ARCHIVE: Airport Upgrade and Standby Priority List (“PALL”) Order (master thread)
#91
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SJC
Programs: AA EXP, BA Silver, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton diamond, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 33,527
Cheers.
#92
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 885
Without knowing the full details, I would speculate that the problem isn't AC agents adding people to the standby list, rather, its AC agents adding people to the standby list while the agent is boarding/processing standby/closing the flight. At that point, many gate agents like to have complete control of the list. Its unclear how close to departure the OP really was ("near boarding time"), of course...
#93
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,176
Without knowing the full details, I would speculate that the problem isn't AC agents adding people to the standby list, rather, its AC agents adding people to the standby list while the agent is boarding/processing standby/closing the flight. At that point, many gate agents like to have complete control of the list. Its unclear how close to departure the OP really was ("near boarding time"), of course...
The key is what time they are added to the list, if the agent has already processed the standby list , other agents adding people to it can cause no end of problems.
#94
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Madison WI
Programs: AA Lifetime PLT - 2.9MM, Lifetime AC, HHonors Gold, Marriott Gold, IHG Plat Amb, Hertz Precs Crcl
Posts: 2,212
EDIT: Just read jrhone's post - too bad the system can't 'lock' the list at the GA request - BUT - also that the system would ensure that the GA can't lock it too early!!!! :-)
#95
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: jfk area
Programs: AA platinum; 2MM AA, Delta Diamond, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 10,291
i've been in ac clubs where the agents have called the gate* to speak with a ga first, this way there is no competition between ga and ac angels.
[*the ac knows the phone numbers for the various gates--, from one of my previous posts here on ft.]
[*the ac knows the phone numbers for the various gates--, from one of my previous posts here on ft.]
#96
Moderator: New York City and FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2007
Programs: AA PLT, Natl EC
Posts: 10,855
They can certainly close a flight (and jrhone will correct me if I'm wrong). The problems arise when overzealous AC agents manage to reopen them to add more pax. I've been added to a flight in just this way, only to be removed by the GA because the flight was actually weight restricted. As nrr states, this can be avoided by better communication between the AC and GA, but perhaps some AC agents are hesitant to bother gate agents knowing how busy they are already?
#97
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC, USA
Programs: AA EXP 3MM, Lifetime Platinum, Marriott Titanium, HH Gold
Posts: 10,967
They can certainly close a flight (and jrhone will correct me if I'm wrong). The problems arise when overzealous AC agents manage to reopen them to add more pax. I've been added to a flight in just this way, only to be removed by the GA because the flight was actually weight restricted. As nrr states, this can be avoided by better communication between the AC and GA, but perhaps some AC agents are hesitant to bother gate agents knowing how busy they are already?
I had a similar thing happen. I was standing by on an earlier flight and the AAngel went ahead and cleared me. When I got to the gate, the GA called me up and took away my boarding pass, saying "the Admirals Club agent cleared you before I was ready to give you the seat."
In the end, we have to keep in mind that the GA(s) have ultimate resposibility for getting the door closed and the jetbridge retracted on time. I thing jrhone is right, that at a certain point before departure, only the GAs working the flight should be able to manipulate flight data in SABRE.
#98
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: AA Plat/1MM
Posts: 546
Okay, you got me--what is IRROPS? (I apologize in advance if there is a Flyer Talk dictionary or something I should have consulted before posting this.)
#99
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2004
Location: DFW/DAL
Programs: AA Lifetime PLT, AS MVPG, HH Diamond, NCL Platinum Plus, MSC Diamond
Posts: 21,422
#100
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne
Programs: ►QFWP/LTG►VA WP►HyattExpl.►HiltonGold►ALL Silver
Posts: 21,991
#101
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Programs: Bonvoy LTT, Hyatt Exp, AA 1MM, UA Silver, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 970
This was VERY close to the end of boarding, but the GA was still working the standby list, as evidenced by her clearing walk-ups.
#102
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,176
They can certainly close a flight (and jrhone will correct me if I'm wrong). The problems arise when overzealous AC agents manage to reopen them to add more pax. I've been added to a flight in just this way, only to be removed by the GA because the flight was actually weight restricted. As nrr states, this can be avoided by better communication between the AC and GA, but perhaps some AC agents are hesitant to bother gate agents knowing how busy they are already?
edit ; I dont think it is a turf war, just that at times the communication isnt as good as it should be. GA's have to understand that the AC staff are trying to help our premium passengers by providing them with extra service, while the AC staff need to understand that if they place someone on a list once a flight is in final, it should be stated to the passenger that due to time limits they might not be accomodated in the correct order, this is especially true if the GA has already processed the standby list. If the AC staff place an EP on the standby list at 15 minutes before departure, and the GA has already accomodated all the PL and AG passengers, are we supposed to pull a PL/AG member off the plane to accomodate the EP , in the correct order ?
Last edited by jrhone; Aug 5, 2008 at 7:56 am
#103
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: MSY (finally); previously NYC, BOS, AUH
Programs: AA EXP, 6MM; BA GLD
Posts: 17,236
GA's usuing a control set at the gate can change the status of a flight at different times . The usual changes are putting the flight in to 'final' , which restricts checkin in and seat changes only to the GA computers at the gate, 'final all' which releases all seat blocks , and then 'close' and 'pdc'. Agents can also put the flight in 'held' status which stops anyone else from assigning seats or playing around with things while they work the standby list.
edit ; I dont think it is a turf war, just that at times the communication isnt as good as it should be. GA's have to understand that the AC staff are trying to help our premium passengers by providing them with extra service, while the AC staff need to understand that if they place someone on a list once a flight is in final, it should be stated to the passenger that due to time limits they might not be accomodated in the correct order, this is especially true if the GA has already processed the standby list. If the AC staff place an EP on the standby list at 15 minutes before departure, and the GA has already accomodated all the PL and AG passengers, are we supposed to pull a PL/AG member off the plane to accomodate the EP , in the correct order ?
edit ; I dont think it is a turf war, just that at times the communication isnt as good as it should be. GA's have to understand that the AC staff are trying to help our premium passengers by providing them with extra service, while the AC staff need to understand that if they place someone on a list once a flight is in final, it should be stated to the passenger that due to time limits they might not be accomodated in the correct order, this is especially true if the GA has already processed the standby list. If the AC staff place an EP on the standby list at 15 minutes before departure, and the GA has already accomodated all the PL and AG passengers, are we supposed to pull a PL/AG member off the plane to accomodate the EP , in the correct order ?
We should have an "ask jrhone" subforum on the AA board, where instead of the usual speculation and conjecture, we get real answers.
#104
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC, USA
Programs: AA EXP 3MM, Lifetime Platinum, Marriott Titanium, HH Gold
Posts: 10,967
#105
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SJC
Programs: AA EXP, BA Silver, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton diamond, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 33,527
Cheers.