Strange denial of boarding on MAN-PHL
Mar 29, 2019, 7:09 pm
#61
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: BOS-LIS-MIA
Programs: DL
Posts: 62
I am a bit confused by the text message content. It says that the agent stated "you need to go past border patrol " - was this interaction at the gate or at check in? If at the gate, they must have passed through border control - or were they saying that the passengers needed to return to passport control to leave?
Going to court won't end the nonsense - it may get your issue resolved, but wouldn't rely on it having any impact on what AA does in the future
Going to court won't end the nonsense - it may get your issue resolved, but wouldn't rely on it having any impact on what AA does in the future
Mar 29, 2019, 7:11 pm
#62
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: MSN
Programs: AA, BAEC Gold
Posts: 3,926
I am a bit confused by the text message content. It says that the agent stated "you need to go past border patrol " - was this interaction at the gate or at check in? If at the gate, they must have passed through border control - or were they saying that the passengers needed to return to passport control to leave?
Mar 29, 2019, 7:11 pm
#63
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,009
We definitely will not stop, I strongly believe we are right, and that AA has to make some
serious adjustments to their CoC. I kind of hope we go all the way to court, maybe it will end this kind of nonsense.
Im still trying to get my friend in here, but for now here
a text he sent me:
serious adjustments to their CoC. I kind of hope we go all the way to court, maybe it will end this kind of nonsense.
Im still trying to get my friend in here, but for now here
a text he sent me:
Mar 29, 2019, 7:18 pm
#64
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: BOS-LIS-MIA
Programs: DL
Posts: 62
right, but they were essentially removing him from the airport because his ticket was no longer valid, and so the only way out of the airport would be how arriving passengers come in. They aren’t going to send him through the security check backwards in order to remain in the UK, they are going to escort him through passport control. MAN airport is a strange series of windowed hallways, this does make sense in context to this (and probably most) airports
Last edited by dflanagin; Mar 29, 2019 at 7:23 pm
Mar 29, 2019, 7:23 pm
#65
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: MSN
Programs: AA, BAEC Gold
Posts: 3,926
right, but they were essentially removing him from the airport because his ticket was no longer valid, and so the only way out of the airport would be how arriving passengers come in. MAN airport is a strange series of windowed hallways, this does make sense in context to the airport, he just doesn’t know airport jargon so well
Mar 29, 2019, 7:25 pm
#66
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: BOS-LIS-MIA
Programs: DL
Posts: 62
Yeah I think they were just telling him what was happening, like I said it was his first flight departing an international airport ever, im not sure he knew what was happening to him at all. Also with a US passport im sure they wanna check the validity just in case.
Mar 29, 2019, 8:30 pm
#67
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 152
https://www.aa.com/i18n/footer/condi...p?locale=en_HK
CHECK-IN TIMES
The times shown on this ticket or itinerary/receipt if applicable are the departure times of the aircraft.
Mar 29, 2019, 9:47 pm
#68
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: SNA
Programs: AA EXP, UA 1K (until it expires then never again), *wood Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 9,239
10 vs 15 vs 30 minutes, whats printed on BPs, whats in the CoCs etc aside, the question that someone in leadership at AA should be asking themselves is: why did this happened? I cannot understand what would make the AA GAs think this was a good idea as it makes no sense whatsoever. To be clear, I'm not doubting the OP or his friend as aacargo/flighaware clearly show they left the gate at 9:43AM which would IME mean they finished boarding and buttoned up before that since you cannot close the door/push until everyone is seated etc.
Putting aside the legal stuff, which again I'm of the view that AA needs to get out their checkbook, this is a completely unforced error on AAs part and one that has no upside for them. Pushing 23 minutes early on a MAN-PHL flight doesn't free up the gate for another AA flight or allow the GAs/ground crew to go work another AA flight at MAN...there's exactly nothing from the series of events that occured which result in a net positive to AA. On the other hand they created bad will with the OP/Friend/others who hear about the situation, financial liability under EU regulations and all they ended up with was a few minutes early to the gate in PHL.
Putting aside the legal stuff, which again I'm of the view that AA needs to get out their checkbook, this is a completely unforced error on AAs part and one that has no upside for them. Pushing 23 minutes early on a MAN-PHL flight doesn't free up the gate for another AA flight or allow the GAs/ground crew to go work another AA flight at MAN...there's exactly nothing from the series of events that occured which result in a net positive to AA. On the other hand they created bad will with the OP/Friend/others who hear about the situation, financial liability under EU regulations and all they ended up with was a few minutes early to the gate in PHL.
Mar 29, 2019, 9:56 pm
#69
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,393
Maybe the GA wanted to leave work early or at least have alonger break?
Mar 29, 2019, 11:16 pm
#71
Moderator: American AAdvantage
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NorCal - SMF area
Programs: AA LT Plat; HH LT Diamond, Maître-plongeur des Muccis
Posts: 62,948
@dflanagin AA Customer Service contacts from Elliott (hint: send a detailed but brief snailmail): https://www.elliott.org/company-cont...ican-airlines/
Last edited by JDiver; Mar 30, 2019 at 10:32 am
Mar 29, 2019, 11:43 pm
#72
Join Date: Oct 2014
Programs: SQ Gold, Marriott Platinum, IHG Diamond Ambassador, DL Silver, AS MVP, B6 Mosaic, QR, EY, KE, CX, PR
Posts: 317
This is not from AA but would like to share a story on PR in MNL airport to Doha. I arrive in the gate area about T-25 with most of passengers already boarded. As the agent scanned my boarding pass another agent suggested to her companion to offload the remaining passengers so they can close the door early. Not sure what was I thinking but I intervened and told them they can't do that to the remaining passengers unless it is already T-10. The agent fires back that the new cutoff rules is T-20 instead of T-10. I politely pointed to them that T-10 is printed in the boarding pass and that they should correct what is printed if the company is enforcing new cutoff rules for boarding. I know it's none of my business if they offload the remaining passengers but it leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
Mar 30, 2019, 5:03 am
#73
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 204
This is not from AA but would like to share a story on PR in MNL airport to Doha. I arrive in the gate area about T-25 with most of passengers already boarded. As the agent scanned my boarding pass another agent suggested to her companion to offload the remaining passengers so they can close the door early. Not sure what was I thinking but I intervened and told them they can't do that to the remaining passengers unless it is already T-10. The agent fires back that the new cutoff rules is T-20 instead of T-10. I politely pointed to them that T-10 is printed in the boarding pass and that they should correct what is printed if the company is enforcing new cutoff rules for boarding. I know it's none of my business if they offload the remaining passengers but it leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
Mar 30, 2019, 6:45 am
#74
Suspended
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Buffalo, but live from suitcase
Programs: Delta, AA, Marriott
Posts: 240
I have had similar experience but squeaked by. They told me the pilot wanted to get off early because of a storm he wanted to avoid. Whether it was true? But there was a lot of turbulence.
But that answer tops all else printed or not. If capt wants to go, he can and you have no recourse
But that answer tops all else printed or not. If capt wants to go, he can and you have no recourse
Mar 30, 2019, 6:46 am
#75
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: BOS-LIS-MIA
Programs: DL
Posts: 62
10 vs 15 vs 30 minutes, whats printed on BPs, whats in the CoCs etc aside, the question that someone in leadership at AA should be asking themselves is: why did this happened? I cannot understand what would make the AA GAs think this was a good idea as it makes no sense whatsoever. To be clear, I'm not doubting the OP or his friend as aacargo/flighaware clearly show they left the gate at 9:43AM which would IME mean they finished boarding and buttoned up before that since you cannot close the door/push until everyone is seated etc.
Putting aside the legal stuff, which again I'm of the view that AA needs to get out their checkbook, this is a completely unforced error on AAs part and one that has no upside for them. Pushing 23 minutes early on a MAN-PHL flight doesn't free up the gate for another AA flight or allow the GAs/ground crew to go work another AA flight at MAN...there's exactly nothing from the series of events that occured which result in a net positive to AA. On the other hand they created bad will with the OP/Friend/others who hear about the situation, financial liability under EU regulations and all they ended up with was a few minutes early to the gate in PHL.
Putting aside the legal stuff, which again I'm of the view that AA needs to get out their checkbook, this is a completely unforced error on AAs part and one that has no upside for them. Pushing 23 minutes early on a MAN-PHL flight doesn't free up the gate for another AA flight or allow the GAs/ground crew to go work another AA flight at MAN...there's exactly nothing from the series of events that occured which result in a net positive to AA. On the other hand they created bad will with the OP/Friend/others who hear about the situation, financial liability under EU regulations and all they ended up with was a few minutes early to the gate in PHL.
What is also infuriating is that my friend, and honestly most passengers, don't know EU regulations; they don't read the CoC, they don't understand airport/airline jargon. I wonder how often this happens and just results in net profit for AA all around. Offering the inevitable $200 eVoucher is insulting, and incurs no loss for the company.
I think their denials are only making it worse for them as well, because the responses have been using check-in time word salad like -
Our check-in times are in place to ensure an on-time departure, and ticket agents can no longer make adjustments to the computers 30 minutes before departure. Unfortunately, Mr. M* was not at the gate before this cut off.