Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > American Airlines | AAdvantage
Reload this Page >

AA1897 SAT - PHX emergency descent, ELP divert 3 Jun 2018 (hail)

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

AA1897 SAT - PHX emergency descent, ELP divert 3 Jun 2018 (hail)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 5, 2018, 7:25 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 153
I am shocked that the nose got such extreme damage...
upsidedown is offline  
Old Jun 5, 2018, 7:52 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: DCA/IAD
Programs: AA EXP; 1W Emerald; HHonors Diamond; Marriott Gold; UA dirt
Posts: 7,816
Looking at that photo, I would bet there is more damage than just the nose cone and wind screen. Leading edges, skin above cockpit. Think about your car after a big hailstorm with all the pits. Then think about an A319 flying at 400 miles per hour and hitting those stones.
JDiver likes this.
IADCAflyer is offline  
Old Jun 5, 2018, 7:57 am
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Programs: AA
Posts: 14,730
Originally Posted by DenverBrian
No other choices at 35K feet? I would think at that flight level and speed, the pilots wouldn't want to go into even a "mild" rainstorm. Must have been a wall of clouds in front of them?
Our local meteorologist shared radar images on Twitter that showed a line of red/orange thunderstorms with a small gap of green which is where the pilot tried to go. So yes, it was a pure wall of storms.
JDiver likes this.
wrp96 is offline  
Old Jun 5, 2018, 8:09 am
  #19  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Boston, USA
Programs: AA Platinum Pro, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 233
Originally Posted by IADCAflyer
Looking at that photo, I would bet there is more damage than just the nose cone and wind screen. Leading edges, skin above cockpit. Think about your car after a big hailstorm with all the pits. Then think about an A319 flying at 400 miles per hour and hitting those stones.
I'd certainly want to have the fan blades inspected! It'd be like pitching rocks into them.
scolbath is offline  
Old Jun 5, 2018, 8:24 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: DFW
Programs: AA EXP, LT Gold
Posts: 3,146
Originally Posted by scolbath
I'd certainly want to have the fan blades inspected! It'd be like pitching rocks into them.
Oh, those things are hardened steel! It's like putting ice in a blender! Too bad there wasn't a catch-all behind it to make some margaritas in ELP when they landed!
JDiver likes this.
econometrics is offline  
Old Jun 5, 2018, 5:51 pm
  #21  
Moderator: American AAdvantage
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NorCal - SMF area
Programs: AA LT Plat; HH LT Diamond, Maître-plongeur des Muccis
Posts: 62,948
More photos out there, these from Storm Chasers.
Attached Images    

Last edited by JDiver; Jun 5, 2018 at 5:58 pm
JDiver is offline  
Old Jun 5, 2018, 5:54 pm
  #22  
Moderator: American AAdvantage
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NorCal - SMF area
Programs: AA LT Plat; HH LT Diamond, Maître-plongeur des Muccis
Posts: 62,948
The cockpit crew made an excellent difficult landing. But USDOT and AA may have a bone to pick with their routing choices given DEN ATC and recent PiReps warnings. (Storm Chasers)
Attached Images   
JDiver is offline  
Old Jun 5, 2018, 6:59 pm
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Programs: Sometimes known as [ARG:6 UNDEFINED]
Posts: 26,687
Very much Monday morning quarterbacking, I know, especially because we only have a static radar pic here and don't know exactly what it looked like at the time the plane entered the front...yet...it sure seems like there was a shorter and more open route:



Last edited by DenverBrian; Jun 5, 2018 at 7:12 pm
DenverBrian is offline  
Old Jun 5, 2018, 7:27 pm
  #24  
Moderator: American AAdvantage
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NorCal - SMF area
Programs: AA LT Plat; HH LT Diamond, Maître-plongeur des Muccis
Posts: 62,948
Originally Posted by DenverBrian
Very much Monday morning quarterbacking, I know, especially because we only have a static radar pic here and don't know exactly what it looked like at the time the plane entered the front...yet...it sure seems like there was a shorter and more open route:

...
True this. But the ATC warnings and pireps... it’ll be sorted by AA and the regulators. Hella good airmanship getting it down and landing uneventfully at ELP, regardless.
JDiver is offline  
Old Jun 5, 2018, 8:08 pm
  #25  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: RNO
Programs: AA/DL/UA
Posts: 10,770
Since the radar photo was taken "long" (by weather standards) after getting hit by hail, since there's a path all the way to the ground, I would assume there were storms in that spot back then. It's both clear (after landing in ELP) and points in the direction of PHX. They turned to go north then west, presumably to avoid weather.
Kevin AA is online now  
Old Jun 5, 2018, 8:16 pm
  #26  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Programs: Sometimes known as [ARG:6 UNDEFINED]
Posts: 26,687
Originally Posted by Kevin AA
Since the radar photo was taken "long" (by weather standards) after getting hit by hail, since there's a path all the way to the ground, I would assume there were storms in that spot back then. It's both clear (after landing in ELP) and points in the direction of PHX. They turned to go north then west, presumably to avoid weather.
Yep, the investigators will have a better handle on the exact radar picture at the time decisions were made.

It feels to me like more of an ATC error or poor communication among pilots ahead of the flight reporting the level of turbulence/weather.

If they actually "threaded the needle," it's very concerning to me. I do not want my flight "threading a needle" thinking they can squeak by severe weather. I'd much prefer a turnaround to that.
DenverBrian is offline  
Old Jun 5, 2018, 9:23 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: LAX/BUR, RDU
Programs: DL SM, AAdvantage, SPG
Posts: 1,360
Looking through the Convective SIGMETs issued that night, at 2355Z, there was a warning of 2 inch hail in an area covering much of Eastern New Mexico. (The SIGMETs are a pain to decipher, so I could be wrong though).

This SIGMET seemed to have deterred most aircraft from flying across that area, but based on flight-tracker PlaneFinder, there were at least 3 other aircraft that flew through that "gap" in the weather. The problem with severe/extreme weather is that it can be localized, so it doesn't surprise me that no other aircraft reported such damage. Based on the track of AA1897 and the weather radar archive, my non-professional opinion is that it flew a little too far north for whatever reason, and went right into the hail core of the storm.

Golf-ball sized hail (1.75-2 inches) at >400mph can definitely cause that kind of damage
FlyerWx is offline  
Old Jun 6, 2018, 8:18 pm
  #28  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wichita
Posts: 628
Here is a detailed write-up from an aviation meteorology point of view: Mike Smith Enterprises Blog: Aeronautical Malpractice? Flying Through a Hailstorm!

These happen far too frequently.
JDiver and HofstraJet like this.
KansasMike is offline  
Old Jun 6, 2018, 11:23 pm
  #29  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CLT
Programs: AA EXP; Avis PC; Hertz PC; Marriott LT Gold; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 1,133
Originally Posted by KansasMike
Here is a detailed write-up from an aviation meteorology point of view: Mike Smith Enterprises Blog: Aeronautical Malpractice? Flying Through a Hailstorm!

These happen far too frequently.
Very interesting. Good read. Thanks.
HofstraJet is offline  
Old Jun 6, 2018, 11:31 pm
  #30  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 172
A large thunderstorm can spit hail out it's top higher than 50,000 feet. It then can move up to 20 miles from the storm and fall in clear skies. Hail is also largely invisible to onboard weather radar.

Stuff happens.
CDSEA is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.