Originally Posted by T8191
(Post 18524278)
My only comment would be "They flew J???
And my other comment (;)) would be that I agree ... For groups of people like that, inevitably flying F, the cost is small change. Now ... About the normal poor people ... Put it another way, the difference between WT and WT+ is usually about £300-600 on a JFK-LHR flight. I reckon I'd rather spend that money on this service than upgrading the cabin. |
Of course this opens the interesting possibility that BA should (or could) offer this service free of charge for full fare F passengers.
|
Originally Posted by Sixth Freedom
(Post 18524472)
Of course this opens the interesting possibility that BA should (or could) offer this service free of charge for full fare F passengers.
However, I'm sure that the GCH community could lobby Theresa (be quick) for suitable recognition. Meanwhile, in other news, non-GCH can poke off at the UK Border? I'm not really getting this one, as it's getting a bit foggy. The UK Border is for everyone ... Yes? BAEC status is just a FFP ... Yes? Good, I hope we're agreed on that one :) |
Originally Posted by T8191
(Post 18524569)
Valid point. Does anyone pay full fare in F? A few Celebs, perhaps. Is there any trickle-down? Probably not ... Simply to many GCH to cope with.
However, I'm sure that the GCH community could lobby Theresa (be quick) for suitable recognition. Meanwhile, in other news, non-GCH can poke off at the UK Border? I'm not really getting this one, as it's getting a bit foggy. The UK Border is for everyone ... Yes? BAEC status is just a FFP ... Yes? Good, I hope we're agreed on that one :) How that will actually work in reality, I do not know. :confused: |
Long queues at T5 border control
It's not just T5, there were 20+ min waits at T3 this evening. Not helped, though, by someone dying/having extremely serious medical emergency about 5m in front of the e-passport gates.
|
Originally Posted by Stez
(Post 18524602)
I think there was a hint that less checks will be carried out on "trusted travellers" and mentioned members of a frequent flyer programme may fall into that group. Think this was mentioned in a Torygraph article.
How that will actually work in reality, I do not know. :confused: |
How frequent is frequent?
Seriously, that's flyerist. I'll pay the money just to stop being pi$$ed about. |
Do BRU-LHR pax need to go through immigration @ LHR (US Passports).
LHR is closer than St. Pancras to my destination - but I'm really not interested in a 60 minute delay at T5 around 2200 after arrival. |
Originally Posted by nyc6035
(Post 18524836)
Do BRU-LHR pax need to go through immigration @ LHR (US Passports).
LHR is closer than St. Pancras to my destination - but I'm really not interested in a 60 minute delay at T5 around 2200 after arrival. |
Originally Posted by stifle
(Post 18524858)
Yes. Why wouldn't they? Only passengers originating from the UK, Ireland, and Channel Islands are excepted from immigration control. Aside: technically speaking, if you are coming from Ireland and the Channel Islands and are not visa-exempt, you are supposed to find a UKBA officer somehow.
|
Originally Posted by T8191
(Post 18524741)
How frequent is frequent?
|
Originally Posted by T8191
(Post 18524741)
How frequent is frequent?
Seriously, that's flyerist. I'll pay the money just to stop being pi$$ed about. |
Came through London City yesterday, the usual 2 minutes for us all to get through immigration.
Now regarding the stories about just three officers being on duty at Heathrow T5 and similar - there were also three officers on duty here at LCY, for handling just the periodic arrivals here. One officer got hung up on a difficult case from our flight, and the common queue (which LCY seems to manage fine, unlike T5 with all its space available) was thus processed by the other two. You do have to therefore wonder what the respective establishments of officers at T5 and LCY are, compared to the passenger numbers, and wonder why the discrepancy, and why one seems to be organised so much more sensibly than the other. |
Originally Posted by WHBM
(Post 18526951)
Came through London City yesterday, the usual 2 minutes for us all to get through immigration.
Now regarding the stories about just three officers being on duty at Heathrow T5 and similar - there were also three officers on duty here at LCY, for handling just the periodic arrivals here. One officer got hung up on a difficult case from our flight, and the common queue (which LCY seems to manage fine, unlike T5 with all its space available) was thus processed by the other two. You do have to therefore wonder what the respective establishments of officers at T5 and LCY are, compared to the passenger numbers, and wonder why the discrepancy, and why one seems to be organised so much more sensibly than the other. T |
Originally Posted by T8191
(Post 18524907)
Interesting ... I'm British, with a British passport and arriving from a British Crown Dependency ... Do you have a reference?
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:57 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.