Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > American Airlines | AAdvantage
Reload this Page >

Would You Complain About This (To Illustrate How Afraid Passengers Must Have Been)

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Would You Complain About This (To Illustrate How Afraid Passengers Must Have Been)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 3, 2018, 7:48 am
  #31  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: MSN
Programs: AA, BAEC Gold
Posts: 3,928
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
There is a (BA) A320 SOP scenario - which I haven't yet seen - where on arrival people will be asked not to stand up for disembarkation until the front AKH bins under the aircraft are removed, otherwise the surge to the front will risk tipping the aircraft, nose down, as everyone surges forward. Can't see that working very well on AA (or indeed BA).
There seem to be a few cases of aircraft going down on their tails as the pax disembark and the cargo doesn't.
MADPhil is offline  
Old Dec 3, 2018, 7:51 am
  #32  
atp
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 20
Originally Posted by UAPremierGuy
I'd be interested to hear what a commercial pilot has to say about this. All I can say from personal experience, is that I've been on plenty of flights (mainly UA, less so AA) where the pilot's specifically tell us they are waiting for takeoff numbers while after push-back and taxi, usually while sitting in the penalty box. I think the delay itself is complaint-worthy, but I'll reserve judgment on whether this should have been caught before push-back until I hear from those more in the know than I.
In short, we get our final load closeout, or numbers when we are taxiing to the runway. There is a planning department in Dallas that figures out exactly how much weight the aircraft can take depending on the current weather, runways in use, planned fuel routing, and passenger load. Any of these things can change up to the moment of departure - i.e. - tower doesn't allow you to use the planned runway and needs you to take a shorter or more restrictive runway. One you push back from the gate, ramp and customer service enter their final number in their computers. These numbers are combined with everything else to produce the final weight and balance.

Absolutely nothing here was unsafe. We cannot under any circumstances take off without the final load closeout. We can't even program our onboard computers without these final numbers.

Let me give you an extreme example of a change that could significantly change your numbers - you are pushing back from the gate and can carry the full planned load and fuel. On taxi out, you are assigned a new runway due to shifting winds. This new runway also has a obstacle at the end of the runway which requires a higher climb gradient to avoid the big buildings or mountains at the end. During taxi out it also starts to rain and the temperature dips below 10C, requiring the use of wet runway numbers and the use of engine anti-ice which reduces available engine power unless you are in a bleed-less 787. Suddenly, the entire weight plan is tossed out the window. If more engine thrust than planned isn't available and the use of a different less restrictive runway isn't available, you have to return to the gate. The FAA and our company do not allow you to take off overweight by even 1 pound. This example happens occasionally in airports such as Boston, San Francisco, Las Vegas, etc....

In the end, everything worked as planned. It's a complicated juggling act and sometimes the planners get the numbers wrong, but the final numbers are always correct and verified by the flight crew - which often times happens just a few minutes before takeoff. We always know our maximum allowable takeoff weight for the runway we will actually be using. There is nothing unique about the 737 compared to the rest of the fleet.
JonNYC, lokijuh, enviroian and 8 others like this.
atp is offline  
Old Dec 3, 2018, 8:13 am
  #33  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Bay Area
Programs: WN A-List, AA good-riddance, Safeway Club Card Extraordinaire
Posts: 3,851
Seems like the real problem was the flight crew discussing utterly mundane and routine (but marginally scary-sounding) business within earshot of jumpy pax.
Science Goy is offline  
Old Dec 3, 2018, 8:43 am
  #34  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Houston
Programs: UA 1K and Million Miler, *A Gold, Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, Hertz Five Star,
Posts: 1,301
Interesting post as written (in title). PLanes leave gates ALL THE TIME with pending items as it helps them get in line to have a better chance of making planned schedule. The key is Take Off, not pushback.

Last edited by Collierkr; Dec 3, 2018 at 8:59 am Reason: revised for sanity
Collierkr is offline  
Old Dec 3, 2018, 8:44 am
  #35  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 836
Originally Posted by ricktoronto
The Captain said it was too heavy to take off, period. Fuel was not an issue at all. They don't drive over a scale, so 5 minutes before takeoff someone, somewhere read what should have been known before leaving the gate that they had a lot of excess weight and it was all in the tail. Earlier the Captain said we're getting away early and they are just loading the cargo in the aft and we're off 10 minutes early.
So either the original loadmaster double checked or someone else did, with a scant margin. Leaving early might have even compromised that.
If someone knew the weight of the containers and pallets and such as they loaded at some point they knew the total and did not stop.
Since complaints here consider no headphones or a non working TV for two hours, unsafe takeoff weight in the wrong part of the plane, to me sounds quite worse than that.
You're all up in arms over nothing. Getting the final numbers on taxi out is done very frequently. There was no 'unsafe takeoff weight in the wrong part of the plane'. The final performance numbers dictated that a few pounds needed to come off (a couple people and their bags). The plane would have had no issue actually taking off with these people on, but it would have been illegal to do so, which meant they had to go back to reduce the load a bit. You're freaking out over absolutely nothing.
FriscoHeavy is offline  
Old Dec 3, 2018, 9:01 am
  #36  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Wiltshire
Programs: BAEC Blue
Posts: 108
Originally Posted by MADPhil
There seem to be a few cases of aircraft going down on their tails as the pax disembark and the cargo doesn't.
As a former Airline Pilot and Flight Dispatcher ( I have recently retired after almost 40 years in the industry) "Tail Tipping" as it is called is far more of a risk particularly on the A321 series (but also on the A320 as well) aircraft than nose tipping as mentioned by CWS although under certain circumstances that could happen. For this reason I would often instruct the head loader to only load two or three containers in the aft hold and then load the front hold prior to continuing to load the aft hold in order to avoid tail tipping whilst passengers are boarding and, when unloading an arriving aircraft, the reverse would be true ie unload two or three containers from the aft hold first especially if the containers in the rear are particularly heavy ( for this reason we often loaded baggage in the rear hold as this would automatically be offloaded first on arrival). There are specific weight limits that are calculated not just by the aircraft manufacturer but also by the airline itself ( with a built in margin) to avoid this scenario. Also, it was not uncommon for the Ops dept at departure to contact Ops at the arrival station to advise of the tail tipping potential in order that correct unloading was performed.
Trident 3B is offline  
Old Dec 3, 2018, 10:32 am
  #37  
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 246
Originally Posted by ricktoronto
The Captain said it was too heavy to take off, period. Fuel was not an issue at all. They don't drive over a scale, so 5 minutes before takeoff someone, somewhere read what should have been known before leaving the gate that they had a lot of excess weight and it was all in the tail. Earlier the Captain said we're getting away early and they are just loading the cargo in the aft and we're off 10 minutes early.
So either the original loadmaster double checked or someone else did, with a scant margin. Leaving early might have even compromised that.
If someone knew the weight of the containers and pallets and such as they loaded at some point they knew the total and did not stop.
Since complaints here consider no headphones or a non working TV for two hours, unsafe takeoff weight in the wrong part of the plane, to me sounds quite worse than that.
You are making a mountain out of a molehill. Nothing unusual happened here.
I am a pilot flying for a major US airline.

If near take off weight, pilots will make an estimate to give to the baggage handlers and gate agents as to how many passengers and freight/bags can be carried.

As others have stated, final weights are calculated by computer remotely as the pilots taxi out and sent to the airplane. In this case, the pilots discovered they were over weight which can happen because the gate agent put on one or two more pax, the rampers put on one or two more bags, the fueler added a couple hundred extra pounds that they thought, the temp at the airport went up slightly, the wind changed direction or decreased in intensity or it started raining. All these factors are out of control of the pilots. Yet they returned, made the changes and then took off. No rules were violated nor were they nearly violated. No pilot will take off overweight. All these details are stored for every flight and subject to audit by the FAA, a pilot would have his license suspended for taking off overweight.
Now lets consider a few things.
1. The calculations are all based on losing an engine at the most critical time so unless that happens, even IF you tried to take off overweight you would be perfectly fine unless you are also unfortunate enough to lose an engine at just that critical point..
2. Often the weight that restricts the takeoff has nothing to do with taking off or not, but has to do with the weight upon landing, the weight to clear enroute obstacles in the event of an engine failure or the established structural limits of the airplane rather than whether there is enough runway or not.
3. And most significantly, did anyone weigh you or your bags? Unless you weight 165lbs and every other passenger on the plane weighed the same, the airplane WAS significantly heavier than the calculated weight on takeoff and yet you survived. This is because, in the eyes of the FAA, each passenger weighs 195lbs WHICH INCLUDES THEIR CARRYONS and each checked bag weighs 30lbs. Any calculations made are just estimates and there to satisfy regulations rather than being accurate calculations of the airplanes weight. For example, when I flew smaller jets, we couldn't bring carryons on board as there was rarely room. They were gate checked so they weighed 30lbs. Sometimes, if overweight, the rampers would bring gate checked bags into the cabin and cram them into the overheads or strap them into seats. They magically went from weighing 30lbs to weighing nothing. Make sense? Of course not, but the FAA was happy.

So you are blowing an unfortunate but routine incident out of all proportion.
wrp96 and AA100k like this.
Raymoland is offline  
Old Dec 3, 2018, 11:11 am
  #38  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 111
Originally Posted by atp
In short, we get our final load closeout, or numbers when we are taxiing to the runway. There is a planning department in Dallas that figures out exactly how much weight the aircraft can take depending on the current weather, runways in use, planned fuel routing, and passenger load. Any of these things can change up to the moment of departure - i.e. - tower doesn't allow you to use the planned runway and needs you to take a shorter or more restrictive runway. One you push back from the gate, ramp and customer service enter their final number in their computers. These numbers are combined with everything else to produce the final weight and balance.

Absolutely nothing here was unsafe. We cannot under any circumstances take off without the final load closeout. We can't even program our onboard computers without these final numbers.

Let me give you an extreme example of a change that could significantly change your numbers - you are pushing back from the gate and can carry the full planned load and fuel. On taxi out, you are assigned a new runway due to shifting winds. This new runway also has a obstacle at the end of the runway which requires a higher climb gradient to avoid the big buildings or mountains at the end. During taxi out it also starts to rain and the temperature dips below 10C, requiring the use of wet runway numbers and the use of engine anti-ice which reduces available engine power unless you are in a bleed-less 787. Suddenly, the entire weight plan is tossed out the window. If more engine thrust than planned isn't available and the use of a different less restrictive runway isn't available, you have to return to the gate. The FAA and our company do not allow you to take off overweight by even 1 pound. This example happens occasionally in airports such as Boston, San Francisco, Las Vegas, etc....

In the end, everything worked as planned. It's a complicated juggling act and sometimes the planners get the numbers wrong, but the final numbers are always correct and verified by the flight crew - which often times happens just a few minutes before takeoff. We always know our maximum allowable takeoff weight for the runway we will actually be using. There is nothing unique about the 737 compared to the rest of the fleet.

Minus the rain, this happened on one of my flights out of SJO. Winds increased and the captain came on while taxiing and announced we are now over weight and wont make it over the mountain if we dont offload some weight. Now that sounds a tad scarier than what the OP posted.
First we offloaded 6 non revs. Waited 30 minutes. Offloaded all baggage. Waited 30 minutes, then they needed 24 volunteers. I took the free hotel and voucher and spent another day in Costa Rica. Point is, this stuff happens and really isnt a big deal.
sevastras is offline  
Old Dec 3, 2018, 12:05 pm
  #39  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: SJO - MAN - LAX
Programs: MileagePlus Gold, Avis PP, National EE, Lifemiles Silver, ConnectMiles Gold
Posts: 532
Originally Posted by sevastras
Minus the rain, this happened on one of my flights out of SJO. Winds increased and the captain came on while taxiing and announced we are now over weight and wont make it over the mountain if we dont offload some weight. Now that sounds a tad scarier than what the OP posted.
First we offloaded 6 non revs. Waited 30 minutes. Offloaded all baggage. Waited 30 minutes, then they needed 24 volunteers. I took the free hotel and voucher and spent another day in Costa Rica. Point is, this stuff happens and really isnt a big deal.
Hah, classic.

Thankfully the now existing RNAV departures get rid of most of these issues. Before, if you didn't make it you flew into a volcano.

Now even the heavies take off into the mountain and make the turns.
Redwood839 is offline  
Old Dec 3, 2018, 12:44 pm
  #40  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: DFW
Programs: UA peon (+decades 1K), AA Exec Plt
Posts: 1,117
Originally Posted by skylady
Sometimes the pilots do not get the closeout numbers until well in to taxi, but they always get them before T/O, even if they have to wait at the end of the taxi way.
And if it is time for them to take off and they haven't received the information yet do they wait with everyone behind them, step out of line, go to the end of the line, ... ?

I guess anything to push off in time.

How easy is it to return to the gate when you are at the end of the taxi way?
Michael D is offline  
Old Dec 3, 2018, 12:53 pm
  #41  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,603
Originally Posted by ricktoronto
I was imagining a 5 mile flight butt first into the water.
Did you crap your pants?
boboqui is offline  
Old Dec 3, 2018, 1:06 pm
  #42  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: NT Australia
Programs: QF WP
Posts: 4,160
Here’s an example from Australia of where a weight and balance issue wasn’t picked up before take off (on a 737, not a smaller plane). As a counterpoint to the airmidwest incident

nancypants is offline  
Old Dec 3, 2018, 3:05 pm
  #43  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: AA Platinum, HH Diamond, Delta Platinum
Posts: 130
As a prior C-130 loamaster, I am GLAD the pilot caught this! I was also at Bagram when the 747 crashed a few years ago. Loads MUST be thoroughly checked for weight and balance. Although retired, I still like flying in military aircraft, and although any thing can happen, it gives me a sense of security.
choklit is offline  
Old Dec 3, 2018, 3:24 pm
  #44  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: London, UK
Programs: A3 *G, Hertz PC, Accor Platinum, IHG Platinum, occasionally AS, LM, BA/Avios, Bonvoy.
Posts: 87
Originally Posted by Michael D
And if it is time for them to take off and they haven't received the information yet do they wait with everyone behind them, step out of line, go to the end of the line, ... ?

I guess anything to push off in time.

How easy is it to return to the gate when you are at the end of the taxi way?
If they don't have the numbers they'll usually go to one side, a holding area, another taxiway that isn't being used, the infamous 'penalty box', etc. Most airports have the capability to handle this. If they're in the line for departure and don't have numbers and there isn't a way out they just enter the runway and continue taxying to turn off at the first suitable exit. Happens every day.
2P or not 2P is offline  
Old Dec 3, 2018, 3:26 pm
  #45  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: AA Executive Platinum/Million Miler, Marriott Titanium Elite-Lifetime, Hilton Gold
Posts: 3,210
Originally Posted by Michael D
And if it is time for them to take off and they haven't received the information yet do they wait with everyone behind them, step out of line, go to the end of the line, ... ?
I believe ground control would put the aircraft in the penalty box if the flight isn't ready to take off.
USFlyerUS is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.