BA 274 -11/19 Inedible food in F!
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Southern California
Programs: Alaska MVP 75K, Delta Plat, Bonvoy Ambasador, Hilton diamond.
Posts: 527
BA 274 -11/19 Inedible food in F!
I just got off BA 274 from Las Vegas in new first...flight was run by a young mixed fleet crew. They were certainly VERY polite and extremely enthusiastic but sadly fell short on the meal service. They just don't know how to use the ovens @ 40,000 feet. 7 passengers in F, all barely touched their dinners...and NOBODY dared to try a warm breakfast.
The scallop starter was burnt on the outside. When I took a bite it was actually crunchy to the point that I thought there were pieces of shell embedded.
The "fresh salad leaves" were good, although that's not what I ordered (asked for the Crab salad)...a mistake I can easily forgive since I know they'd have corrected the miscommunication immediately. The "fresh salad leaves" were drowning in dressing...not sure if that's the way it catered but it made only 30% of the salad edible. The portion not completely submerged in dressing.
The main course was painful. My "Chicken Korma" was comparable to old 'take out' with dried out hard rice. My father's "filet of beef" had a bizarre aftertaste & smell to it, I can't quite describe it...to call it chewy would be an understatement. His potatoes were undercooked (really hard)...or so overcooked as to cause them to become that way.
desert was not offered...
Some of the other comments I overheard were.
"...you've brought this soup out to me twice now COLD", and "this beef does not quite taste right", "the bread is frozen", "the bread is stale".
The crew was of course very apologetic blaming the ovens and that they'd have engineers check them but lets face it...the ovens were not broken. Water boils at a lower temperature @ altitude. I squarely blame BA for setting these mixed fleet crews up for failure. It was clear that they had minimal knowledge of the aircraft (fumbling with lights, etc).
Question is, should I even bother contacting customer relations @ BA? Is there a point?
The scallop starter was burnt on the outside. When I took a bite it was actually crunchy to the point that I thought there were pieces of shell embedded.
The "fresh salad leaves" were good, although that's not what I ordered (asked for the Crab salad)...a mistake I can easily forgive since I know they'd have corrected the miscommunication immediately. The "fresh salad leaves" were drowning in dressing...not sure if that's the way it catered but it made only 30% of the salad edible. The portion not completely submerged in dressing.
The main course was painful. My "Chicken Korma" was comparable to old 'take out' with dried out hard rice. My father's "filet of beef" had a bizarre aftertaste & smell to it, I can't quite describe it...to call it chewy would be an understatement. His potatoes were undercooked (really hard)...or so overcooked as to cause them to become that way.
desert was not offered...
Some of the other comments I overheard were.
"...you've brought this soup out to me twice now COLD", and "this beef does not quite taste right", "the bread is frozen", "the bread is stale".
The crew was of course very apologetic blaming the ovens and that they'd have engineers check them but lets face it...the ovens were not broken. Water boils at a lower temperature @ altitude. I squarely blame BA for setting these mixed fleet crews up for failure. It was clear that they had minimal knowledge of the aircraft (fumbling with lights, etc).
Question is, should I even bother contacting customer relations @ BA? Is there a point?
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: The Hague, NL
Programs: GMLFL, Life 2.0 - Mucci Premiere Classe & des Chevaliers Toulousiens
Posts: 22,911
#4
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Edinburgh
Programs: BA Exec Club,Skywards,Hilton Honours,Mariott Rewards,SPG
Posts: 956
#5
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: MUCCI
Posts: 1,922
Hi there,
If it was genuinely this bad then you really should send either and email or letter to customer relations or call BA. This is not what F is about and it is a shame that although very enthusiastic the crew were not able to offer a decent meal service. There is no excuse for cold soup for example........
FD.
If it was genuinely this bad then you really should send either and email or letter to customer relations or call BA. This is not what F is about and it is a shame that although very enthusiastic the crew were not able to offer a decent meal service. There is no excuse for cold soup for example........
FD.
#6
Join Date: May 2005
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 93
I had a similar experience out of Atlanta in September. Crew didn't have a clue and the entire meal service took nearly 4 hours on an overnight flight. Even then the food was either under or over cooked. Deserts missed too and no hot towels either, the list goes on. I actually complained to the captain as I waited for the loo and received a call from CS a few days later. I relayed my list of complaints, including my comments on the service out from LHR. Looks like MF needs to be avoided if at all possible, in First anyway.
#7
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: JAX / MUC / BER
Programs: DL DM, LH SEN, Mariott Titanium
Posts: 369
#8
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,208
It's not only with Mixed Fleet this can happen on.
We had a couple of stinkers in F SYD-LHR where the food and service was not up to scratch. Thankfully all flights since have been very good.
We had a couple of stinkers in F SYD-LHR where the food and service was not up to scratch. Thankfully all flights since have been very good.
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2002
Programs: Mucci des Hommes Magiques et Magnifiques
Posts: 19,092
I agree and if you are not happy on any flight please let BA know.
Can I please ask if you are ever unhappy onboard that you let the pursers or CSD/CM/CSM’s know and give us a chance to rectify the problem there and then?
Can I please ask if you are ever unhappy onboard that you let the pursers or CSD/CM/CSM’s know and give us a chance to rectify the problem there and then?
#10
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: EDI
Posts: 792
For sure, you should make a bit stink.
Look at it this way- you've paid a huge premium for a crap meal. When you consider what F really offers, you're essentially paying thousands of pounds for a bad meal, at the best of times - and when it goes wrong, there's all the more reason to be outraged.
Look at it this way- you've paid a huge premium for a crap meal. When you consider what F really offers, you're essentially paying thousands of pounds for a bad meal, at the best of times - and when it goes wrong, there's all the more reason to be outraged.
#11
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Earth
Programs: Proud owner of 3 Mucci's (yes, 3!) the latest being Chevaliere des Bains Chauds, BA Silver (6 yrs)
Posts: 10,985
Do you truly believe you pay just for the meal in F?
#12
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: EDI
Posts: 792
I can't think of any other benefit!
The seats aren't sufficiently different to J (keeping in mind I sleep soundly in CW).
What does F provide that J can't? All I can think of is a smaller cabin (J has never bothered me); better food (£1000-2500 better? I'd expect Gordon Ramsey himself!); a larger seat (meh, I sleep well in CW).
What else am I missing?
Unless I'm missing anything revolutionary - you're paying a premium of a grand or two for dinner. A bad dinner!
The seats aren't sufficiently different to J (keeping in mind I sleep soundly in CW).
What does F provide that J can't? All I can think of is a smaller cabin (J has never bothered me); better food (£1000-2500 better? I'd expect Gordon Ramsey himself!); a larger seat (meh, I sleep well in CW).
What else am I missing?
Unless I'm missing anything revolutionary - you're paying a premium of a grand or two for dinner. A bad dinner!
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2007
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 12,046
The seat is significantly more comfortable and spacious than CW. And that is, I think, what you are really paying for.
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2002
Programs: Mucci des Hommes Magiques et Magnifiques
Posts: 19,092
I can't think of any other benefit!
The seats aren't sufficiently different to J (keeping in mind I sleep soundly in CW).
What does F provide that J can't? All I can think of is a smaller cabin (J has never bothered me); better food (£1000-2500 better? I'd expect Gordon Ramsey himself!); a larger seat (meh, I sleep well in CW).
What else am I missing?
Unless I'm missing anything revolutionary - you're paying a premium of a grand or two for dinner. A bad dinner!
The seats aren't sufficiently different to J (keeping in mind I sleep soundly in CW).
What does F provide that J can't? All I can think of is a smaller cabin (J has never bothered me); better food (£1000-2500 better? I'd expect Gordon Ramsey himself!); a larger seat (meh, I sleep well in CW).
What else am I missing?
Unless I'm missing anything revolutionary - you're paying a premium of a grand or two for dinner. A bad dinner!
#15
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Earth
Programs: Proud owner of 3 Mucci's (yes, 3!) the latest being Chevaliere des Bains Chauds, BA Silver (6 yrs)
Posts: 10,985
I agree and think the cabin is more exclusive with just 14 seats. The UD is great, especially in 64K, but those extra 6 seats take away a little of the exclusivity you get in F.
On the ground when travelling F you get CCR at LHR, choice of seats at time of booking, exclusive check in area, etc.
I've not travelled in New F yet but have adored my two F trips and the food meant less than 10% to me (but was superb). It was the rest of the experience that was really special.
Some people prefer CW (obviously jghill is one of those) and that's fine too.
That said, if the OP was unhappy - and clearly had reason to be - then he should undoubtedly let BA know.