Boeing, FAA Report 737 Aircraft May Have Faulty Parts on Wings
More Mech's?
Lovely https://www.usnews.com/news/national...parts-on-wings Boeing announced that some of its 737 planes, including the 737 Max model that was involved in two deadly crashes, may have faulty parts on their wings. Slat tracks are used to guide the slats, which are parts on an airplane's wing, according to the release. One lot of this part produced by a supplier was found "to have a potential nonconformance." Boeing has not been informed of any issues related to the potential defect and the FAA said it would not cause an aircraft to crash.In a press release Sunday, the aircraft manufacturer said that it was working with the Federal Aviation Administration to inform airlines of a faulty part. Boeing and the FAA are advising 737 operators to inspect the slat track assemblies on certain aircraft models. ... |
This sounds horrible, I'm not frequent flyer -general public.For the past year I've flown inside Europe 9 trips on Boeing 737-800.This news gives me good bumps.
|
Can you please quote the relevant text instead of just posting the link? Thanks!
|
Originally Posted by Uzzar
(Post 31169060)
Can you please quote the relevant text instead of just posting the link? Thanks!
The first sentence is: BOEING ANNOUNCED THAT some of its 737 planes, including the 737 Max model that was involved in two deadly crashes, may have faulty parts on their wings. The aircraft manufacturer said that it was working with the Federal Aviation Administration to inform airlines of a faulty part. Boeing and the FAA are advising 737 operators to inspect the slat track assemblies on certain aircraft models. Boeing has identified 21 737 NGs that are "most likely to have the parts in question," but are advising any airlines operating the model to inspect the aircraft. The company identified 20 737 Max airplanes that also have the potentially defective slat tracks and asked operators to inspect an additional 159 737 Max planes "to ensure a thorough assessment." |
It's just an Airworthiness Directive. Very common. Most likely, you have never been on commercial airliner that has not had an AD issued against it.
This one gives the airlines 10 days to do the inspection. The plane may continue flying until then. The media in the USA, in need of advertising dollars, is naturally going to take anything 737 mechanical related and blow it out of proportion. |
If you bother to read the article it sounds like a very standard sort of maintenance guidance nothing to get in a lather over, but it's on a 737 so it's "News"
|
Moderator note:
I'm beginning to sound like a broken record... If you haven't looked at the FlyerTalk rules recently please do so. Even if you are a seasoned member, as rules do change over time. Please note this rule: https://www.flyertalk.com/help/rules.php#externallinks Linking to content on other websitesFlyerTalk is here for the purpose of sharing meaningful information. Don't simply post a link by itself to another source, such as an article or blog. (See also, Rule 9 — Posting Copyrighted Material.) Posts containing such links should contain enough information so as to be contributive to FlyerTalk itself.If linking to your own blog, to a blog on behalf of someone, or to a blog of which you are a periodic or regular contributor, you must identify that fact in your post and you must include enough content for the FlyerTalk post to stand on its own without following the link. Do not post repeatedly in a manner that has the effect or purpose of driving traffic to a blog or website. Exceptions to this rule include:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:12 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.