Last edit by: mia
Earlier discussion is in this thread: Financial Review Discussion [2009-2013]
In the USA a Financial Review typically includes a request to submit an IRS form 4506-T which authorizes American Express to obtain a transcript of your Federal Income Tax Return for a specific year. It does not authorize a copy of the actual return. Download the form here: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f4506t.pdf
Order your own transcript here: https://sa2.www4.irs.gov/irfof-tra/start.do
Other USA-based rewards card issuers also audit accounts and end unsatisfactory relationships.
Bank of America: 2013
Citibank: 2013
JP Morgan Chase: 2013.1 2013.4 2013.9 2013.12
In the USA a Financial Review typically includes a request to submit an IRS form 4506-T which authorizes American Express to obtain a transcript of your Federal Income Tax Return for a specific year. It does not authorize a copy of the actual return. Download the form here: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f4506t.pdf
Order your own transcript here: https://sa2.www4.irs.gov/irfof-tra/start.do
Other USA-based rewards card issuers also audit accounts and end unsatisfactory relationships.
Bank of America: 2013
Citibank: 2013
JP Morgan Chase: 2013.1 2013.4 2013.9 2013.12
Financial Review discussion
#871
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Miami, Mpls & London
Programs: AA & Marriott Perpetual Platinum; DL & HH Gold
Posts: 48,954
#872
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 194
That's my entire point. They said it won't count. They claim that the bank account that was used for the payments needs to have Person A's name on it. They don't care what Person A's bank statements look like if that bank account wasn't the one used to pay the card.
It is utterly stupid logic.
It is utterly stupid logic.
#875
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 194
But I think some smaller transactions could be made, just for the sake of showing that there is some payment history established between Person A's account and the cards themselves lol.
#876
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 539
There are more than 5 cards. The transaction volume would just be a lot in my opinion.
But I think some smaller transactions could be made, just for the sake of showing that there is some payment history established between Person A's account and the cards themselves lol.
But I think some smaller transactions could be made, just for the sake of showing that there is some payment history established between Person A's account and the cards themselves lol.
#877
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pacific Northwest
Programs: UA Gold 1MM, AS 75k, AA Plat, Bonvoyed Gold, Honors Dia, Hyatt Explorer, IHG Plat, ...
Posts: 16,845
Another alternative is to have A & B open a joint account at the same bank where person B has the account that was being used for payments. Person B can then just easily transfer to joint account before payments need to be made. Joint account would just be used for this purpose.
B could potentially add A as a co-owner to the "bank account where all the payments have gone out of so far" if B trusts A. And it might also have other unexpected side effects.
#878
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Miami, Mpls & London
Programs: AA & Marriott Perpetual Platinum; DL & HH Gold
Posts: 48,954
It's improbable that anything can be done now to change what was done before, but why would we think that a front line telephone agent's statement is the final decision? I wouldn't overthink this. Send them what they ask for, plus anything else you think is relevant.
#879
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: NYC
Programs: OZ Diamond *A Gold / Delta Gold
Posts: 775
There are more than 5 cards. The transaction volume would just be a lot in my opinion.
But I think some smaller transactions could be made, just for the sake of showing that there is some payment history established between Person A's account and the cards themselves lol.
But I think some smaller transactions could be made, just for the sake of showing that there is some payment history established between Person A's account and the cards themselves lol.
If Person B was paying for everyone without receiving any money from them: instead of paying AMEX directly, Person B can transfer the same amount to person A and it's debited from Person A account.
#880
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 539
Well, how does that help with "But for the bank account, the rep on the line says they also need to see that the primary account holders' name is on the bank account where all the payments have gone out of so far. "
B could potentially add A as a co-owner to the "bank account where all the payments have gone out of so far" if B trusts A. And it might also have other unexpected side effects.
B could potentially add A as a co-owner to the "bank account where all the payments have gone out of so far" if B trusts A. And it might also have other unexpected side effects.
#881
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 194
However, it's not a front line telephone agent. It's the actual account manager who is overseeing the FR. That individual will be looking at the submitted documents and making the final decision on the account. This isn't some random customer service rep. To the point where when the FR lined is called, and the specific rep's extension # isn't put in, it will forward you to one of many FR agents, but none of them can see the details of the FR case except the assigned account manager who is in charge of the FR.
Last edited by idkmybffjill; Jun 7, 2020 at 11:48 pm
#882
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 194
I was thinking 4 payments, monthly, based on the amount of the spend on each cards. It wouldn't be that much. And then use Person's A account to pay everything.
If Person B was paying for everyone without receiving any money from them: instead of paying AMEX directly, Person B can transfer the same amount to person A and it's debited from Person A account.
If Person B was paying for everyone without receiving any money from them: instead of paying AMEX directly, Person B can transfer the same amount to person A and it's debited from Person A account.
#883
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Programs: UA 1K, AA Lifetime Platinum, DL Platinum, Honors Diamond, Bonvoy Titanium, Hertz Platinum
Posts: 7,969
How far off are you from filing for 2019? Perhaps another acceptable solution is to file for 2019 soon and then allow Amex to look at the transcript of that. I'm making the assumption that the request for paystubs and bank statements is entirely due to not having filed for 2019, and that there aren't additional requirements for whatever reason.
Also, how did this FR come about? Did you receive written notice of some kind? You said that you spoke to a rep about the FR. It's not clear to me if that rep was specific to the FR department or just a general cardholder rep. If the latter, than anything they say about a nuanced FR issue is likely to be less authoritative. I'm reasonably certain that Amex didn't call out of the blue and request an FR over the phone - either they sent a written notice, or the cardholder became aware of the situation in any of several ways and then called in.
The reason I think this is important is if there's anything in writing from Amex about the FR, then the thing to do is just comply with the request as it's written. I can see a situation where Amex requests paystubs and bank account statements in the cardholder's name, then the cardholder decides to call Amex and bring up the issue of payments historically coming from someone else's accounts, and what should they do about that? Doing something like that can cause a situation like this to go downhill quickly. Not only does it increase the chances of a miscommunication and/or a made-up answer, it can also raise red flags that get noted onto the account and make the whole process more difficult. It's not clear to me that Amex even knew that the payments were coming from someone else. I suppose it's possible, but it seems unlikely to me that Amex would be noting in any machine-readable form what the name on checks being sent in for payments is, and it also seems unlikely (but possible) that they're reviewing images of payments in order to trigger an FR, or even during initial stages of an FR. I could be wrong about this.
Also, how did this FR come about? Did you receive written notice of some kind? You said that you spoke to a rep about the FR. It's not clear to me if that rep was specific to the FR department or just a general cardholder rep. If the latter, than anything they say about a nuanced FR issue is likely to be less authoritative. I'm reasonably certain that Amex didn't call out of the blue and request an FR over the phone - either they sent a written notice, or the cardholder became aware of the situation in any of several ways and then called in.
The reason I think this is important is if there's anything in writing from Amex about the FR, then the thing to do is just comply with the request as it's written. I can see a situation where Amex requests paystubs and bank account statements in the cardholder's name, then the cardholder decides to call Amex and bring up the issue of payments historically coming from someone else's accounts, and what should they do about that? Doing something like that can cause a situation like this to go downhill quickly. Not only does it increase the chances of a miscommunication and/or a made-up answer, it can also raise red flags that get noted onto the account and make the whole process more difficult. It's not clear to me that Amex even knew that the payments were coming from someone else. I suppose it's possible, but it seems unlikely to me that Amex would be noting in any machine-readable form what the name on checks being sent in for payments is, and it also seems unlikely (but possible) that they're reviewing images of payments in order to trigger an FR, or even during initial stages of an FR. I could be wrong about this.
Last edited by Steve M; Jun 8, 2020 at 1:13 pm
#884
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Miami, Mpls & London
Programs: AA & Marriott Perpetual Platinum; DL & HH Gold
Posts: 48,954
How long must I wait before a transcript is available for my current year tax return?
If you filed your tax return electronically, IRS's return processing takes from 2 to 4 weeks before a transcript becomes available. If you mailed your tax return, it takes about 6 weeks. If you didn’t pay all the tax you owe, your transcript may not be available until mid-May or a week after you pay the full amount owed. Refer to transcript availability for more information.
If you filed your tax return electronically, IRS's return processing takes from 2 to 4 weeks before a transcript becomes available. If you mailed your tax return, it takes about 6 weeks. If you didn’t pay all the tax you owe, your transcript may not be available until mid-May or a week after you pay the full amount owed. Refer to transcript availability for more information.
#885
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 194
How far off are you from filing for 2019? Perhaps another acceptable solution is to file for 2019 soon and then allow Amex to look at the transcript of that. I'm making the assumption that the request for paystubs and bank statements is entirely due to not having filed for 2019, and that there aren't additional requirements for whatever reason.
Also, how did this FR come about? Did you receive written notice of some kind? You said that you spoke to a rep about the FR. It's not clear to me if that rep was specific to the FR department or just a general cardholder rep. If the latter, than anything they say about a nuanced FR issue is likely to be less authoritative. I'm reasonably certain that Amex didn't call out of the blue and request an FR over the phone - either they sent a written notice, or the cardholder became aware of the situation in any of several ways and then called in.
The reason I think this is important is if there's anything in writing from Amex about the FR, then the thing to do is just comply with the request as it's written. I can see a situation where Amex requests paystubs and bank account statements in the cardholder's name, then the cardholder decides to call Amex and bring up the issue of payments historically coming from someone else's accounts, and what should they do about that? Doing something like that can cause a situation like this to go downhill quickly. Not only does it increase the chances of a miscommunication and/or a made-up answer, it can also raise red flags that get noted onto the account and make the whole process more difficult. It's not clear to me that Amex even knew that the payments were coming from someone else. I suppose it's possible, but it seems unlikely to me that Amex would be noting in any machine-readable form what the name on checks being sent in for payments is, and it also seems unlikely (but possible) that they're reviewing images of payments in order to trigger an FR, or even during initial stages of an FR. I could be wrong about this.
Also, how did this FR come about? Did you receive written notice of some kind? You said that you spoke to a rep about the FR. It's not clear to me if that rep was specific to the FR department or just a general cardholder rep. If the latter, than anything they say about a nuanced FR issue is likely to be less authoritative. I'm reasonably certain that Amex didn't call out of the blue and request an FR over the phone - either they sent a written notice, or the cardholder became aware of the situation in any of several ways and then called in.
The reason I think this is important is if there's anything in writing from Amex about the FR, then the thing to do is just comply with the request as it's written. I can see a situation where Amex requests paystubs and bank account statements in the cardholder's name, then the cardholder decides to call Amex and bring up the issue of payments historically coming from someone else's accounts, and what should they do about that? Doing something like that can cause a situation like this to go downhill quickly. Not only does it increase the chances of a miscommunication and/or a made-up answer, it can also raise red flags that get noted onto the account and make the whole process more difficult. It's not clear to me that Amex even knew that the payments were coming from someone else. I suppose it's possible, but it seems unlikely to me that Amex would be noting in any machine-readable form what the name on checks being sent in for payments is, and it also seems unlikely (but possible) that they're reviewing images of payments in order to trigger an FR, or even during initial stages of an FR. I could be wrong about this.
It was from the official FR department. I don't know how many times I need to restate that lol. The FR came about as a call from the FR department, followed by all of the cards under that primary account holder being frozen, and then an email from the FR department with the link to submit the requested documents.
Do you need more proof than this that it's from the FR department? Lol guys, you are seriously killing me.
An FR was already done last year and passed using IRS tax transcripts, so it's not like the first walk in the park with the FR department.
This year (as I clearly explained in my OP and apparently more people did not read...), they are no longer doing tax transcripts because the IRS is delaying them, so AmEx is instead asking for bank statements and paystubs. They also asked why most of the transactions were being made by one of the authorized users and stated that the bank account being used for payments must have the primary cardholders name on it. Multiple calls were made arguing this point, but they said it's the rule, no exceptions.
Just to reiterate one last time, the request for bank statements and paystubs is because the IRS is delaying transcripts right now due to everything going on. AmEx has no idea whether our 2019 taxes were filed (but they were), and the offer was even made to submit the 2019 tax transcripts. The FR account manager said they preferred that, as it was easier for them (just verify income, reinstate account), but due to IRS delays, they were not doing the 4506-T form right now.
This is as clear as I can state these things, so hopefully no one repeats or asks me again if this is "from the real FR department" or "submit your 2019 taxes" - 2019 taxes are already done, but AmEx is NOT accepting it for the moment.
Sorry, just a little frustrated that the point being brought up over and over is whether it's a random customer service rep or the real FR department. Don't know why it's so hard to just accept that it is ha. Random customer service people do not call from the FR department or freeze all of the cards with a notice on the online account to call the FR department's # if that has not been done already.
Last edited by idkmybffjill; Jun 9, 2020 at 7:41 pm