Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > American Airlines | AAdvantage
Reload this Page >

AA's LAX-JFK route one of the world's most profitable

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

AA's LAX-JFK route one of the world's most profitable

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 6, 2018, 12:56 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: San Francisco, CA USA // UA 1K 2 Million Miler, AA EXP 2MM, HH Diamond, SPG Plat // Easily found on SFO-ORDs
Posts: 2,726
AA's LAX-JFK route one of the world's highest revenue

Interesting story here. Fifth-highest revenue (#1 is BA's LHR-JFK), at $698 million per year for AA. Beats out UA's SFO-EWR route.

Last edited by 1K-SFO; Jul 6, 2018 at 1:17 pm
1K-SFO is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2018, 1:13 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Land of 10,000 Upgrades
Posts: 9,465
The subject of the article is revenue, not profit.
E55, Markie, jasondc and 2 others like this.
UpgradeMe is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2018, 1:17 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: RDU <|> MMX
Programs: AA EXP 2MM, SK EBS
Posts: 12,468
The article is titled "World's Most Profitable Flights" but the ranking is done by revenue, which is not profitability.

Edit: see UpgradeMe beat me to it
IAHtraveler and Yoshi212 like this.
JJeffrey is online now  
Old Jul 6, 2018, 1:52 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Programs: Chase Sapphire Reserve, WFBF
Posts: 1,573
Originally Posted by JJeffrey
The article is titled "World's Most Profitable Flights" but the ranking is done by revenue, which is not profitability.

Edit: see UpgradeMe beat me to it
Amazing that writers at Forbes don't know the difference
jasondc and JDiver like this.
wetrat0 is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2018, 2:10 pm
  #5  
dll
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: LAX
Programs: AA Gold (prev. Ex Plat for 10 years); DL Plat; UA Gold; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 2,338
Though I would imagine that AA's LAX-JFK is in fact more profitable than Singapore's LHR-SIN, or BA's JFK-LHR, since fuel is such a big part of the expense there. And CRAZY to see MEL-SYD is #2 . That's...bonkers.
dll is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2018, 3:11 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: australia
Posts: 5,762
Originally Posted by dll
And CRAZY to see MEL-SYD is #2 . That's...bonkers.
I can easily understand why MEL-SYD would be so high-up. SYD-MEL, on the other hand, wouldn't be in the top 100
E55 likes this.
3544quebec is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2018, 8:18 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: New York
Programs: AA, CX, Hyatt, Marriott
Posts: 1,484
Similar discussion already on BA: Highest revenue airline routes in the world

There are serious doubts on data integrity of the report from that post.
andersonCooper is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2018, 8:57 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Programs: DL 1 million, AA 1 mil, HH lapsed Diamond, Marriott Plat
Posts: 28,190
It's not even highest revenue routes: it's carrier airport pairs.
3Cforme is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2018, 9:34 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: YYF/YLW
Programs: AA, DL, AS, VA, WS Silver
Posts: 5,951
Originally Posted by dll
And CRAZY to see MEL-SYD is #2 . That's...bonkers.
That actually doesn’t surprise in the least. This is measuring total revenue, not per seat or per flight. There’s tons of traffic on that route because it’s short (<1.5 hours gate to gate) enough so that lots of business folks do multiple day trips a week but there’s no other reasonable option (9 hours to drive; train takes longer). And with only two significant airlines, QF being the significantly larger, not a lot of competition for that business traffic. QF and VA each have hourly flights all day with flights every 15 minutes — some of them on widebodies (at least as of a few years ago) — at peak hours. So that’s a boatload of available revenue between by far the two major cities in Australia. No analog anything like it in the US or Europe: any flight that short can be done by car or train quickly enough so that those options are competitive, and airport security/overhead is much more of a hassle in the US and Europe than for domestic Australia.

This list is somewhat silly in many ways, though. One is that it considers AA/BA and VS/DL separate carriers in tabulating JFK-LHR revenue, which is of course incorrect.
ashill is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2018, 10:03 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: LA
Posts: 58
Originally Posted by wetrat0
Amazing that writers at Forbes don't know the difference
The Forbes website is largely "crowd-funded" and written by unpaid or lowly paid "contributors" who are bloggers, not journalists, and whose stories receive little or no editing. This has pretty much destroyed the credibility of Forbes (at least its web presence). Although this article is not going to win a Pulitzer, the problem seems really with the headline, which uses the word "profit." The story itself doesn't.
Rikki3072 is offline  
Old Jul 7, 2018, 4:59 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: YYJ
Posts: 4,137
The initial report was published by OAG. Forbes writers are simply rehashing it.
cedric is offline  
Old Jul 7, 2018, 5:49 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Beantown! (BOS)
Programs: AA PtPro (2 MM); Hilton Diamond; Hertz President Cr; DL SkyMiles; UA MileagePlus
Posts: 3,437
2006 CNBC aired episode of American Airlines on their A Week in the Life series program. In the program American Airlines gave insight to their operation. Revenue management, at that time the top guy at the revenue management said 80% tickets sold were controlled by revenue management software and fares were set by the software, and 20% of situations requires human intervention to override software. The cargo division said South America is most profitable for AA Cargo and top destination for cargo from South American is NYC area and Southern California. The top guy at the cargo department said the cargo department continuously requests wide body aircraft on MIA-JFK/EWR/LAX.

to CNBC episode on Vimeo.

On the show American showed the profit of individual flights. Showed one DFW-BDL 737 flight, cheapest fare was somewhere around $50 and only less than 10 of those fares were sold and most expensive fare sold was somewhere of $700 where passenger was sitting in Main Cabin. All 16 F seats were occupied by FF upgrades and there was not a single F fare sold on that flight.

They showed AA 1 JFK-LAX (operated by 767-200 back then) and showed profit calculation. Total ticket sales, total cargo sales, total luggage fees, total onboard liquors and food sales, etc. Then AA subtracted fuel cost, salary for pilots, salary for FAs, maintenance cost, airport fees, liquor and food catering cost, etc. After all were calculated AA said that this particular flight made a profit of $210, yes, only $210.

It was just one example of one particular flight and it was 2006.
It was just a snapshot of one flight on one day. For example DFW-BDL flight shown on the show made around $3000 profit, but AA said that was exception and majority of flights does not earn that much profit.

Last edited by JDiver; Jul 28, 2018 at 1:15 pm Reason: Insert video link
AlwaysAisle is offline  
Old Jul 7, 2018, 11:22 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Programs: UA Million Mile, Mileage Plus Premier 1K, SkyMiles Gold Medallion, AAdvantage Gold
Posts: 875
Originally Posted by AlwaysAisle
2006 CNBC aired episode of American Airlines on their A Week in the Life series program. In the program American Airlines gave insight to their operation. Revenue management, at that time the top guy at the revenue management said 80% tickets sold were controlled by revenue management software and fares were set by the software, and 20% of situations requires human intervention to override software. The cargo division said South America is most profitable for AA Cargo and top destination for cargo from South American is NYC area and Southern California. The top guy at the cargo department said the cargo department continuously requests wide body aircraft on MIA-JFK/EWR/LAX.

On the show American showed the profit of individual flights. Showed one DFW-BDL 737 flight, cheapest fare was somewhere around $50 and only less than 10 of those fares were sold and most expensive fare sold was somewhere of $700 where passenger was sitting in Main Cabin. All 16 F seats were occupied by FF upgrades and there was not a single F fare sold on that flight.

They showed AA 1 JFK-LAX (operated by 767-200 back then) and showed profit calculation. Total ticket sales, total cargo sales, total luggage fees, total onboard liquors and food sales, etc. Then AA subtracted fuel cost, salary for pilots, salary for FAs, maintenance cost, airport fees, liquor and food catering cost, etc. After all were calculated AA said that this particular flight made a profit of $210, yes, only $210.

It was just one example of one particular flight and it was 2006.
It was just a snapshot of one flight on one day. For example DFW-BDL flight shown on the show made around $3000 profit, but AA said that was exception and majority of flights does not earn that much profit.
That is extremely interesting, but I do not think it is accurate for todays AA. In 2006, LAA made $231 million and LUS made $304 million. In 2017, AA made $1.9 billion after taxes.
DA201 is offline  
Old Jul 7, 2018, 1:24 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: PHL
Programs: AA EXP, HH Diamond, Owner of 2,000 TWA shares
Posts: 812
Then came the baggage fees........and the windfall. Businesses with small margins need to be efficient. AA is far from it (as we all know from their IT infrastructure). They started with the fuel surcharges then added the baggage fees. Revenue from baggage fees have increased upwards of 30x in the last 20 years. There was also a time where it cost $25 to change your ticket. There's no reason to charge $200 for this nonsense. AA hasn't increased it's efficiency, they've increased their inane fees to cover their lack of efficiency. They operate like banks now.
Uncle Nonny is offline  
Old Jul 7, 2018, 1:28 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Bay Area
Programs: WN A-List, AA good-riddance, Safeway Club Card Extraordinaire
Posts: 3,851
Originally Posted by Uncle Nonny
There's no reason to charge $200 for this nonsense.
The fact that people pay it is a perfectly legitimate reason.
Science Goy is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.