Share trading halted [Asiana financial troubles]
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Amsterdam
Programs: A3, BA, OZ,
Posts: 1,098
Share trading halted [Asiana financial troubles]
According to Reuters,
Kind of curious if this means anything or if it is just some oversight.
The Korea Exchange has suspended trading in shares of Asiana Airlines Inc, after an auditor for South Korea’s second-biggest carrier said it lacked enough information to judge its value.
#3
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,423
"We can’t rule out the possibility of liquidity risks growing, as this undermines the credibility of its accounting information, and therefore its access to the capital market,” Moody’s Investor Service’s South Korean unit wrote in a note, saying it will consider lowering its rating of Asiana’s credit."
#4
Join Date: Mar 2019
Programs: VA WP, UA WP, QF LTNB.
Posts: 35
PWC are the auditors. Asian Fails to Get Accounting Sign-Off. Article quotes Moody's:
#5
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: SFO
Programs: OZ Diamond/*G, IHG Diamond Amb, Hilton Gold
Posts: 2,239
I imagine this has more to do with embezzling or misappropriation of funds from OZ to other Kumho Group ventures than an indication that Asiana suspending operations is imminent. Far more likely to suspend operations IMO is WOW Air.
#6
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,638
Considering OZ is generating a good US$650 million in cash a year from operating activities, I highly doubt they're anywhere near going under. That is, if they stop messing about in businesses they have no business being in and of course, assuming their financials are accurate.
Last edited by stupidhead; Mar 25, 2019 at 9:44 am
#7
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: NYC
Programs: OZ Diamond *A Gold / Delta Gold
Posts: 775
https://www.reuters.com/article/asia...-idUSL3N21D01H
Asiana Airlines Fettered by Excessive Aircraft Leasing Costs - ??????? - BusinessKorea
This is sad, I think OZ has done a wealth of good for people who don't want to fly KE for personal reasons.
With revised numbers hiking the debt to equity ratio, and rating agencies potentially downgrading to non-investment grades, it would create an impossible situation for OZ.
Why lease that many planes though?
Asiana Airlines Fettered by Excessive Aircraft Leasing Costs - ??????? - BusinessKorea
This is sad, I think OZ has done a wealth of good for people who don't want to fly KE for personal reasons.
With revised numbers hiking the debt to equity ratio, and rating agencies potentially downgrading to non-investment grades, it would create an impossible situation for OZ.
Why lease that many planes though?
#8
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: DXB / KUO
Programs: AY, SQ, EK
Posts: 858
https://www.reuters.com/article/asia...-idUSL3N21D01H
Asiana Airlines Fettered by Excessive Aircraft Leasing Costs - ??????? - BusinessKorea
This is sad, I think OZ has done a wealth of good for people who don't want to fly KE for personal reasons.
With revised numbers hiking the debt to equity ratio, and rating agencies potentially downgrading to non-investment grades, it would create an impossible situation for OZ.
Why lease that many planes though?
Asiana Airlines Fettered by Excessive Aircraft Leasing Costs - ??????? - BusinessKorea
This is sad, I think OZ has done a wealth of good for people who don't want to fly KE for personal reasons.
With revised numbers hiking the debt to equity ratio, and rating agencies potentially downgrading to non-investment grades, it would create an impossible situation for OZ.
Why lease that many planes though?
As such, leasing a high % of your a/c is not a problem (look at IndiGo, VietJet Air and so on). BTW, I assume we are talking about operating leases. Gives an airline a lot of flexibility, no need to arrange debt, possibly quicker access to growth capacity, reduces residual value risk etc. etc. Airlines can also make nice upfront profits from sale-and-leasebacks. Plus there is plenty of competition in the leasing market, so airlines can actually get some really attractive deals.
Very few airlines globally are investment grade. I'm not sure whether local ratings (e.g. KIS) are 100% comparable to S&P, Fitch, Moody's.
The Korean airline industry is very unique.
#9
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: NYC
Programs: OZ Diamond *A Gold / Delta Gold
Posts: 775
Some of those figures in that latter article simply do not make sense.
As such, leasing a high % of your a/c is not a problem (look at IndiGo, VietJet Air and so on). BTW, I assume we are talking about operating leases. Gives an airline a lot of flexibility, no need to arrange debt, possibly quicker access to growth capacity, reduces residual value risk etc. etc. Airlines can also make nice upfront profits from sale-and-leasebacks. Plus there is plenty of competition in the leasing market, so airlines can actually get some really attractive deals.
Very few airlines globally are investment grade. I'm not sure whether local ratings (e.g. KIS) are 100% comparable to S&P, Fitch, Moody's.
The Korean airline industry is very unique.
As such, leasing a high % of your a/c is not a problem (look at IndiGo, VietJet Air and so on). BTW, I assume we are talking about operating leases. Gives an airline a lot of flexibility, no need to arrange debt, possibly quicker access to growth capacity, reduces residual value risk etc. etc. Airlines can also make nice upfront profits from sale-and-leasebacks. Plus there is plenty of competition in the leasing market, so airlines can actually get some really attractive deals.
Very few airlines globally are investment grade. I'm not sure whether local ratings (e.g. KIS) are 100% comparable to S&P, Fitch, Moody's.
The Korean airline industry is very unique.
#10
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: DXB / KUO
Programs: AY, SQ, EK
Posts: 858
The point being local ratings are not necessarily comparable to the ratings of big 3.
I recall KE and OZ had local ratings (KIS, KR, NICE) of A- / BBB+ (in that ballpark) a few years ago. By conventional credit metrics, can't imagine the big 3 would have rated them anywhere close.
I recall KE and OZ had local ratings (KIS, KR, NICE) of A- / BBB+ (in that ballpark) a few years ago. By conventional credit metrics, can't imagine the big 3 would have rated them anywhere close.
#12
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: NYC
Programs: OZ Diamond *A Gold / Delta Gold
Posts: 775
The point being local ratings are not necessarily comparable to the ratings of big 3.
I recall KE and OZ had local ratings (KIS, KR, NICE) of A- / BBB+ (in that ballpark) a few years ago. By conventional credit metrics, can't imagine the big 3 would have rated them anywhere close.
I recall KE and OZ had local ratings (KIS, KR, NICE) of A- / BBB+ (in that ballpark) a few years ago. By conventional credit metrics, can't imagine the big 3 would have rated them anywhere close.
#13
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: NYC
Programs: OZ Diamond *A Gold / Delta Gold
Posts: 775
If Asiana goes down, the mother group Kumho will probably go down as well, hence the decision of the CEO.
#14
Join Date: Jan 2017
Programs: ALL Gold, MPC Silver
Posts: 175
Asiana definitely falls under the definition of TBTF in Korea, I expect that the Industrial Bank of Korea will step in if .... does indeed hit the fan. If Asiana fails, then the entire Gumho group fails and that would be political suicide for the current government.
#15
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: DXB / KUO
Programs: AY, SQ, EK
Posts: 858
I do not believe the rating scale to be the same (could be wrong, but remember looking into this some years ago). BTW, tried to find the rating on Moody's and could not. How do they list it?