Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > American Airlines | AAdvantage
Reload this Page >

AA Flight from Miami to London turned back after mask incident

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

AA Flight from Miami to London turned back after mask incident

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 27, 2022, 8:06 pm
  #61  
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: TX
Programs: Alaska, AA, Marriott
Posts: 943
Originally Posted by jcmalcolm
That would likely be illegal under US law, and it should be.
What law, specifically, would that violate?
thatmikereed is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2022, 8:12 pm
  #62  
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: CMI
Programs: AAdvantage Platinum
Posts: 106
Originally Posted by jcmalcolm
That would likely be illegal under US law, and it should be.
No, it's not illegal to make such a factual statement nor should it be. That's so "out there" that I have to wonder where you even got the idea from.
uiucengineer is offline  
Old Jan 28, 2022, 7:50 am
  #63  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: CPT
Posts: 70
Originally Posted by vasantn
Wrong. Any airline can put anyone on its own internal "no-fly list". In fact, it's done all the time.
Of course, any business can refuse to serve anyone. However, if that business conspires with other businesses to get them also to refuse to serve, that's another matter. If anyone seriously thinks there is a list shared between airlines that would prevent someone who is no physical threat from flying anywhere, (as was hinted above) please provide evidence of it existing. There are many lawyers who will happily address that. It's simply not the airline's role.
The term 'No-Fly List' has a very established meaning in US law and perhaps shouldn't be tossed around lightly.
vasantn and LETTERBOY like this.
jcmalcolm is offline  
Old Jan 28, 2022, 9:28 am
  #64  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: CLT
Programs: US CP, SPG Gold
Posts: 592
Obviously the way around a shared no-fly list is a behavior reporting system a la a credit report. The system contains information reported by the airlines but does not provide a recommendation and each airline chooses whether or not to do business with that customer based on the content of that report.
Whether this is a widespread-enough problem or not is up for debate and I suspect it has not risen to the level that would get the airlines to unclench their fiscal you-know-whats enough to build such a system. But there is a precedent.
jghassell is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2022, 1:11 pm
  #65  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Orange County, CA, USA
Programs: AA (Life Plat), Marriott (Life Titanium) and every other US program
Posts: 6,411
Originally Posted by jcmalcolm
Of course, any business can refuse to serve anyone. However, if that business conspires with other businesses to get them also to refuse to serve, that's another matter. If anyone seriously thinks there is a list shared between airlines that would prevent someone who is no physical threat from flying anywhere, (as was hinted above) please provide evidence of it existing. There are many lawyers who will happily address that. It's simply not the airline's role.
The term 'No-Fly List' has a very established meaning in US law and perhaps shouldn't be tossed around lightly.
Actually, to be technical, as a common carrier they have very few rights to refuse service. But they can enforce safety and security and reasonable policies.
js1993 likes this.
sbrower is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.