![]() |
Originally Posted by futuramadramallama
(Post 33646217)
I recall reading in some interview of an AA exec, that they have "trouble making money" on the west coast to South America route(s). Can't think of the source off the top of my head.
These just aren't good routes for airlines: weak local demand, even weaker premium demand, high ownership cost allocations... That's an ugly trifecta. |
Originally Posted by DWFI
(Post 33647730)
Except for that UA is launching more "niche" international routes than ever before.
It's an AA problem, not a global travel patterns problem. -FlyerBeek |
Originally Posted by Kacee
(Post 33648063)
It's interesting how folks around here hold UA up as some kind of shining example. Yes, it is doing better than AA operationally. But you definitely do not want UA, which has become Spirit-lite in terms of soft-product, and has devalued the MP program below even DL, to be the carrier that AA emulates.
-FlyerBeek |
Thanks for the info, opinions, and replies!
Long time United flyer here, but we did take the non stop in Business/First section with the lie flats and just loved it. Meantime, we DO take the Polaris from IAH to EZE and love that route too it just adds many hours to the itinerary |
Originally Posted by Herb687
(Post 33648384)
Every airline that has flown from the US West Coast to Deep South America has had trouble making money
|
Originally Posted by carlosdca
(Post 33652716)
Latam has been flying non stop lax-lim and lax-scl for at least 10 years and have had lie flats ever since. I guess they have been doing ok with those routes?
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:33 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.