Motion Sickness: Acela vs Regional
I frequently take the Keystone and NE Regional PHL-NYP and find that I can only work ~20 minutes until I get motion sickness. I'm fine if I stop using my laptop.
I'm considering taking the Acela BOS-PHL for an upcoming trip, and am wondering if motion sickness tends to better or worse on the Acela. I'm hoping I can work for at least half of the journey. I have an upgrade to F if that makes any difference. Otherwise I'll probably have to fly. Does anyone get motion sickness who has taken both the Acela and NER? Which was better? |
Have you tried sitting in an aisle seat near the center of the car facing forward?
Bob H |
The Acela is definitely less “bumpy” than the NER and Keystone. I would expect that helps with motion sickness. Would also suggest a forward facing seat.
|
Interesting. I find the Acela bumpier actually. I think it's because of the increased speed. Particularly around PHL-Wilmington-Baltimore.
|
Originally Posted by BobH
(Post 32009361)
Have you tried sitting in an aisle seat near the center of the car facing forward?
Bob H |
Originally Posted by doctor15
(Post 32010152)
I always sit facing forward but usually window. I haven't thought about where in the car I am. Will try that next time, thanks!
Bob H |
In general, I do not have any trouble with motion sickness - however my stomach gets so upset on the Acela, I had to stop taking it - after leaving DC, if I'm using my laptop I have an upset stomach by the time we get to Baltimore. For my trips to NY I switched back to flying as I couldn't have all of the non-productive time on the Acela. For shorter trips I typically take the Regional now and do not have the motion sickness issue. I have talked to other business travelers who have told me they have the same motion sickness on the Acela.
|
No motion sickness here, but I do have to agree that the Acela has gotten bumpier over the past decade -- think they are pushing the trains to higher speeds, but the tracks haven't been upgraded. I used to be able to do a lot of work on the laptop, and that is now less feasible with the bumpier ride.
|
Originally Posted by AndyPatterson
(Post 32033457)
No motion sickness here, but I do have to agree that the Acela has gotten bumpier over the past decade -- think they are pushing the trains to higher speeds, but the tracks haven't been upgraded. I used to be able to do a lot of work on the laptop, and that is now less feasible with the bumpier ride.
EXCEPT on those unfortunate times (has happened more than once on a Sunday afternoon), we get stuck behind a MARC train going 30 MPH. I don't quite understand how this happens, and it's certainly not scheduled this way. |
I get terribly motion sick when trying to work while riding in an automobile, but no issue with the laptop on Acela F 2x / week. F solo seat facing forward definitely will feel the most natural; you can also close the window curtain to eliminate some peripheral motion blur. I generally ride south of PHL since I'm DC based, and there are some bumpy parts, but the northern stretch that you will be on should be smoother.
|
I’ve been thinking about this thread the last few times I’ve been on the train. I’ve come to the conclusion that while the NE regional is bumpier, it is more of a jerky bump, while the Acela has more of a rolling motion. I could see how the latter would be worse for motion sickness.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:05 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.