![]() |
Reducing fuel surcharges - reward flights
BA have just reduced their fuel surcharge by 26 pounds for long-haul return flights (20 for medium haul).
As oil approached $75/bbl I suspect this is going to be an increasingly regular occurance. Has anyone had an experience in trying to reclaim some of the surcharge for a future reward booking (I booked last month for a flight in April). The only way may be to cancel and rebook or change the flight. Cancel will definately work but may result in you losing the flight (and incurring a 20 pounds charge - but the fuel surcharge may have fallen more than this) or a change would cost 25 pounds but could work out quite expensive if you have multiple legs and two single journey bookings (as I do). Any thoughts? Jon |
Originally Posted by monkeymagic
(Post 10522767)
BA have just reduced their fuel surcharge by 26 pounds for long-haul return flights (20 for medium haul).
|
This whole fuel surcharge saga will be much like the energy companies I suspect. Like greased lightning putting them up but very slow to bring them down if at all.
|
I heard that NH has actually just increased their surcharge :eek:
Generally they are coming down, just very slowly. Fuel is now at March levels and the surcharges were lower in March than they are now as a general rule. Anyone know what BDs surcharges are at the moment? Redeeming to LAS has been a killer recently. |
Part of the problem is that many of the airlines hedge their fuel and therefore are locked into certain prices, regardless of where the oil price moves. A good thing in a raising oil price environment... the opposite in falling..
|
Originally Posted by Tiger_lily
(Post 10522969)
This whole fuel surcharge saga will be much like the energy companies I suspect. Like greased lightning putting them up but very slow to bring them down if at all.
|
Originally Posted by Tiger_lily
(Post 10522969)
This whole fuel surcharge saga will be much like the energy companies I suspect. Like greased lightning putting them up but very slow to bring them down if at all.
|
Originally Posted by monkeymagic
(Post 10523091)
Part of the problem is that many of the airlines hedge their fuel and therefore are locked into certain prices, regardless of where the oil price moves. A good thing in a raising oil price environment... the opposite in falling..
|
Originally Posted by monkeymagic
(Post 10522767)
As oil approached $75/bbl I suspect this is going to be an increasingly regular occurance. Has anyone had an experience in trying to reclaim some of the surcharge for a future reward booking (I booked last month for a flight in April).
|
Originally Posted by lhr baby
(Post 10539438)
Once you've signed up to a hedging or contract deal its fixed, just like your fixed interest mortgage is fixed, for the duration of the term.
|
Originally Posted by lhr baby
(Post 10539438)
Whilst this may be off topic, I make no excuses for correcting a blatently incorrect statement. Energy companies are not like "grease lightening" putting prices up or necessarily that slow to bring them down. You clearly don't know how fuel price contracts work or how hedging is used to offset variations in prices and protect the customer against peaks. You have to make decisions from many months or even a year ahead to hedge against prices, or the costs would spike and tumble on a day to day basis and individual customers would face a price lottery. Once you've signed up to a hedging or contract deal its fixed, just like your fixed interest morgage is fixed, for the duration of the term. The price hikes only occur when the rolling average goes up or comes down. Sorry to be so blunt in my response but this is a common misunderstanding amongst the general public about how fuel is costed and charges passed on to customers. I'm not so knowledgeable about airlines but very knowledgeable about fuel prices and I have no doubt the airlines work in the same way as the energy companies.
It doesn't matter if I know how these types of deals work or not. It's public perception, actually, that this is happening. And more to the point why are BA and Virgin reducing them only in Economy? There's no justification for wringing the last penny out of J pax IMO |
Originally Posted by Tiger_lily
(Post 10541100)
And more to the point why are BA and Virgin reducing them only in Economy? There's no justification for wringing the last penny out of J pax IMO
On a serious note, Southwest in the USA has just made it's first loss due to fuel hedging :eek: this article gives a good explanation how it works: http://aviationblog.dallasnews.com/a...e-you-die.html |
Originally Posted by seattle29
(Post 10541369)
On a serious note, Southwest in the USA has just made it's first loss due to fuel hedging
|
Originally Posted by Tiger_lily
(Post 10541391)
:eek: I never thought I'd see the day that that happened. Is it true that UA hedged at ~$130?
One can only assume that they've hedged at well over $100 per barrel for months ahead! http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080917/airlines_fuel.html?.v=3 And yes, Southwest has also made a loss due to its fuel hedges :eek: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-f...,6167330.story Just goes to show how volatile this whole industry is... I think some of us take it for granted sometimes!! :cool: |
Originally Posted by seattle29
(Post 10541369)
I suppose that with a J seat... the passenger could in theory be checking in 2 bags, hence twice the weight and more fuel needed :D nah, but seriously, I don't agree with it either, but what can you do?
Anyway, thanks for the links, most informative. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:20 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.