Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > American Airlines | AAdvantage
Reload this Page >

AA Corporate Security takes aim at my circuitous routing (ticket validity)

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Jun 17, 2019, 8:37 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: JDiver
American Airlines may intervene in overly circuitous routing as covered by the AA Conditions of Carriage


Ticket validity link to these Conditions of Carriage

Tickets are valid for travel only when used with all terms and conditions of sale.

Your ticket is valid only when:

Travel is to/from the cities on your ticket and in your trip record
You meet all the fare requirements

Fare requirements, like dates, special purpose or status, may include:

  • Dates of stay (a Saturday night, weekend, etc.)
  • Military status (to qualify for a military fare)
  • Official government business (to qualify for a government fare)
  • Attendance at an event (to qualify for a meeting or convention fare)

Your ticket is not valid when:
  • You don't meet the dates of stay, purpose or status requirements for the fare
  • We find that the ticket was bought using an exploitative practice

Exploiting fare rules

Reservations made to exploit or circumvent fare and ticket rules are strictly prohibited.

Examples include (but are not limited to):

  • Purchase a ticket without intending to fly all flights to gain lower fares (hidden cities)
  • Buy a ticket without intent to travel, including to gain access to our airport lounges or other facilities
  • Combine 2 or more roundtrip excursion fares end-to-end to circumvent minimum stay requirements (back-to-back ticketing)
  • Book a ticket in someone's name without the person's consent (which is illegal)
  • Hold reservations for reasons including securing upgrades, blocking seats or obtaining lower fares

If we find evidence that you or your agent are using an exploitive practice, we reserve the right to:

  • Cancel any unused part of the ticket
  • Refuse to let the passenger fly and check bags
  • Not refund an otherwise refundable ticket
  • Charge you for what the ticket would have cost if you hadn't booked it fraudulently.

Fare errors

If we sell a fare in error, we have the right to cancel the ticket. This includes fare errors, computer errors and third party errors (human or computer). We make every effort to prevent, detect and correct errors as soon as possible.

When we issue a mistaken fare, we'll void the ticket, give a full refund and notify you within:

  • 72 hours after we learn of the mistaken fare
  • At least 24 hours before departure if you bought the ticket less than 72 hours before departure
Print Wikipost

AA Corporate Security takes aim at my circuitous routing (ticket validity)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 9, 2019, 8:07 pm
  #106  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
Exclamation

Originally Posted by anabolism
..So, Jon is saying...
NO. Stop please.
JonNYC is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2019, 8:45 pm
  #107  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: KHOU/KIAH
Programs: AA EXP | Marriott Bonvoy Titanium| Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 11,247
Originally Posted by JonNYC
I've explained this too many times already and it's not that complicated.
No disrespect, but the fact that there is still ongoing confusion on my side and others, portends to it either being complex or not explained clearly... or that we are all collectively stupid.
ijgordon, deeruck and DCP2016 like this.
Antarius is online now  
Old Jan 9, 2019, 9:25 pm
  #108  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,597
Originally Posted by anabolism
(Bolding added.) To my reading, the "if necessary" clause means that AA may not arbitrarily alter or omit stopping places just because they feel like it. The wording clearly gives them the right to do so during delays or irregular operations. Wording elsewhere allows AA to change schedules. I don't see a right for AA to arbitrarily change the routing absent an operational need.
if my memory of 1st post is correct, it wasn't arbitrary - it occurred after a schedule change required that new flights be booked
Dave Noble is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2019, 9:37 pm
  #109  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New York City + Vail, CO
Programs: American Airlines Executive Platinum, Marriott Bonvoy Ambassador Elite
Posts: 3,226
I wonder if people somehow managed to get tickets changed from the AA flight numbers to a code-share flight number during IRROPS or a schedule change--in which case, I sure AA would be much more concerned about lost revenue than crediting RDM/EQD but maybe I'm not reading in-between the lines correctly as I am also confused.
Antarius likes this.
donotblink is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2019, 9:38 pm
  #110  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Manhattan Beach, California
Programs: BMI Diamond Club Gold forever
Posts: 6,367
It’s true, some people said they were putting a 1x on the front end of some AA fares and it would cause the fare to earn as distance instead of fare (which was insanely cheap). For the exIndia fares it also often dropped the India premium ticket tax. But again, both things (tax dump and rdm earning) have nothing to do with permitted routings, those are more serious issues in my mind. I think dumping is exploiting seams in the system that calculates taxes and is fun to do on ITA to understand the black box on the other end but cheating (and of dubious legality) and not something I would try to ticket/fly. But when a fare says unlimted transfers or lets me route on someone elses superior product... I’m game.

Hearing AA sent moles in to private groups to learn these tricks... I can only laugh. I’m not even a TA and I found all of these fares and how to maximize them using pretty basic tools. I didnt even have a tool that allowed me to search by filing date, so it was a struggle to hunt/peck for city pairs to get all those 2007/2008 fares with the good rules. Pretty funny that AA couldn’t figure these things out on their own with what I assume to be much more powerful tools!!
stephem is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2019, 2:53 am
  #111  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by dakaix
Speaking from a BAEC perspective OP, and based on these maps, you're still getting the same number of Tier Points with the new routing as you were on the original. Slightly less Avios admittedly.

Unfortunately though this is the downside of using non-refundable accommodation in connection to TP runs, particularly on tight nightstops. Your travel insurer might be able to assist further here (under the guise of "travel disruption"), but otherwise I would venture this will be an painful learning opportunity.
Lesson being to book lodging on arrival at the airport where the overnight stay is taking place? That can work to reduce the risks of being hit by AA in a way the OP was hit.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2019, 3:25 am
  #112  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 136
Originally Posted by anabolism
So, Jon is saying that it wasn't that the OP was abrasive to an agent who then flagged the itinerary for review, but that AA had people ("moles" I suppose you could say) in some groups where people were talking about ways to get an itinerary to credit as distance rather than fare, to earn far more RDM and EQD than would otherwise be the case, and the person was able to find the OP's itinerary from participation in the group.
In all honesty I think it was a minor schedule change that required re-validation and the member of staff that got assigned my ticket for re-validation flagged it. How the tickets got amended by AA and re-issued multiple times over several months is beyond me.

I sent Jon a DM on 22nd November seeking advice. There was no response, except for some tweets on 24th November with suggestions of fraud which has become the subject of much confusion in this thread. I'm still confused but I won't go there as my mother taught me, if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all.

I'm not aware of any groups that discuss exploitative ticketing practices or forcing itineraries to credit differently. If it does exist, it's certainly above my pay grade.

There are many threads throughout FT that discuss how to maximise a fare within the published fare rules but I do not consider this exploitative or fraudulent.
BA707 is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2019, 5:51 am
  #113  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Originally Posted by anabolism
That provides for AA's refusing to book a reservation that is made to exploit or circumvent a fare or ticket rule, or cancel (with refund) one that was made that way. It does not provide for arbitrary reroute. It's also not what I consider plain English, because fundamentally, reservations that exploit (meaning "make full use of and derive benefit from") fare and ticket rules are exceedingly common. One could reasonably say that FT itself exists to help people exploit fare and ticket rules. Now, circumventing fare or ticket rules is clearly grounds for refusing to issue a ticket or cancelling (with refund) one that was made. But the two are very different.
No, it is a clear part of a contract to which the passenger agrees. Whether AA rejects the booking at the moment it is made or later when the violation comes to light is irrelevant. In this case, the violation came to light during an unrelated ticket reissue. Perhaps if that had never happened, OP could have flown the original routing. But, that would not have changed the potential violation.
Often1 is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2019, 7:32 am
  #114  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 152
Originally Posted by anabolism
(Bolding added.) To my reading, the "if necessary" clause means that AA may not arbitrarily alter or omit stopping places just because they feel like it. The wording clearly gives them the right to do so during delays or irregular operations. Wording elsewhere allows AA to change schedules. I don't see a right for AA to arbitrarily change the routing absent an operational need.
This seems applicable and clear to me

Sometimes we have to make adjustments to our operation, and between the time you book and the day you depart, there may be changes to:
  • The type of plane you're flying on
  • Your seat
  • The airline that operates your flight
  • The number of stopovers or stopover cities
  • Departure or arrival times


https://www.aa.com/i18n/customer-ser...ulesoperations



JonNYC likes this.
jliehr is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2019, 9:55 am
  #115  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
Originally Posted by jliehr

This seems applicable and clear to me..
Me too.
jliehr likes this.
JonNYC is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2019, 10:09 am
  #116  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Programs: AA (EP), Hilton (Diamond), Marriott Bonvoy (Titanium)
Posts: 8,937
Originally Posted by Dave Noble
if my memory of 1st post is correct, it wasn't arbitrary - it occurred after a schedule change required that new flights be booked
You and a few others have stated unequivocally that airlines can arbitrarily change routing on a ticket.
anabolism is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2019, 10:21 am
  #117  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,407
Originally Posted by anabolism
You and a few others have stated unequivocally that airlines can arbitrarily change routing on a ticket.
With other airlines, I've successfully argued against particular routing changes during IROPs. These were cases where I wanted, and had already paid more for, particular easier airports for immigration/customs lines and connections (avoid the international terminal at ORD, for instance), airports that were less prone to ATC delays or WX problems, and routings where I had a long international premium cabin segment and a short domestic FC flight (and had deliberately avoided a long domestic segment and a much shorter international segment so that I could get more sleep on the flights). YMMV, but if I paid more for particular routings or aircraft types (domestic flat beds or international suites), I would expect a refund of the fair difference and some customer service gesture if I'm involuntarily moved to a cheaper routing. YMMV, and I realize that this isn't the issue here, but I don't consider it reasonable for an airline to impose involuntary routing changes in many circumstances.
ijgordon and Antarius like this.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2019, 10:21 am
  #118  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Programs: AA (EP), Hilton (Diamond), Marriott Bonvoy (Titanium)
Posts: 8,937
Originally Posted by Often1
No, it is a clear part of a contract to which the passenger agrees. Whether AA rejects the booking at the moment it is made or later when the violation comes to light is irrelevant. In this case, the violation came to light during an unrelated ticket reissue. Perhaps if that had never happened, OP could have flown the original routing. But, that would not have changed the potential violation.
You and a few other people have stated that airlines have the right to arbitrarily change routing (absent any operational necessity). I've flown quite a lot, and participated in FT for many years (admittedly well below the level of participation of many) and have never heard of this right, nor ever heard any instances of it happened, so I have asked if you or anyone else making the assertion could point to a CoC clause, fare rule, or IATA provision that provides the right. I ask this because I would like to understand this asserted ability of airlines. Dave Noble posted a CoC clause that gives AA the ability to change or omit connections when necessary. I'm still trying to understand the right of airlines to arbitrarily change routing that you, Dave Noble, and I think someone else have repeatedly stated
anabolism is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2019, 10:25 am
  #119  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Programs: AA (EP), Hilton (Diamond), Marriott Bonvoy (Titanium)
Posts: 8,937
Originally Posted by jliehr


This seems applicable and clear to me

Sometimes we have to make adjustments to our operation, and between the time you book and the day you depart, there may be changes to:
  • The type of plane you're flying on
  • Your seat
  • The airline that operates your flight
  • The number of stopovers or stopover cities
  • Departure or arrival times


https://www.aa.com/i18n/customer-ser...ulesoperations



Yes, airlines have the clear ability to change their schedules, and schedule changes can necessitate changing the route of a ticket. But several people have asserted that airlines can arbitrarily change the route of a ticket without there being any operational necessity. I'm trying to understand where this assertion comes from and what its scope is.
anabolism is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2019, 10:27 am
  #120  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 3,698
Originally Posted by JonNYC
There were discussion group(s) where members exchanged various scams revolving around the PTY, Etc. fares (how to force them to credit improperly, etc.). AA had a specialist in the group.

Oops.
It would be cool if AA sent "spies" to pay attention to threads like the ones that describe checkin problems in FAT rather than just treating their customers like enemies all the time.
JDiver, JonNYC, deeruck and 5 others like this.
jordyn is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.