Flight 969 1/31 delays, crew absences
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New York
Programs: Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, Delta Skymiles Platinum
Posts: 650
Flight 969 1/31 delays, crew absences
I'm booked on flight 969 from LAS to JFK today. The inbound from JFK was diverted to ORD, apparently because of an ill flight attendant. The were supposed to be on the ground for 40 minutes, of course it turned into 2 1/2 hours.
So once it got back in the air our new departure time was 1:48 PM. OK, inbound arrives at 1:00 and deplaned. Pilots go on, almost ready to board. Until......they announce that they are "looking for 2 flight attendants" or else we have to wait for them to come in from LAX. And.....another 2 hour delay.
They had all day to make sure they had crew here. And only now they are scrambling? I'm not impressed.
So once it got back in the air our new departure time was 1:48 PM. OK, inbound arrives at 1:00 and deplaned. Pilots go on, almost ready to board. Until......they announce that they are "looking for 2 flight attendants" or else we have to wait for them to come in from LAX. And.....another 2 hour delay.
They had all day to make sure they had crew here. And only now they are scrambling? I'm not impressed.
#4
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: California
Programs: AA EXP...couple hotels and cars too
Posts: 4,548
Annoying.
They lost an attendant in ORD...then when they get to LAS, now they need two?!?
Plus, its not like it would be a surprise. You'd think when the plane left ORD (or even when it got diverted) they would plan for crew and flight needs the rest of the day. It almost seems like they dont think about it until they get ready to board...
During IRROPS, I can look at inbound equipment, track tail numbers, etc, etc...but the whole crew thing is a black box.
They lost an attendant in ORD...then when they get to LAS, now they need two?!?
Plus, its not like it would be a surprise. You'd think when the plane left ORD (or even when it got diverted) they would plan for crew and flight needs the rest of the day. It almost seems like they dont think about it until they get ready to board...
During IRROPS, I can look at inbound equipment, track tail numbers, etc, etc...but the whole crew thing is a black box.
#5
Join Date: Jun 2009
Programs: AA EXP. HH DIAMOND.
Posts: 224
Annoying.
They lost an attendant in ORD...then when they get to LAS, now they need two?!?
Plus, its not like it would be a surprise. You'd think when the plane left ORD (or even when it got diverted) they would plan for crew and flight needs the rest of the day. It almost seems like they dont think about it until they get ready to board...
During IRROPS, I can look at inbound equipment, track tail numbers, etc, etc...but the whole crew thing is a black box.
They lost an attendant in ORD...then when they get to LAS, now they need two?!?
Plus, its not like it would be a surprise. You'd think when the plane left ORD (or even when it got diverted) they would plan for crew and flight needs the rest of the day. It almost seems like they dont think about it until they get ready to board...
During IRROPS, I can look at inbound equipment, track tail numbers, etc, etc...but the whole crew thing is a black box.
#6
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: AUS
Programs: AA Exec Platinum/MM, DL Gold/MM, Hilton Diamond, Accor Platinum, Hertz Presidents Circle
Posts: 6,975
I'm booked on flight 969 from LAS to JFK today. The inbound from JFK was diverted to ORD, apparently because of an ill flight attendant. The were supposed to be on the ground for 40 minutes, of course it turned into 2 1/2 hours.
So once it got back in the air our new departure time was 1:48 PM. OK, inbound arrives at 1:00 and deplaned. Pilots go on, almost ready to board. Until......they announce that they are "looking for 2 flight attendants" or else we have to wait for them to come in from LAX. And.....another 2 hour delay.
They had all day to make sure they had crew here. And only now they are scrambling? I'm not impressed.
So once it got back in the air our new departure time was 1:48 PM. OK, inbound arrives at 1:00 and deplaned. Pilots go on, almost ready to board. Until......they announce that they are "looking for 2 flight attendants" or else we have to wait for them to come in from LAX. And.....another 2 hour delay.
They had all day to make sure they had crew here. And only now they are scrambling? I'm not impressed.
As usual, however, the real preventable problem from the customer's standpoint is the poor communication. Not only do the extra delays seem to pop up from nowhere, there is never any real explanation of the process or reasons. IME BA does a great job at this. I remember sitting in WAW waiting for a delayed flight to LHR. The pilot came out to the gate area, took the mic and gave a detailed presentation of the weather and flow control issues that were creating the delay.
Overall I do think AA runs one of the sloppier operations among the major carriers, but I don't think this incident is evidence of that.
#8
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New York
Programs: Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, Delta Skymiles Platinum
Posts: 650
Annoying.
They lost an attendant in ORD...then when they get to LAS, now they need two?!?
Plus, its not like it would be a surprise. You'd think when the plane left ORD (or even when it got diverted) they would plan for crew and flight needs the rest of the day. It almost seems like they dont think about it until they get ready to board...
During IRROPS, I can look at inbound equipment, track tail numbers, etc, etc...but the whole crew thing is a black box.
They lost an attendant in ORD...then when they get to LAS, now they need two?!?
Plus, its not like it would be a surprise. You'd think when the plane left ORD (or even when it got diverted) they would plan for crew and flight needs the rest of the day. It almost seems like they dont think about it until they get ready to board...
During IRROPS, I can look at inbound equipment, track tail numbers, etc, etc...but the whole crew thing is a black box.
It appears they don't even keep their own people well informed. The incoming flight finally landed in LAS at 1 PM. At about 1:25 the pilots boarded, and the ground staff opened the door to the gate. They appeared ready to board. Then all of a sudden the stories start about "looking for 2 flight attendants". They said they were looking in LAS but worst case was that they would have them come on a flight from LAX that was due at 3:25. So even the pilots and ground staff didn't know? That seemed very strange. Then they post the new ETA as 3:45. At about 3:00 they announce "we have good news". 2 flight attendants are coming from Phoenix! That flight arrives about 4PM. What happened to LA? Anyway, they did come from Phoenix and we finally got out at 4:45 PM, just under 6 hours late.
And just to add insult to injury, the wifi on the flight did not workd. Then, we landed at JFK a little early, about 12:20 AM, only to have no gate crew waiting. We had to wait short of the gate for about 10 minutes.
All in all not a great day.
#9
Moderator: Travel Safety/Security, Travel Tools, California, Los Angeles; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LAX
Programs: oneword Emerald
Posts: 20,626
It is possible, however, quite rare, for scheduling to reassign cabin crews from other flights at a non-hub airport.
Depending on the situation, deadheading crews may have priority over revenue passengers. They could have asked for volunteers or IDB'ed passengers to get replacement flight attendants to LAS.
#10
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2006
Programs: AAdvantage PP
Posts: 13,913
Yes, that was what I was upset about. Stuff happens, I hope the ill FA is OK, I am sure they don't divert easily. And even the further delay at ORD did not really bother me, it was not much of a surprise. BUT they knew all day they had to staff this flight, and it appears they dropped the ball. But I don't really know. The whole thing was a little strange.
It appears they don't even keep their own people well informed. The incoming flight finally landed in LAS at 1 PM. At about 1:25 the pilots boarded, and the ground staff opened the door to the gate. They appeared ready to board. Then all of a sudden the stories start about "looking for 2 flight attendants". They said they were looking in LAS but worst case was that they would have them come on a flight from LAX that was due at 3:25. So even the pilots and ground staff didn't know? That seemed very strange. Then they post the new ETA as 3:45. At about 3:00 they announce "we have good news". 2 flight attendants are coming from Phoenix! That flight arrives about 4PM. What happened to LA? Anyway, they did come from Phoenix and we finally got out at 4:45 PM, just under 6 hours late.
And just to add insult to injury, the wifi on the flight did not workd. Then, we landed at JFK a little early, about 12:20 AM, only to have no gate crew waiting. We had to wait short of the gate for about 10 minutes.
All in all not a great day.
It appears they don't even keep their own people well informed. The incoming flight finally landed in LAS at 1 PM. At about 1:25 the pilots boarded, and the ground staff opened the door to the gate. They appeared ready to board. Then all of a sudden the stories start about "looking for 2 flight attendants". They said they were looking in LAS but worst case was that they would have them come on a flight from LAX that was due at 3:25. So even the pilots and ground staff didn't know? That seemed very strange. Then they post the new ETA as 3:45. At about 3:00 they announce "we have good news". 2 flight attendants are coming from Phoenix! That flight arrives about 4PM. What happened to LA? Anyway, they did come from Phoenix and we finally got out at 4:45 PM, just under 6 hours late.
And just to add insult to injury, the wifi on the flight did not workd. Then, we landed at JFK a little early, about 12:20 AM, only to have no gate crew waiting. We had to wait short of the gate for about 10 minutes.
All in all not a great day.
There may have been FAs in LAX available but then pulled for staffing a LAX flight. While the communications could have been better it's operations is being hit upon with multiple needs, again particularly with crew hitting with monthly legal limits and unable to fly again until the next day.
#11
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SLC/HEL/Anywhere with a Beach
Programs: Marriott Ambassador; AA EXP 3MM; AS MVP, Hilton Gold, CH-47/UH-60/C-23/C-130 VET
Posts: 5,234
Could also have been swapping crews in Vegas and missing FA's from that crew because of sickness or otherwise.
Keep in mind that a Hawaiian had an FA pass away while working recently. I suspect crews of other US airlines think about that. Plus, its the end of the month and extreme weather. Things happen sometimes.
Keep in mind that a Hawaiian had an FA pass away while working recently. I suspect crews of other US airlines think about that. Plus, its the end of the month and extreme weather. Things happen sometimes.