Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > American Airlines | AAdvantage
Reload this Page >

American Airlines’ Roadmap to ‘Long-Term Success’

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

American Airlines’ Roadmap to ‘Long-Term Success’

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 25, 2019, 11:14 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New York and Vienna
Programs: PA WorldPass Platinum, AA, DL, LH. GHA Black, SPG and HHonors Gold
Posts: 3,870
American Airlines’ Roadmap to ‘Long-Term Success’

American Airlines presented employees with a three-pronged plan that I found rather interesting (and therefore assigned one of our reporters at FBT to write about as well).

Perhaps looking at the dismal results of the November 2018 survey, the plan calls for making the airline’s culture “a competitive advantage” as well as creating a “world-class customer experience.” It also calls for building the airline “to thrive forever.”

It also mentions a new employee recognition program.

There are no details on much of what it presents but it is interesting food for thought. Please look at the chart attached - it is a tall order so it will be interesting to see how the airline succeeds in the end.

The analysis is here:

Analyzing American Airlines’ Roadmap to ‘Long-Term Success’

The three-pronged plan calls for making the airline’s culture “a competitive advantage” as well as creating a “world-class customer experience.” It also calls for building the airline “to thrive forever.”

The airline wants 2019 to be the year it leverages the benefits of its merger with US Airways, with the enhancement of its in-flight offerings, improvement of the airport experience it offers, and improvement of overall safety and reliability. It also wants customers to be more “likely to recommend” American by virtue of what it is undertaking...

<SNIP>






This link is to an online source to which I contribute and/or have a financial interest.
JDiver likes this.
jspira is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2019, 11:40 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Programs: AAdvantage, MileagePlus, SkyMiles
Posts: 4,158
What stands out to me is to install power on 88% of their aircraft. In 2019. Nice. This will definitely reduce a lot of moaning about pmUS aircraft.
MrAndy1369 is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2019, 11:55 am
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Programs: DL 1 million, AA 1 mil, HH lapsed Diamond, Marriott Plat
Posts: 28,190
'Run the safest and most reliable operation in our history.'

They need to compare performance to the industry's best, not themselves. 99.6% 'controllable' completion factor isn't going to get it done.
samwise6222 and AANYC1981 like this.
3Cforme is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2019, 12:07 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: New York
Programs: AA, CX, Hyatt, Marriott
Posts: 1,484
No mention of Oasis huh???
TXguy and Spanish like this.
andersonCooper is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2019, 12:18 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: BOS-DCA
Programs: AA ExePlat
Posts: 217
Originally Posted by MrAndy1369
What stands out to me is to install power on 88% of their aircraft. In 2019. Nice. This will definitely reduce a lot of moaning about pmUS aircraft.
5 out of six legs on LUS planes without power so far this year.
tampatravel likes this.
jsieds is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2019, 12:25 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 3,698
Originally Posted by 3Cforme
'Run the safest and most reliable operation in our history.'

They need to compare performance to the industry's best, not themselves. 99.6% 'controllable' completion factor isn't going to get it done.
Also, no one gives a crap about D-0. D-0 is actively harmful to customers. What we care about is A-0 (although I'd say A-15 is totally fine, so the DOT is probably on to something there). But even that would be most usefully measured as "fraction of passengers that arrive on time" not "fraction of flights that arrive on time", because then they'd actually be incented to pay attention to connecting passengers instead of treating it as a big win that you pushed back from the gate 10 minutes early but left 15 connecting passengers behind in the process.

Last edited by jordyn; Jan 25, 2019 at 1:38 pm Reason: Consistent punctuation
jordyn is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2019, 12:39 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,631
Interesting that under "World-class customer experience" they do not even pretend to want to provide better customer service by ground staff or on-board staff (cf. Delta). And I guess they can't, since the culture is so ingrained, and staff have no reason to do more than gossip in the galley after making announcements about how they are there primarily for our safety.
jspira, tampatravel and TXguy like this.
SeeBuyFly is online now  
Old Jan 25, 2019, 1:01 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: AUS
Programs: AA Exec Platinum/MM, DL Gold/MM, Hilton Diamond, Accor Platinum, Hertz Presidents Circle
Posts: 6,961
In-flight product improvements are limited to more seat plugs, bigger bins and wifi. No mention that the latter means removing seat-back IFE, which many prefer, and no mention of decreased pitch, tiny bathrooms, and horrible new F seats, which IMO all net to a significant in-flight downgrade. Do they really think this presentation is going to convince FAs who have to deal with all this every day that the in-flight product is "improved"?
grapkoski, jspira and TXguy like this.
Stripe is online now  
Old Jan 25, 2019, 1:06 pm
  #9  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: NYC
Programs: DL Diamond, AAdvantage EXP, Hyatt Explorist, HHonors Diamond, Avis First
Posts: 7,344
There's a severe lack of vision in that document and a pretty average bar being set for themselves
AANYC1981 is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2019, 1:20 pm
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: KHOU/KIAH
Programs: AA EXP | Marriott Bonvoy Titanium| Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 11,222
Originally Posted by Stripe
In-flight product improvements are limited to more seat plugs, bigger bins and wifi. No mention that the latter means removing seat-back IFE, which many prefer, and no mention of decreased pitch, tiny bathrooms, and horrible new F seats, which IMO all net to a significant in-flight downgrade. Do they really think this presentation is going to convince FAs who have to deal with all this every day that the in-flight product is "improved"?
I don't think the F seats are bad. OT, but whats bad about them? The current ones on the 738 and LAA airbii feel like park benches.
Antarius is online now  
Old Jan 25, 2019, 1:27 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: San Francisco
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 369
SFO lounge construction under "Create a World-Class Customer Experience" -- hopefully in the new T1 and not the current T2 location! No club closures, please.
potus18 is online now  
Old Jan 25, 2019, 1:45 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Programs: HHonors, TrueBlue, Delta SkyMiles, Hyatt Discoverist, Starwood Preferred Guest, American Airlines.
Posts: 2,035
American wants to increase EPS by 40% but then as another goal, they want to install TV's and wifi on a large number of aircraft, increase customer service quality, conduct construction work at their lounges, deliver 30 new gates between two airports, increase employee training, and whatever else that will cost them a significant amount of money. Investors should having meetings now as to when the CEO will be fired when they don't reach their goal(s).

Start by adding transfer partners from the large banks instead of forcing someone to either fly or get an AA card to earn AA miles.

Then you can move to the outdated flight atmosphere American provides (lack of wi-fi, seat-back entertainment, and an attitude adjustment for the few miserable flight attendants).

How about making the wifi free for first class domestic fliers?

In addition to that... How about fixing the wifi issues on planes where it doesn't work? In March I flew from JFK to RSW and the wifi didn't work for even one second on that flight. I felt like I was flying back in the 90's. Some people might think IFE is stupid, but what's stupid is having a lack of technology when all of the other mainstream carriers have it.
tampatravel and AANYC1981 like this.
mikesyr18 is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2019, 2:02 pm
  #13  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Programs: AAdvantage PP
Posts: 13,913
There isn't anything material here. So AA is going to fly a safe airline, hopefully get flights to their destination on time and fix up a few ACs (by the way the SFO AC is relatively new and one of the nicest lounges in the system). How about showers at PHL, CLT and PHX? Other than getting power to LUS A/C pretty much a big yawn.
MiamiAirport Formerly NY George is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2019, 2:16 pm
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Programs: Sometimes known as [ARG:6 UNDEFINED]
Posts: 26,673
Originally Posted by AANYC1981
There's a severe lack of vision in that document and a pretty average bar being set for themselves
Agreed. I didn't see anything resembling a stretch goal anywhere. Get to 32% of planes with more overhead space? Honestly?

And there remain hordes of planes with no MCE other than bulkhead and exit rows.
DenverBrian is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2019, 2:43 pm
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL
Programs: American Airlines
Posts: 29,973
Looks like company confidential info to me.
enviroian is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.