please?
Full Score is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2019, 3:52 pm
  #2743  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,760
Originally Posted by Full Score
That’s why I said “playing safe”. Under these circumstances would you wait for the later flight, please?
No I wouldn't. What would you do if your LHR-OSL was cancelled, the OSL-LHR continued to operate? If you don't make it to Oslo in time your RTW risks being canceleld as a result of you missing the first sector. You are doing the opposite of playing safe. If this makes you nervous then perhaps go the night before and stay over in OSL, since that provides multiple options if things go wrong. Or do a B2B. But adding 4 hours is the riskiest approach of the lot.
corporate-wage-slave is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2019, 6:55 pm
  #2744  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Cayman, San Diego, London
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold, AA 4MM Lifetime Platinum, Hilton Diamond, IHG Diamond Amb, Bonvoy Lifetime Gold
Posts: 1,054
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
No I wouldn't......adding 4 hours is the riskiest approach of the lot.
You make some very good points, particularly the one re the possibility of the LHR-OSL being cancelled. Thank you for your terrific advice.
Full Score is offline  
Old Jan 28, 2019, 3:06 am
  #2745  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chelsea
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 1,227
Originally Posted by drakepassage
Anyone with experience of CTA/Catania–Fontanarossa Airport? Is that what 'CAT' airport is in the Wiki?
I’d be very wary of Catania. The last two times I’ve been through on BA it was via a remote stand, and on one of these occasions we caught the tail end of an arrival from Russia which clogged up immigration until they arranged a separate EU queue (and for how much longer might that apply?!).

You’d then have to exit customs, upstairs, through security (which can look like a typical scene of Italian airport chaos but which usually moves fairly swiftly), back through immigration and (potentially) back onto a bus.

Not for the faint hearted!
BA235 is online now  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.