Humiliated businesswoman frog-marched off British Airways flight in row over mobile
#31
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Home: East Mids UK - Work (Base): Accra, Ghana.
Programs: BAEC: Silver - Marriott: Titanium
Posts: 12,086
I wish I could say that to passengers...!
Admittedly, I do not have many issues with phones, maybe it is the way I ask, but most people happily switch them off... the occasional grunt or "but it's in flight safe mode" retort... to which I say that all electronic equipment is to be switched off for take off and landing, as per the video... oh yes, that would be the video that you did not watch, as you were playing with your phone... funny that! (Kidding... I don't really say that...!)
#32
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,648
I confess to knowing precisely zero about the technical issues involved, but I fervently hope that no-one will ever be able to prove that using mobiles on aeroplanes is safe, or will ever come up with a technical advance to make them so. If that happened the airlines would be under tremendous pressure from business customers to allow their use on board for conversations as well as silent uses such as texting, email etc.
#33
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: back to my roots in Scotland!
Programs: Tamsin - what else is there to say?
Posts: 47,843
I am curious to know (I'm sure there is a good reason) why mobile phones can be placed into flight-safe mode (if they have this feature) for take off, however all devices (including phones with flight-safe mode) need to be switched off completely for landing. Anyone know?
However, on approach to an airport, an aircraft will be (usually) landing using the ILS - Instrument Landing System. It's effectively following a (radar?) beam from the airport, which tells the aircraft where it is in relation to the airport - how far out, what heading, what altitude. This is used to guide the aircraft into the airport and ensure it is lined up correctly on the runway. ILS are quite sensitive things - they are safeguarded fiercly, and even within the airport, there is a clear area maintained around the ILS to ensure that nothing interferes with the beam - having been working on an airport where we accidentally set fire to the grass within the ILS zone, and had permission refused from ATC to enter it to put it out as they had aircraft on approach and so couldn't risk either turning the ILS off or scatter to the beam, then I'm aware of how fiercely these are guarded! (the fire went out by itself, much to our relief, that we didn't need to alert the fire service to what we had been up to as we'd never have been able to live it down ). So anything which could interfere with reception of the ILS on board would also be a huge no-no!
Hopefully the pilots will be along to correct anything wrong I've said - while I had to consider the effects ILS had on the airfield, I only had the whole system explained to me one drunken evening in a bar somewhere. And although Ive watched RAF Precision Approach with awe (and jealousy, it is exactly like a game!), I've never seen civilian ATC in action...
#34
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Europe
Programs: Mucci, BAEC Gold, Aegean Gold
Posts: 2,115
Well now you have. Not my video and thus I disclaim the lame music at the outset.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rft5lh2LWLY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rft5lh2LWLY
#35
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Canary Wharf, London
Programs: MyWaitrose, IC Spire Ambassador, Hilton Diamond & BAEC Gold
Posts: 2,685
I am curious to know (I'm sure there is a good reason) why mobile phones can be placed into flight-safe mode (if they have this feature) for take off, however all devices (including phones with flight-safe mode) need to be switched off completely for landing. Anyone know?
#37
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 762
Interesting... I think that is far from clear from the briefing, whether done over the PAS, through the video, or both....
#38
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,919
Excuse me I may have misunderstood but she had turned off the phone and was inquiring about his details BEFORE the FA ENTERED the cockpit and had her thrown out!!! Right??
1) If they were still at the gate the FA should have had no trouble with her since she turned it off BEFORE going to taxi
2) if they were already on the taxiway - then what the H*** was the FA doing opening the door to the cockpit anyway! Post 9/11 regulations require those doors to be secured BEFORE leaving the gate!
OK now what did I miss???
1) If they were still at the gate the FA should have had no trouble with her since she turned it off BEFORE going to taxi
2) if they were already on the taxiway - then what the H*** was the FA doing opening the door to the cockpit anyway! Post 9/11 regulations require those doors to be secured BEFORE leaving the gate!
OK now what did I miss???
#39
Join Date: May 2004
Programs: BA blue, LH Senator, KQ (FB) gold
Posts: 8,215
Quite. I'm almost 100% sure that every aircraft (including BAs) is carrying some phones that are not switched off on every takeoff and landing, and how many have crashed as a result? None I guess. And if they were a real risk, surely all phones would be confiscated at security and handed back on arrival. Unfeasible? Sure, but so is checking everyone for liquids...
#40
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,648
Before I get flamed, I'm not advocating leaving them on, but I'm sure that many do and on a full B747 or A380 there could easily be 50 or so ringing away and receiving texts during takeoff and landing. If there really is a danger I'd rather they were all off!
#41
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: LHR/SIN/CGK
Programs: BAEC GGL & CCR
Posts: 580
What I find just as infuriating as PAX using their phones when they have been instructed not to are those who jabber on throughout the pre-flight safety demo.
Surely these extremely rude people have just proved they are incapable of following simple crew instructions, so for safety reasons should be slung-off post-haste! ^
Surely these extremely rude people have just proved they are incapable of following simple crew instructions, so for safety reasons should be slung-off post-haste! ^
#42
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mostly AUS or rural England
Programs: BAEC redundant Bronze, AAdvantage Lifetime PLT, CO, WN, B6
Posts: 6,526
I think the real issue is it takes maybe 3 or 4 simultaneous failures to cause an accident. If you think about the Turkish 737 that ploughed into the polder outside Schipol recently, it had a faulty radio altimeter, but it took at least a combination of this with a high initial approach, some unforgiving design of the auto power retardation system and (probably) some distraction of the crew before they got into a catastrophic condition. The point with shutting off sources of EMI is you're aiming to remove the risk of, for example, adding the straw that breaks the camels back by minimising interference with ILS, altimeter or SatNav systems - the aircraft can and often is flown with faults but the more problems that line up, the greater the risk of striking terrafirma.
#43
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Home: East Mids UK - Work (Base): Accra, Ghana.
Programs: BAEC: Silver - Marriott: Titanium
Posts: 12,086
Excuse me I may have misunderstood but she had turned off the phone and was inquiring about his details BEFORE the FA ENTERED the cockpit and had her thrown out!!! Right??
1) If they were still at the gate the FA should have had no trouble with her since she turned it off BEFORE going to taxi
2) if they were already on the taxiway - then what the H*** was the FA doing opening the door to the cockpit anyway! Post 9/11 regulations require those doors to be secured BEFORE leaving the gate!
OK now what did I miss???
1) If they were still at the gate the FA should have had no trouble with her since she turned it off BEFORE going to taxi
2) if they were already on the taxiway - then what the H*** was the FA doing opening the door to the cockpit anyway! Post 9/11 regulations require those doors to be secured BEFORE leaving the gate!
OK now what did I miss???
The "FA" can not just open the flight deck door, well, at least not on Main Line BA, I appreciate this is Comair, but we have to request access. So it is not a case of just opening the door... I would imagine it would be similar in other airlines.
#44
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Home: East Mids UK - Work (Base): Accra, Ghana.
Programs: BAEC: Silver - Marriott: Titanium
Posts: 12,086
What I find just as infuriating as PAX using their phones when they have been instructed not to are those who jabber on throughout the pre-flight safety demo.
Surely these extremely rude people have just proved they are incapable of following simple crew instructions, so for safety reasons should be slung-off post-haste! ^
Surely these extremely rude people have just proved they are incapable of following simple crew instructions, so for safety reasons should be slung-off post-haste! ^
I had a rather prolonged discussion with a lady in 2J on the 767 (Short Haul variant, obviously...) I asked her to put her hand bag into the overhead locker for take off. She was rather rude about it, and decided to stuff it backwards, under her own seat, thus, pushing her life jacket back out of reach, with the handles to her hand bag sticking out.
I told her that it was not really acceptable to do that... when she asked why, I told her...
"Well, unfortunately, if this aircraft has to ditch in the north sea on the way to Stockholm, and I shout the command to "Unfasten your seat belt! Grab your life jacket! Come this way!", grabbing your hand bag, will most certainly not keep you afloat in the water for very long."
Thankfully, she saw sense and had a little grin of admission on her face.
But it does make me wonder how these people will react to instructions when it comes to the nitty gritty. We have all seen, and know, that there has been several BA incidents recently, and passenger reaction is always something that is investigated post incident, so we will see what the feedback is.
#45
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London
Posts: 6,265
Bottom line is that there is evidence that phones *can* cause interference (as can some other electronic devices). It's best that they are switched off.