KY youth group misses AA flight in CVG

Old Aug 21, 2018, 9:17 pm
  #76  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,548
Originally Posted by Lux Flyer
So I know the news reported they removed the bags from the flight, but why? I understand that international flights have positive bag matching, but the flight in question wasn't the international segment. Shouldn't the bags have still been able to fly on the domestic leg then never loaded on the international segment? Or does AA positive bag match for all segments of an international itinerary?
Even if the bags were loaded and could have flown on the 1st segment, doing so would not have been a good thing for the passengers whose bags they were, would it?

I know any other country where I travel, bags are not left onboard a flight if the passengers are not travelling
Dave Noble is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2018, 9:20 pm
  #77  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South Park, Metropolis
Programs: AA LT PLT 3MM, Hilton/Marriott/SPG/Club Carlson GLD, IHG PLT
Posts: 4,606
Originally Posted by Lux Flyer
So I know the news reported they removed the bags from the flight, but why? I understand that international flights have positive bag matching, but the flight in question wasn't the international segment. Shouldn't the bags have still been able to fly on the domestic leg then never loaded on the international segment? Or does AA positive bag match for all segments of an international itinerary?
Positive bag is for international, I bet the real reason for removal is to allow them to have some clothing and toiletries. Imagine if bags where allowed to go, then following day they had to claim 40pcs of luggage and re check them again. That would have been time consuming.

Last edited by arollins; Aug 21, 2018 at 9:28 pm
arollins is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2018, 10:36 pm
  #78  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New York City + Vail, CO
Programs: American Airlines Executive Platinum, Marriott Bonvoy Ambassador Elite
Posts: 3,223
Originally Posted by arollins
The repercussions on this are enormous, as mentioned above, 40 families have a negative image and opinion of AA, but it also shows a level of insensitivity on AA regarding charity work. I wonder if this group had made prior arrangements with AA to organize this and perhaps get a group rate. I can only hope that this is used as a learning experience on AA and perhaps loosen up a bit and allow some flexibility on the GA.
Honestly, having 40 families have a negative image and opinion of AA isn't a big deal to a company that flies 51.1 million passengers annually and has a market capitalization of ~ $25 billion. Unless one of those parents is a travel manager at a major corporation, in which case, this still probably wouldn't have a huge impact.
donotblink is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2018, 10:38 pm
  #79  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,548
Originally Posted by arollins

Positive bag is for international, I bet the real reason for removal is to allow them to have some clothing and toiletries. Imagine if bags where allowed to go, then following day they had to claim 40pcs of luggage and re check them again. That would have been time consuming.
I doubt that that was the reason. The passengers were travelling internationally , just not on that flight. If the airline had transported the bags, they would have ended up left behind at the connection point and the potentally have to be flown back to the origin
Dave Noble is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2018, 5:14 am
  #80  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: PHL
Programs: AA EXP, HH Diamond, Owner of 2,000 TWA shares
Posts: 812
Originally Posted by Dave Noble
I doubt that that was the reason. The passengers were travelling internationally , just not on that flight. If the airline had transported the bags, they would have ended up left behind at the connection point and the potentally have to be flown back to the origin
Yes, this^^^. Add in the possibility of a re-reoutig to accommodate this large group ad there's no telling where the bags end up. AA didn't remove the bags out of the goodness of their heart. They did it because it was the easiest thing for them to do.
Uncle Nonny is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2018, 5:59 am
  #81  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 56
Epic fAAil. And the usual, tedious blame the passenger thing. "well they should have known to . . ." No they should not, unless there are specific instruction that the group ignored.

If the airline can't process a group, then the group tix shouldn't be sold. Period.

Group shows up as instructed, before the counters are even open. Airlines fails. End of story.
Spiff, jordyn, wrp96 and 2 others like this.
bostonkarl is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2018, 6:07 am
  #82  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: MSY; 2-time FT Fantasy Football Champ, now in recovery.
Programs: AA lifetime GLD; UA Silver; Marriott LTTE; IHG Plat,
Posts: 14,517
Originally Posted by donotblink
Honestly, having 40 families have a negative image and opinion of AA isn't a big deal to a company that flies 51.1 million passengers annually and has a market capitalization of ~ $25 billion. Unless one of those parents is a travel manager at a major corporation, in which case, this still probably wouldn't have a huge impact.
Until it hits the news, and then 4,000,000 people are getting that negative image.
ijgordon and george 3 like this.
swag is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2018, 7:32 am
  #83  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,548
Originally Posted by bostonkarl
Epic fAAil. And the usual, tedious blame the passenger thing. "well they should have known to . . ." No they should not, unless there are specific instruction that the group ignored.

If the airline can't process a group, then the group tix shouldn't be sold. Period.

Group shows up as instructed, before the counters are even open. Airlines fails. End of story.
Indeed - if, as suggested, the check in counters wereclosed, how could getting there any earlier have helped anyway
Dave Noble is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2018, 7:54 am
  #84  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: New York
Programs: AA EXP 1.0mm, not sure where I am with hotels these days
Posts: 2,795
Originally Posted by donotblink
Due to airline consolidation, most people don't have much real choice anymore among airlines.
True. However, I have friends and colleagues who've sworn off an airline due to slights similar to this. While there are fewer options, there remains options.
george 3 is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2018, 9:25 am
  #85  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Houston
Programs: UA 1K and Million Miler, *A Gold, Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, Hertz Five Star,
Posts: 1,301
Don't know about AA, but UA has group checkin facilities at most of their hubs. I am thinking this was booked as a group and hence there should have been some coordination through "group check-in" no?
Collierkr is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2018, 9:36 am
  #86  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: The FT AA forum, until it no longer wants me.
Programs: CK or bust
Posts: 1,913
Originally Posted by donotblink
Honestly, having 40 families have a negative image and opinion of AA isn't a big deal to a company that flies 51.1 million passengers annually and has a market capitalization of ~ $25 billion. Unless one of those parents is a travel manager at a major corporation, in which case, this still probably wouldn't have a huge impact.
S P O T O N.

It's CVG. Even if were a major station, it's just 40 passengers and once in a year flyers families. That's not part of AA's business model and as long as it's not front page anywhere and no meaningful liability that they'd want to avoid in the future arose, no real changes to operating procedures.
enpremiere is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2018, 9:37 am
  #87  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Programs: Rapid Rewards, AAdvantage, SkyMiles
Posts: 2,931
Originally Posted by Collierkr
Don't know about AA, but UA has group checkin facilities at most of their hubs. I am thinking this was booked as a group and hence there should have been some coordination through "group check-in" no?
AA might however CVG is an outstation for them with only a couple mainline flights a day to DFW and the rest of the destinations/flights being Eagle operated. I doubt their check-in counter is that big let alone have a separate "group check-in".
DCP2016 is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2018, 2:10 pm
  #88  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: PHL
Programs: AA EXP, HH Diamond, Owner of 2,000 TWA shares
Posts: 812
Originally Posted by Collierkr
Don't know about AA, but UA has group checkin facilities at most of their hubs. I am thinking this was booked as a group and hence there should have been some coordination through "group check-in" no?
I see it in PHL and SFO. Oddly enough, my last SFO I saw the CSA turn a group of 8 away saying they weren't really a group, just a large family.
Uncle Nonny is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2018, 2:45 pm
  #89  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SLC/HEL/Anywhere with a Beach
Programs: Marriott Ambassador; AA EXP 3MM; AS MVP, Hilton Gold, CH-47/UH-60/C-23/C-130 VET
Posts: 5,234
AA has a group check in counter in T5 at LAX. Unfortunately, it is adjacent to the Priority Counter and when I was at the counter with an issue recently, checkin was a mess because they were trying to deal with a group who didn't speak English well, several had overweight bags, and who appeared to have purchased basic economy tickets and were having a hard time understanding why they needed to check carryons.
C17PSGR is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2018, 3:14 pm
  #90  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Houston
Programs: UA 1K and Million Miler, *A Gold, Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, Hertz Five Star,
Posts: 1,301
Originally Posted by DCP2016
AA might however CVG is an outstation for them with only a couple mainline flights a day to DFW and the rest of the destinations/flights being Eagle operated. I doubt their check-in counter is that big let alone have a separate "group check-in".
good point.
Collierkr is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.