Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > American Airlines | AAdvantage
Reload this Page >

AA just received first Airbus A321neo / A321-253NX / 32Q 1 Feb 2019

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Feb 1, 2019, 2:36 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: JDiver
AA has announced the first 196 seat A321-253NX / A321neo (new engine option), N400AN, manufacturer’s temporary registration D-AVYQ, arrived at PIT 1 February 2019 and enters service April, 2019. Link

Airbus A321neo / 32Q threads (as of 12 March 2019)



AA Airbus A321neo, c/o International Flight Network

There is an existing order of 100 A321neo, IATA designation 32Q, with the first delivery in February 2019. However, American Airlines has reached an agreement with Airbus Industries to defer twenty-two A321neo that were previously scheduled for delivery in 2019, 2020, and 2021 to at least 2024, citing high fuel prices and a weak revenue environment for the move.

The AA A321neo are being delivered with CFM International LEAP-1A engine and Sharklets wingtip devices), giving the aircraft 4,000 nautical miles (7,408 km) range and ETOPS 180 certification. In this “Cabin Flex” NX model fuselage doors 2L and R are deleted.

Seating is 20F, 176Y - 47 MCE seats (F20, Y/MCE47, Y129). The new larger AirSpace XL space overhead bins are used and mood lighting also. A/C + USB power is provided to all seats. IFE is served to your device (free) from an onboard WiFi server. ViaSat Ka band WiFi (fee) is standard.

See illustrations in the first few posts in this thread.

JonNYC: MCE is row 8-11, 17 (overwing exit), 27 (exit row, 5 seats in row,) 18-21 (D,E,F)
F will match the LUS 321 36” pitch, using the same Rockwell Collins MiQ seat used in the 737 MAX 8 and the Oasis refit First/Business cabin (and AA widebody Premium Economy). These MiQ have no footrest.

MCE and Y are reduced to 737 MAX standards (MCE 33”, Y 30”). The seat is the same Rockwell Collins Meridian used in the 737 MAX 8 and “Project Oasis” conversion. The slightly greater diameter of the A320 family fuselage allows a slightly wider seat.

American outlines A321neo network in 2Q19
By Jim Liu, Routes Online link
Posted 23 December 2018 13:50

American Airlines during the weekend of 23DEC18’s schedule update filed planned Airbus A321neo routes, under aircraft code 32Q. Planned A321neo service is scheduled for the second quarter of 2019, with configuration of F20 Y176.

LAX – MCO 02APR19 – 02MAY19 1 daily (AA2361/219)

PHX – ANC 06JUN19 – 19AUG19 1 daily (AA1413/1372)

PHX – LAX 02APR19 – 02MAY19 1 daily (AA820/1895)

PHX – MCO 02APR19 – 02MAY19 1 daily (AA682/1022; Except 21APR19)
Eventually the A321neo is to replace all Hawaii service A321H and 757 aircraft, and deploy on longer non-JFK-LAX or JFK-SFO routes (which are served by the three class A321T).

According to David Seymour, American’s Senior Vice President of Integrated Operations, when they take the A321neo starting in January “that will actually serve as the platform to get certification for our refurbishment and standardization of the 321s... so we can go common configuration.” That effort will start in February.
Currently, though both will be refitted to 190 seats under Project Oasis:

LAA “32B”: F16 (38” pitch), Y165 including 38 MCE (181 total seat count)

LUS A321: F16 (36” pitch), Y171 including 18 MCE (187 total seat count)

(Note: Delta A321 has 192 seats.)

Link to the archived previous thread discussing the A321neo prior to arrival.

Print Wikipost

AA just received first Airbus A321neo / A321-253NX / 32Q 1 Feb 2019

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 1, 2019, 6:15 pm
  #16  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: KHOU/KIAH
Programs: AA EXP | Marriott Bonvoy Titanium| Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 11,245
Originally Posted by bridge29
Welcome aboard Blah Airlines.
The choice of gray for F continues to baffle me. It's so dull.

wish they would go with a red, like JL. Looks so good.
TravelLawyer likes this.
Antarius is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2019, 7:36 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: MIA
Posts: 298
Originally Posted by DataPlumber
It’s doesnt actually “clog up” the network or RF spectrum for that matter. In fact it works just fine. In layman’s terms, let’s just say it’s “magic.”
I happen to work in the same field as you, and let’s just say that getting 100+ devices streaming multi-mbps over wifi is non-trivial. And I don’t expect Viasat or (especially) AA to be good at it.

Last edited by SouthernCross; Feb 1, 2019 at 11:31 pm
SouthernCross is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2019, 7:39 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: MIA
Posts: 298
My point is really that built in IFE is superior for all kinds of different reasons, hardwired connections being one of them. But we all know why AA is ditching it, and it’s not cause people want to stream on their phones.

Last edited by SouthernCross; Feb 1, 2019 at 9:48 pm
SouthernCross is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2019, 7:08 am
  #19  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Rolling Lakes Yacht Club
Posts: 4,985
Originally Posted by SouthernCross


I happen to work in the same field as you, and let’s just say that getting 100+ devices streaming multi-mbps over wifi is non-trivial. And I don’t expect Viasat or (especially) AA to be good at it.
In reality it is trivial. For Viasat and Gogo- this is how they make money and you may find it shocking that they are good at it.

My point is really that built in IFE is superior for all kinds of different reasons, hardwired connections being one of them. But we all know why AA is ditching it, and it’s not cause people want to stream on their phones.
Space, power, weight, maintenance, obsolescence. Makes sense to me why most carriers ditching them. Here's another one to blow your hard-wired mind set...
https://www.gogoair.com/learning-cen...entertainment/
DataPlumber is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2019, 8:50 am
  #20  
Moderator: Travel Safety/Security, Travel Tools, California, Los Angeles; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LAX
Programs: oneword Emerald
Posts: 20,631
Originally Posted by jinglish
The photo in the wiki is definitely not of a neo.
Originally Posted by Geordie405
I was thinking the same thing as it clearly seems to show a door at 2L and that is not there in the Neo.
I've just updated the photo; now, if someone could crop it.
TWA884 is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2019, 9:22 am
  #21  
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Programs: American Airlines
Posts: 141
Originally Posted by 3Cforme
These have less range than a 757-200.
Highlighting why I just don’t get airbus. They make a poor man’s aircraft. They design stuff wings which lead to poorer customer experience in less than ideal flying conditions and the fact that a plane designed more than 40 years ago that is similar size out performs the range on something that is supposedly up to date and fuel efficient is pathetic. I hope Boeing gets that 797 into action so AA can cancel some of the 321neo orders and just get one plane, 797 that will take over the range gap in their fleet that will occur as the 757/767 are complete retired.

Makenit simple:
319/320/321/737: domestic fleet
797/787/777: international fleet

Put down the 330/757/767 and just use neos to replace any older US 321s (though I admit I am u see the belief none are that old, but lines up well if they are).

Just my .02

Cheers,
TG
travelgeek1197 is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2019, 10:28 am
  #22  
Moderator: Travel Safety/Security, Travel Tools, California, Los Angeles; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LAX
Programs: oneword Emerald
Posts: 20,631
Does anyone know what's the minimum runway length needed for the A321neo to take off with maximum load.

The A321H's has weight restrictions departing for LAX from LIH (156 maximum number of passenger - holds 181 - and frequently even less) and OGG (IIRC, approximately 170 passengers max) due to the relatively short runways there. As far as I know, the Neo has the same wing as the A321H, which requires 2,000' more runway for takeoff with a full load of passengers cargo and fuel than the 752.
JDiver likes this.
TWA884 is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2019, 11:42 am
  #23  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: PHL
Programs: AA
Posts: 342
Originally Posted by DataPlumber
In reality it is trivial. For Viasat and Gogo- this is how they make money and you may find it shocking that they are good at it.



Space, power, weight, maintenance, obsolescence. Makes sense to me why most carriers ditching them. Here's another one to blow your hard-wired mind set...
https://www.gogoair.com/learning-cen...entertainment/
Delta clearly thinks in-seat IFE is the way to go and is installing it on all new places with no plans to remove. New in-seat units are as thin and weigh as much as a modern tablet and can be easily replaced with newer models. The idea that in-seat IFE means heavy outdated screens and wires everywhere is outdated.
bridge29 is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2019, 11:48 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 1,285
Originally Posted by bridge29
Delta clearly thinks in-seat IFE is the way to go and is installing it on all new places with no plans to remove. New in-seat units are as thin and weigh as much as a modern tablet and can be easily replaced with newer models. The idea that in-seat IFE means heavy outdated screens and wires everywhere is outdated.
I’ll take high speed WiFi and Netflix streaming over AA IFE screens. The only thing I will miss is the airshow. I don’t think you can stream that on your phone from AA app unfortunately.
Delta also think it’s ok to fly Boeing 717 and MD-80 and not planning to retire it anytime soon. I’ll take OASIS 738Max or 32Q over those ancient planes.
gateH15 is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2019, 11:50 am
  #25  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: KHOU/KIAH
Programs: AA EXP | Marriott Bonvoy Titanium| Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 11,245
Originally Posted by gateH15

I’ll take high speed WiFi and Netflix streaming over AA IFE screens. The only thing I will miss is the airshow. I don’t think you can stream that on your phone from AA app unfortunately.
Delta also think it’s ok to fly Boeing 717 and MD-80 and not planning to retire it anytime soon. I’ll take OASIS 738Max or 32Q over those ancient planes.
other than your bias for new vs old, what exactly is wrong with a 717 or MD 80?
SFO777 and jinglish like this.
Antarius is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2019, 11:55 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 1,285
Originally Posted by Antarius
other than your bias for new vs old, what exactly is wrong with a 717 or MD 80?
nothing is wrong. As an Av geek i don’t get excited flying those planes. Delta definitely beats aa when it comes to soft product. But I think AA has much better hard product.
gateH15 is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2019, 11:56 am
  #27  
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Programs: AAdvantage
Posts: 158
I think this has been discussed before, but does the A321-neo have the range to fly the PHL-Europe routes AA currently uses the 757-200 on? I wonder if the neo will be the type that replaces all 757 aircraft, and we may eventually see an international configuration on the neo?
arc727 is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2019, 11:58 am
  #28  
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 1,285
Originally Posted by arc727
I think this has been discussed before, but does the A321-neo have the range to fly the PHL-Europe routes AA currently uses the 757-200 on? I wonder if the neo will be the type that replaces all 757 aircraft, and we may eventually see an international configuration on the neo?
if you look at the screenshots in the first post it definitely has a range to fly to Western Europe. Probably with a stop in Gamder/Goose Bay during winter month westbound.
gateH15 is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2019, 12:08 pm
  #29  
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 2,279
Originally Posted by Antarius
other than your bias for new vs old, what exactly is wrong with a 717 or MD 80?
31" Y/34" C+/37" F is too much leg room. Also the engines can be really loud if you are in the front half of the plane, especially in F; I hear everyone complains about the noise a lot up there...
jinglish likes this.
Lux Flyer is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2019, 12:22 pm
  #30  
Moderator: American AAdvantage
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NorCal - SMF area
Programs: AA LT Plat; HH LT Diamond, Maître-plongeur des Muccis
Posts: 62,948
Originally Posted by jinglish
The photo in the wiki is definitely not of a neo.
D-AVYQ was the original builder’s reg for N400AA. The depicted aircraft has no 2L, is equipped with sharklets. The photo has been changed by TWA884. Wiki posts are to be updated, etc. by members with 180 days and 180 posts, so ultimately this worked as intended.

Another photo is

from planespottersnet.
jinglish likes this.

Last edited by JDiver; Feb 2, 2019 at 12:28 pm
JDiver is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.