![]() |
2019 Year in Review (AA eMail summary)
Received the Year in Review email just now
Hours in the Sky: 359 Times flows around the world: 7.5 Most common aircraft: a321 Rank among EXP flyers: 1% Most visited destinations: SFO, CLT Interesting. Sitting at 145 segments and 235k EQM for the year. |
here is what my email said
Hours in the sky... 178 Times around the world 6.5 Most common aircraft.. 777 Rank among EXP 3% But of course I could add my trip over Christmas to this list.. but why I wonder if this email from AA to suppose to make us feel important. |
Originally Posted by fotographer
(Post 31860461)
Most common aircraft.. 777
I wonder if this email from AA to suppose to make us feel important. 777 >>>>>> a321 |
Hours in the sky: 131
Times around the world: 4.5 Destinations: 17 Most Flown: Boeing 777 Top Destinations: New York, Miami, Hong Kong Rank amongst EXP: Top 12% :( JFK-DOH-SGN still to come. |
Hours in the sky: 95
Times around the world: 2 Destinations: 8 Most Flown: Boeing 737 Top Destinations: Grand Cayman, DFW, Miami Rank amongst PLT: Top 22% Pretty happy with that considering I fly maybe once a year for business, and I'll be hitting PPro after Christmas flights |
No email here :(
|
Originally Posted by fotographer
(Post 31860461)
here is what my email said
Hours in the sky... 178 Times around the world 6.5 Most common aircraft.. 777 Rank among EXP 3% But of course I could add my trip over Christmas to this list.. but why I wonder if this email from AA to suppose to make us feel important. Hours in the Sky: 309 Times around the World: 6 Took me a lot longer to fly a shorter distance. I must be flying on slower aircraft. :mad: (Seriously, though, I assume they're using blocked time vs. actual air time.) I was hoping they'd add Hours on the Tarmac or Hours waiting for the Jetbridge... For those who need a reminder, here's last year's thread |
EQD: 49,264
EQM: 139,794 EQS: 26 Renewed CK in Dec 2019, then later earned EXP in Dec 2019. Hours in the sky: 123 Times around the world: 2.5 Destinations: 12 Most Flown: Boeing 777 Top Destinations: Munch, Zurich, New Orleans Award miles earned without flying: 182,055 Award miles earned because you are elite: 207,365 Rank amongst CK: Not stated (I guess it isn't very high - haha) |
I received the email without a top % of EXP- but the EQDs and EQMs that pushed me to re-qualifying only posted this morning- I would guess that the batch process generating this email ran sometime before that. Would be interesting to see if anyone who unambiguously re-qualified prior to a few days ago failed to receive that percentile info. I seem to remember that there was some question about this last year.
|
Originally Posted by flightrisk
(Post 31860698)
Interesting, I was also top 3% EXP:
Hours in the Sky: 309 Times around the World: 6 Took me a lot longer to fly a shorter distance. I must be flying on slower aircraft. :mad: (Seriously, though, I assume they're using blocked time vs. actual air time.) I was hoping they'd add Hours on the Tarmac or Hours waiting for the Jetbridge... For those who need a reminder, here's last year's thread |
Hours in the sky: 195
Times around the world: 4.5 Destinations: 29 Most Flown: Boeing 737 Top Destinations: Chicago, Houston, Orlando Furthest nonstop: 7,488 miles Rank amongst EXP: Top 12% |
Oh!!
and here’s a good one..., upgrades received: 40+ I never kept count. |
Only top 20% of EXP lol....mainly a domestic flyer.
|
For me the high point was the avoided baggage charge statistic, which was >$1,000. Best bit of LT PLT status IMO.
|
Last year, at 4.5 times around the world (165 hours in the sky), I was ranked among the top 19% of Executive Platinum members (based on miles flown). But this year, also 4.5 times around the world (138 hours in the sky), I'm ranked among the top 9% of Executive Platinum members.
How curious that my distance-based ranking among EXP members increased while the distance I actually flew this year decreased. I'm not quire sure what to make of this fact pattern, but it raises some academic questions, for sure: Are comparatively more EXP qualifying this year with short segments? Compared to last year, are a greater proportion of EXP qualifying with primarily J- and F- fares (high EQM multiples)? Have the increased EQD requirements this year led those that qualified last year on mostly Y-fares or PE-fares (low EQM multiples) to not make the cut? [Is the inverse fact-pattern discernible among PP, for example?] (How) has the elimination of most easy paths to bonus EQM & EQD via credit card impacted the mix of EXP members more broadly? Anyway - it's fun that they send these stats out... if anyone were inclined to do so - with more comparative data points - I suppose one could suss out if/how the EXP cohort this year has evolved from last year. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:29 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.