Originally Posted by mizzou miles
(Post 30479662)
Wonder if this (hopefully) means the end of BOSJFK on the A321T
If anything, this solidifies the BOSJFK 321Ts I assume for aircraft rotation - it looks like 2x/day glancing at the schedule in June |
Originally Posted by no2chem
(Post 30480004)
Wait, what? Why would you want to end BOSJFK on the 321Ts? Lie flat seat for MCE price? Unless you're talking about delays ex-JFK because of late incoming from LAX/SFO.
If anything, this solidifies the BOSJFK 321Ts I assume for aircraft rotation - it looks like 2x/day glancing at the schedule in June |
Originally Posted by bridge29
(Post 30480023)
I don't think it does at all. Look at the flight times, it looks like the planes originate in LAX and turn around in BOS.
|
Originally Posted by PHL
(Post 30479850)
And sill no PHL-LAX with the A321T. :( I would have thought BOS and PHL have a similar premium demand for the LAX market.
|
Originally Posted by mizzou miles
(Post 30479662)
Wonder if this (hopefully) means the end of BOSJFK on the A321T
Originally Posted by PHL
(Post 30479850)
And sill no PHL-LAX with the A321T. :( I would have thought BOS and PHL have a similar premium demand for the LAX market.
|
Originally Posted by 3Cforme
(Post 30480189)
I don't know about premium demand on that route specifically but overall, PHL has 35% less domestic O&D than BOS. It punches way below its weight for metro size.
|
Originally Posted by beachfan
(Post 30479971)
Without more planes, they have to come from either LAX-JFK or SFO-JFK.
BOS-LAX and the JFK routes are prone to IRROPS in winter (and sometimes summer). If they fly a mixture of the 2 class and 3 class 321s, it will be pretty miserable to get bounced from a 3 class to a 2 class. The J seat in the 2class sucks. Google flights shows 6 AA nonstops a day LAX to BOS. AA is announcing 2 of them will be 321T in each direction Great, so a 2/3 chance you WON'T be on it, and if you book it and there's an issue, you DEFINITELY won't be on it. It'll be nice when it works though, and better than not having the option at all. Best case scenario they make it more uniform and find a couple more 321Ts to put on it. If it proves profitable, I'm sure they will. Would definitely like to see them do the same on their nonstop long haul routes from LAX to PHL, CLT and RDU (and of course MIA) |
the 10 3-cabin F seats will be a waste - should be using an intl-configured 75W
|
Originally Posted by PHL
(Post 30479850)
And sill no PHL-LAX with the A321T. :( I would have thought BOS and PHL have a similar premium demand for the LAX market.
|
Originally Posted by Colin
(Post 30480323)
the 10 3-cabin F seats will be a waste - should be using an intl-configured 75W
|
Originally Posted by Colin
(Post 30480323)
the 10 3-cabin F seats will be a waste - should be using an intl-configured 75W
|
For main cabin and main cabin extra, which would you choose? 321T or 321S (LAA 2 class)
|
Originally Posted by Raymond Lu
(Post 30480673)
For main cabin and main cabin extra, which would you choose? 321T or 321S (LAA 2 class)
|
Originally Posted by Austin787
(Post 30480198)
AA is responding to Delta, United, and JetBlue who fly flat beds on LAX-BOS. No competitor flies flat beds on LAX-PHL. However, one of AA's LAX-PHL flights is on A330 which has flat beds.
|
321S also has personal tv installed, no IFE? thanks
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:35 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.