Community
Wiki Posts
Search

BA 274 -11/19 Inedible food in F!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 20, 2011, 9:46 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Southern California
Programs: Alaska MVP 75K, Delta Plat, Bonvoy Ambasador, Hilton diamond.
Posts: 527
BA 274 -11/19 Inedible food in F!

I just got off BA 274 from Las Vegas in new first...flight was run by a young mixed fleet crew. They were certainly VERY polite and extremely enthusiastic but sadly fell short on the meal service. They just don't know how to use the ovens @ 40,000 feet. 7 passengers in F, all barely touched their dinners...and NOBODY dared to try a warm breakfast.

The scallop starter was burnt on the outside. When I took a bite it was actually crunchy to the point that I thought there were pieces of shell embedded.

The "fresh salad leaves" were good, although that's not what I ordered (asked for the Crab salad)...a mistake I can easily forgive since I know they'd have corrected the miscommunication immediately. The "fresh salad leaves" were drowning in dressing...not sure if that's the way it catered but it made only 30% of the salad edible. The portion not completely submerged in dressing.

The main course was painful. My "Chicken Korma" was comparable to old 'take out' with dried out hard rice. My father's "filet of beef" had a bizarre aftertaste & smell to it, I can't quite describe it...to call it chewy would be an understatement. His potatoes were undercooked (really hard)...or so overcooked as to cause them to become that way.

desert was not offered...

Some of the other comments I overheard were.

"...you've brought this soup out to me twice now COLD", and "this beef does not quite taste right", "the bread is frozen", "the bread is stale".

The crew was of course very apologetic blaming the ovens and that they'd have engineers check them but lets face it...the ovens were not broken. Water boils at a lower temperature @ altitude. I squarely blame BA for setting these mixed fleet crews up for failure. It was clear that they had minimal knowledge of the aircraft (fumbling with lights, etc).

Question is, should I even bother contacting customer relations @ BA? Is there a point?
bubu-SNA is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2011, 9:59 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Programs: Mucci des Hommes Magiques et Magnifiques
Posts: 19,092
Yes, absolutely.
Can I help you is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2011, 10:00 am
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: The Hague, NL
Programs: GMLFL, Life 2.0 - Mucci Premiere Classe & des Chevaliers Toulousiens
Posts: 22,911
Originally Posted by bubu-SNA
Question is, should I even bother contacting customer relations @ BA? Is there a point?
Yes. If not for yourself than for BA and the next pax flying F.
henkybaby is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2011, 10:14 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Edinburgh
Programs: BA Exec Club,Skywards,Hilton Honours,Mariott Rewards,SPG
Posts: 956
Originally Posted by henkybaby
Yes. If not for yourself than for BA and the next pax flying F.
I agree totally YES. I've been on the receiving end of some equally inedible food in F on a few sectors and always complained.

Having said that the last couple of trips this year the food in F was better.
stevie-d is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2011, 10:20 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: MUCCI
Posts: 1,922
Hi there,
If it was genuinely this bad then you really should send either and email or letter to customer relations or call BA. This is not what F is about and it is a shame that although very enthusiastic the crew were not able to offer a decent meal service. There is no excuse for cold soup for example........
FD.
Flying Doctor is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2011, 10:40 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 93
I had a similar experience out of Atlanta in September. Crew didn't have a clue and the entire meal service took nearly 4 hours on an overnight flight. Even then the food was either under or over cooked. Deserts missed too and no hot towels either, the list goes on. I actually complained to the captain as I waited for the loo and received a call from CS a few days later. I relayed my list of complaints, including my comments on the service out from LHR. Looks like MF needs to be avoided if at all possible, in First anyway.
BASW5 is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2011, 10:49 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: JAX / MUC / BER
Programs: DL DM, LH SEN, Mariott Titanium
Posts: 369
Originally Posted by bubu-SNA
they had minimal knowledge of the aircraft (fumbling with lights, etc).

Question is, should I even bother contacting customer relations @ BA? Is there a point?
Yes. They need to know this and they should get their ... together to not have this happen.
KP2006 is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2011, 10:57 am
  #8  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,208
It's not only with Mixed Fleet this can happen on.

We had a couple of stinkers in F SYD-LHR where the food and service was not up to scratch. Thankfully all flights since have been very good.
HIDDY is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2011, 11:05 am
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Programs: Mucci des Hommes Magiques et Magnifiques
Posts: 19,092
I agree and if you are not happy on any flight please let BA know.
Can I please ask if you are ever unhappy onboard that you let the pursers or CSD/CM/CSM’s know and give us a chance to rectify the problem there and then?
Can I help you is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2011, 11:08 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: EDI
Posts: 792
For sure, you should make a bit stink.

Look at it this way- you've paid a huge premium for a crap meal. When you consider what F really offers, you're essentially paying thousands of pounds for a bad meal, at the best of times - and when it goes wrong, there's all the more reason to be outraged.
fife is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2011, 11:10 am
  #11  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Earth
Programs: Proud owner of 3 Mucci's (yes, 3!) the latest being Chevaliere des Bains Chauds, BA Silver (6 yrs)
Posts: 10,985
Originally Posted by jghill
Look at it this way- you've paid a huge premium for a crap meal. When you consider what F really offers, you're essentially paying thousands of pounds for a bad meal, at the best of times - and when it goes wrong, there's all the more reason to be outraged.
Do you truly believe you pay just for the meal in F?
sunrisegirl is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2011, 11:23 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: EDI
Posts: 792
Originally Posted by sunrisegirl
Do you truly believe you pay just for the meal in F?
I can't think of any other benefit!

The seats aren't sufficiently different to J (keeping in mind I sleep soundly in CW).

What does F provide that J can't? All I can think of is a smaller cabin (J has never bothered me); better food (£1000-2500 better? I'd expect Gordon Ramsey himself!); a larger seat (meh, I sleep well in CW).

What else am I missing?

Unless I'm missing anything revolutionary - you're paying a premium of a grand or two for dinner. A bad dinner!
fife is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2011, 11:23 am
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2007
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 12,046
Originally Posted by jghill
Look at it this way- you've paid a huge premium for a crap meal. When you consider what F really offers, you're essentially paying thousands of pounds for a bad meal, at the best of times - and when it goes wrong, there's all the more reason to be outraged.
F offers a lot more than just the catering. Anyway, you could have just as bad a meal in CW, WTP or WT.

The seat is significantly more comfortable and spacious than CW. And that is, I think, what you are really paying for.

Sixth Freedom is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2011, 11:27 am
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Programs: Mucci des Hommes Magiques et Magnifiques
Posts: 19,092
Originally Posted by jghill
I can't think of any other benefit!

The seats aren't sufficiently different to J (keeping in mind I sleep soundly in CW).

What does F provide that J can't? All I can think of is a smaller cabin (J has never bothered me); better food (£1000-2500 better? I'd expect Gordon Ramsey himself!); a larger seat (meh, I sleep well in CW).

What else am I missing?

Unless I'm missing anything revolutionary - you're paying a premium of a grand or two for dinner. A bad dinner!
In a way I agree with you, if you cannot see the reason for travelling First then you are best to travel in Club.
Can I help you is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2011, 11:33 am
  #15  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Earth
Programs: Proud owner of 3 Mucci's (yes, 3!) the latest being Chevaliere des Bains Chauds, BA Silver (6 yrs)
Posts: 10,985
Originally Posted by Sixth Freedom
F offers a lot more than just the catering. Anyway, you could have just as bad a meal in CW, WTP or WT.

The seat is significantly more comfortable and spacious than CW. And that is, I think, what you are really paying for.


I agree and think the cabin is more exclusive with just 14 seats. The UD is great, especially in 64K, but those extra 6 seats take away a little of the exclusivity you get in F.

On the ground when travelling F you get CCR at LHR, choice of seats at time of booking, exclusive check in area, etc.

I've not travelled in New F yet but have adored my two F trips and the food meant less than 10% to me (but was superb). It was the rest of the experience that was really special.

Some people prefer CW (obviously jghill is one of those) and that's fine too.

That said, if the OP was unhappy - and clearly had reason to be - then he should undoubtedly let BA know.
sunrisegirl is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.