AA needs a rule requiring head phones...

Old Dec 27, 2020, 12:02 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: MSP/BUF/BNA/LFT
Programs: AA Plat, Priority Club Gold, Choice Privileges Gold
Posts: 1,223
AA needs a rule requiring head phones...

I'm growing tired of having to be the person to ask other passengers to have some courtesy when using their electronics. Pre-COVID this would happen occasionally but this year, since there is a different passenger mix, I have had to do this on almost every flight.

I think the FA's should be policing this. One day, a cranky passenger that is trying to sleep is going to snap and do something extreme because some other passengers are rude and have no respect for others.
dls25 is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2020, 12:07 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: DCA
Programs: AA EXP, DL FO, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 6,709
Originally Posted by dls25
I'm growing tired of having to be the person to ask other passengers to have some courtesy when using their electronics. Pre-COVID this would happen occasionally but this year, since there is a different passenger mix, I have had to do this on almost every flight.

I think the FA's should be policing this. One day, a cranky passenger that is trying to sleep is going to snap and do something extreme because some other passengers are rude and have no respect for others.
I think it's already against the rules to play audio without headphones on board. Or maybe that's a Delta rule I'm thinking of.
KDCAflyer is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2020, 12:18 pm
  #3  
Used to be 'Travelergcp'
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New Orleans
Programs: AA Plat, Marriott Gold, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 2,823
This is a lapse in courtesy that seems to happen everywhere nowadays.
Spiff, davork, writerguyfl and 1 others like this.
TravelerMSY is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2020, 12:43 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Live: PWM/KBXM/BGR; Work: DCA/DFW/Everywhere; Play: LAS/MUC/MLE
Programs: AA EXP, DL PM, Hyatt Glob, Marriott Ambassador/LTP, Nat'l Exec Elite, mlife Noir, LEYE Gold
Posts: 6,631
Originally Posted by dls25
I think the FA's should be policing this.
Though I share your distaste for this particular habit (which, quite frankly, occurs across regardless of "passenger mix"), the FAs have enough to police. Give them too many things to dragon and they'll stop policing anything at all. They've already grown weary of mask policing, and I can't remember the last time I was actually woken up to bring my seat upright on a domestic widebody redeye.

Plus, at the end of the day, you can't police people into being kind.
platbrownguy is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2020, 12:48 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: LAX oriented World Digital Nomad
Programs: AA Exec Plat, Hyatt Globalist, MLife/Cosmo Identity Gold, Other Vegas too...
Posts: 1,317
Originally Posted by platbrownguy
Though I share your distaste for this particular habit (which, quite frankly, occurs across regardless of "passenger mix"), the FAs have enough to police. Give them too many things to dragon and they'll stop policing anything at all. They've already grown weary of mask policing, and I can't remember the last time I was actually woken up to bring my seat upright on a domestic widebody redeye.

Plus, at the end of the day, you can't police people into being kind.
Eh then allow the passengers to do it. I was always that guy at the movie theatre staring cold (backwards) at somebody when they got TOO out of line.

Lucky you on not getting woke, just last week I was wakened in MCE to bring my chair out of a recline when it truly was already, 100 percent, and she was so adamant. It wasn't even broken or 90 percent, it was up damnit, lol.
Carolina2Cali is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2020, 2:23 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: FSD
Programs: AA CK, DL SM, UA PS, HH Diamond, Bonvoy Titanium , Hyatt Globalist, Global Entry, CLEAR
Posts: 457
It's already against the rules.

I was just on a flight to Barbados last Saturday with a family of 6 occupying 4 seats in F (2 lap children) across the isle. One of the kids was having a temper tantrum (for about the 50th time) and dad put a video player in the seat back and put the volume at about 11 (sorry for the Spinal Tap reference) so the kid would behave.

Took all of about 30 seconds for the FA to come back and let them know about the ear bud policy. They were NOT happy about it.
asnovici and bchandler02 like this.
jhalapin is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2020, 2:29 pm
  #7  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: MSP/BUF/BNA/LFT
Programs: AA Plat, Priority Club Gold, Choice Privileges Gold
Posts: 1,223
Originally Posted by jhalapin
It's already against the rules.

I was just on a flight to Barbados last Saturday with a family of 6 occupying 4 seats in F (2 lap children) across the isle. One of the kids was having a temper tantrum (for about the 50th time) and dad put a video player in the seat back and put the volume at about 11 (sorry for the Spinal Tap reference) so the kid would behave.

Took all of about 30 seconds for the FA to come back and let them know about the ear bud policy. They were NOT happy about it.
Interesting. The last FA I engaged on the issue basically said there is no rule so talking to passengers about it is not her job.
dls25 is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2020, 2:40 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: KHOU/KIAH
Programs: AA EXP | Marriott Bonvoy Titanium| Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 11,121
Originally Posted by dls25
Interesting. The last FA I engaged on the issue basically said there is no rule so talking to passengers about it is not her job.
Some FAs are only "here for our safety".
Antarius is online now  
Old Dec 27, 2020, 2:47 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: PHL
Programs: AA Executive Platinum; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 2,660
I was in 1D a month ago and they rolled the economy cabin forward and the guy that got 1F was playing rap music loudly without earphones for awhile during taxi. Not good. But at least it stopped in flight.
apeortdz is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2020, 2:53 pm
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,811
Originally Posted by dls25
I think the FA's should be policing this.
They should not. Rule or no rule - selfish people will still do that. There is no point.

A good example is the mask requirement, which some people still ignore and get themselves kicked and banned.
garykung is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2020, 2:59 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,154
Originally Posted by platbrownguy
I can't remember the last time I was actually woken up to bring my seat upright on a domestic widebody redeye.
Why the hyperspecific reference? Are you talking about F being allowed to lie flat for landing? Are you woken up on domestic narrowbodies and international widebodies?

Also, how are you tabulating this? Sounds like you're recalling cases where you woke up reclined, close to landing, and inferred that you were already below 10,000 feet (presumably by the short remaining descent, lack of an announcement/chime, and/or FAs already being buckled in). How many of those cases have actually occurred in your domestic widebody redeye flights -- i.e., what's your sample size?
FlyingEgghead is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2020, 3:04 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,154
Originally Posted by dls25
I think the FA's should be policing this.
Originally Posted by garykung
They should not. Rule or no rule - selfish people will still do that. There is no point.

A good example is the mask requirement, which some people still ignore and get themselves kicked and banned.
Kicking people off and banning them is "policing". Are you saying don't enforce masks at all?
FlyingEgghead is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2020, 3:20 pm
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,811
Originally Posted by FlyingEgghead
Kicking people off and banning them is "policing". Are you saying don't enforce masks at all?
That's my point - even you have FAs policing, people still do stupid things. Do you really believe that starting policing the "headphone" will resolve the problem?
garykung is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2020, 3:41 pm
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: MCO
Programs: AA, B6, DL, EK, EY, QR, SQ, UA, Amex Plat, Marriott Tit, HHonors Gold
Posts: 12,809
Agree with the OP if they don't have a rule about this, then they should. I'm relatively certain they do have a policy requiring headphones for audio onboard the aircraft though.
skylady likes this.
cmd320 is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2020, 4:08 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,154
Originally Posted by garykung
That's my point - even you have FAs policing, people still do stupid things. Do you really believe that starting policing the "headphone" will resolve the problem?
1. I do think that most people obey personally directed FA orders most of the time, so it at least cuts down the problem.
2. Regarding masks, you say "people still do stupid things" but isn't it a lot fewer than if FAs didn't police? Mask compliance rates are very high. It sounds like maybe you're using "FA policing" to refer to asking/cajoling that isn't backed up by real consequences. But refusal to wear a mask does result in real consequences to the pax as you noted, hence my confusion. Indeed, in principle, disobeying any valid FA order (for rules filed by the airline with the FAA) can result in actual police/legal consequences, and even short of that, FAs and pilots have wide discretion to remove uncooperative pax from the current flight. And the knowledge that this can happen incentivizes many more pax to comply with rules.
FlyingEgghead is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.