Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > bmi | Diamond Club
Reload this Page >

Worth suffering Egyptair for a taste of The Business on bmi?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Worth suffering Egyptair for a taste of The Business on bmi?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2009, 10:56 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Gold (and other non-status plastic)
Posts: 1,889
Worth suffering Egyptair for a taste of The Business on bmi?

Am looking to book a self-funded J class LON-KUL or LON-SIN in June. TK has some nice fares for GBP1500 inc tax (incl the Jet Airways 777 flatbeds for some segments). However, I also unearthed some fantastic MS fares for 1250 or so, also valid on BD LHR-CAI codeshares, which will be then be operated by the ex-MAN A330s. Here are the pros and cons, as I see it:

(-) MS has a terrible reputation...
(+) ...but this is a bargain way to experience fully flat beds and chef service between LHR-CAI on bmi

(-) MS C seating likened to first generation premium economy...
(+) ...at least CAI-KUL is on the 330 with slightly better seats (c.f. UA old biz)

(-) Connection in CAI - chaos and awful lounges
(+) CAI T3 should be open by Easter (wishful thinking?)

(-) 14 hour connection each way in CAI
(+) Could nip out to see some pyramids, or MS is (haphazardly) reported to offer hotel rooms for long layovers

(-) An awfully painful way to get from LHR-KUL
(+) 28k+ status miles for the price of a modest dinner party at Gordon Ramsay, Royal Hospital Road

So... MS/BD or TK? Any thoughts?
kt74 is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2009, 11:03 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: BHD/DUB
Programs: BA Gold, TK*G, EI Elite
Posts: 7,622
Decision, decisions.........I hope you enjoy your trip on the TK 77W.
FlyingOnceMore is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2009, 11:30 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SIN 5 days out of 7
Programs: BD*G, A3*G, BA-S, Accor Gold, IHG Amb
Posts: 5,505
What's the point in going in J if you're not going to enjoy a lot/most of it?

Go with TK.
Fly bmi to CAI when you want to go to CAI.
jbfield is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2009, 11:46 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Manchester, England
Programs: Bonvoy LT Plat, HH Diamond, IHG Plat, BMI Gold (RIP)
Posts: 8,021
MS all the way!












Ok, seriously there is no decision here. TK, TK or TK.
RAPC is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2009, 11:51 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SIN 5 days out of 7
Programs: BD*G, A3*G, BA-S, Accor Gold, IHG Amb
Posts: 5,505
BTW. Your (+)'s look more like hopeful excuses to ease the pain.
jbfield is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2009, 11:59 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Manchester, England
Programs: Bonvoy LT Plat, HH Diamond, IHG Plat, BMI Gold (RIP)
Posts: 8,021
Originally Posted by jbfield
BTW. Your (+)'s look more like hopeful excuses to ease the pain.
Yep - sounds rather like "I was burgled, but at least they didn't steal the TV"
RAPC is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2009, 12:25 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SE1, London
Posts: 23,433
TK. A nice airline, decent hub airport, proper flat beds for some sectors. Seems a no brainer for a GBP250 supplement.

Plus, I have a horrible fear that 'The Business' to CAI will feature the very iffy mid-haul catering rather than the stellar TA (and BOM ) offerings.

Last edited by Swanhunter; Mar 15, 2009 at 2:09 pm
Swanhunter is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2009, 1:44 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: PMI
Programs: BA,LH,CX,EK SPG,IC mainly and a few others
Posts: 1,862
Originally Posted by Swanhunter
TK. A nice airline, decent hub airport, proper flat beds for some sectors. Seems a no brainer for a GBP250 supplement.

Plus, I have a horrible fear that 'The Business' to CAI which feature the very iffy mid-haul catering rather than the stellar TA (and BOM ) offerings.
Would second that. TK is not that bad for the price they charge.
I was tempted by the MS fares to JNB and BKK, but what I read about the seats put me off.
CAI airport is a nightmare compared to IST, and while MS staff was very friendly, the seats leave a lot to be desired for a good nights sleep.
LonLH is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2009, 3:31 pm
  #9  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Gold (and other non-status plastic)
Posts: 1,889
Originally Posted by jbfield
BTW. Your (+)'s look more like hopeful excuses to ease the pain.
You lot know me sooo well

I never got to experience the Biz T/A or to BOM, so was kinda hoping I would find a reason to give it a go... Guess this isn't one of them!

TK it is then...
kt74 is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2009, 5:25 pm
  #10  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 23
Originally Posted by kt74
(-) MS C seating likened to first generation premium economy...
(+) ...at least CAI-KUL is on the 330 with slightly better seats (c.f. UA old biz)
The J seats on the A330 are MUCH better than the 772, and are proper business seats. I believe 60". People here are quick to dismiss MS but I think they shouldn't be discounted so quickly.

My friend Paul Tucker would go MS definitely.
Tunde Baiyewu is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2009, 5:35 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northern Ireland (in spirit), but much more likely GB or Europe.
Programs: EI Aer Club, IB Plus, BA EC, AAdvantage
Posts: 769
Can't believe nobody's mentioned this yet but MS are a dry airline which is a big no no in my book.
BHDBOY is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2009, 5:54 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Scotland
Programs: PC Spire Amb, HH Diamond, A3 Gold, Cathay Gold
Posts: 187
Have posted a previous TR with pics of my last MS status run. Doing the same for re-acquiring Gold in four weeks coincidentally, KUL-LHR in the A330 to CAI and on to LHR in F (yes 300%) in the 777. Price is not bad for one way esp since the other leg is in cash and miles F with SQ . Think it's worth the effort. Food is not much but it is still a nice wide seat and staff are friendly. I'll post another TR on return, SQ F vs MS F .

airline is dry but you can byob.
golsquare is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2009, 6:19 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northern Ireland (in spirit), but much more likely GB or Europe.
Programs: EI Aer Club, IB Plus, BA EC, AAdvantage
Posts: 769
Originally Posted by golsquare

airline is dry but you can byob.
BYOB is fine for house parties but not when flying Business Class. I appreciate that MS don't serve alcohol for religious reasons- that's the culture of their home nation, I respect that. However as a westerner I would come away feeling that a significant element of a C class cabin service is missing.

(Maybe just like DELLAS after his no-meal trip!)
BHDBOY is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2009, 2:57 am
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SE1, London
Posts: 23,433
Originally Posted by Tunde Baiyewu
The J seats on the A330 are MUCH better than the 772, and are proper business seats. I believe 60". People here are quick to dismiss MS but I think they shouldn't be discounted so quickly.

My friend Paul Tucker would go MS definitely.
More like 50" and state of the art circa 1998. Compared to the 77W (or even TK's lie flat seat) they are seriously out of date. Your mate Mr Tucker clearly has different taste.
Swanhunter is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2009, 3:17 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: mostly London
Programs: BA Gold - so flying too much again... plus AA, LX, VS and too many hotel programmes to mention
Posts: 594
I would go with TK, no question. IST is far better than CAI as a stopover airport (pyramids notwithstanding). Just thinking about the mess you will face in CAI airport makes me shudder.
Compromising the trip just to try out BD isn't worth it IMHO.

Where did you find the TK fares by the way?
FlyingDentist is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.