Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > American Airlines | AAdvantage
Reload this Page >

LUS Management Shift to Building AA as a Premium Airline (?)

LUS Management Shift to Building AA as a Premium Airline (?)

Old Apr 19, 2018, 8:44 am
  #1  
Moderator: American AAdvantage
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NorCal - SMF area
Programs: AA LT Plat; HH LT Diamond, Matre-plongeur des Muccis
Posts: 62,948
LUS Management Shift to Building AA as a Premium Airline (?)

Gary Leff has a most interesting article, which details the weather change with the Parker administration from advocating and planning Low Cost Carrier operations to choosing improvements and further building a premium airline, though there seem to be some potholes in that path.

How US Airways Management Learned the Importance of a Premium American Airlines Product by Gary Leff on April 16, 2018 link

The (at least most notable) good with some of my drop-in items)

Retention of three class transcon A321T service - wishing they had more than ten Flagship,First seats

Expansion of the longhaul Business product - selecting a true premium Super Diamond Solo business suite, rather than a BA-like trailing product (though much of this was serendipitous after the debacle of LAA staffers selecting a cheaper, skeletonized and failed Zodiac “Concept D” business suite)

Expanding, refreshing and adding Admirals Clubs, Flagship Lounges and Flagship First Dining

Adding Premium Economy to widebody aircraft (albeit trailing edge seats)

The mistakes

Paring back food and food quality (now recovering)

The bad

The “Oasis Project” (any desert and camel analogies here?} 737 MAX 8 / 7M8 and refitting of 737s and A320 family with the new microlavs and “More Sardines Throughout Coach” 30” Rockwell Collins Interior Design Meridian seating

D0 and the diminution of the ability to use those refurbished lounges lest one lose Bin space, upgrades, etc.

Recasting AA lowest fares as stripped down “Basic Economy” fares

Doug Parker (DP’s conversion?)

“No one is trying to take this company, the American Airlines brand, and turn it into US Airways. And I know that somehow that perception has come across, but it’s absolutely not true.

I told you the major objective..was to have a world class product. Trust me, US Airways never would have had Flagship lounges like we have now at American. They never would have had the kind of aircraft we have now at American. They wouldn’t have the sales force that we put in place at American. Our objective is to have a world class product, and it’s nothing like what US Airways had and it’s better than what American had. That’s where we want to go and that’s where we’re moving. I want to make sure there’s no mistake about that. Nothing about this merger was meant to be ‘oh let’s go take the American product and move to the US Airways product.’

To the contrary – and again there may have been some of that at the start, I’ll be honest about that. When we came in, I know, some of us came from US Airways thought ‘Oh gosh there’s some stuff American does you don’t really need to do and you still get the same amount of revenue.’ We found all that to be not the case because it’s such a different airline.

So indeed things like we came in early and took a bunch of meals out of airplanes, we’ve now gone and added back a lot more than either airline had before. Things like sales force, we came in and reduced a lot of the sales team, thinking US Airways didn’t have nearly as many as American we don’t need as many. We’ve now gone and added back a lot more than we ever had before. So to the extent that was true before, and I think it was overstated versus reality, it’s certainly not true now.

Our objective is to go have a world class product… I know it’s better than it was a few years ago, and it’s gonna get better over time.”

Last edited by JDiver; Apr 19, 2018 at 11:03 am
JDiver is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2018, 8:54 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Programs: DL 1 million, AA 1 mil, HH lapsed Diamond, Marriott Plat
Posts: 28,190
I will jump in and say that the argument strikes me as a little weak. The good (keeping 3-class service on ~18 321Ts) does not outweigh the bad (scrunching passengers on 300+ 738 and 7M8 and ripping out AVOD). Lounge investments? DL/AA/UA have those going on all the time. From the breathless descriptions one might expect a sliver of heaven, and the reality is a new pasta salad that's available 21 hours a week. Give me shower suites without wait at every airport that receives more than 4 AA redeyes.
3Cforme is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2018, 8:59 am
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: DFW/DAL
Programs: AA Lifetime PLT, AS MVPG, HH Diamond, NCL Platinum Plus, MSC Diamond
Posts: 21,422
"Premium airline" - Creating premium economy was a step in the right direction, however the implementation of that has not been good
It seems most FA's seem to regard this a economy with a better seat. For the amount of money AA wants to charge for this seating, passengers are going to want much more than a better than economy seat.
mvoight is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2018, 9:06 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Thousand Oaks, Ca., USA
Programs: AA Lifetime Plat; Bonvoy Titanium Lifetime Elite;Hyatt Globalist; HHonors Diamond; United Silver
Posts: 8,267
They are clueless. The food improved, then cut back again. FL improvements were done at the expense of regular Admirals Club (dramatically less space at LAX AC). Get a business class award on a partner, have to do the connecting flight in coach, maybe not even non stop. On a 737max.

Even CKs get stuck in the back sometimes.
beachfan is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2018, 9:13 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Austin
Programs: AA EXP +2MM- LT PLT! HH Diamond
Posts: 6,073
Let's just say I'm taking a "we'll see" attitude towards this..
JDiver, vudoosj, no1cub17 and 3 others like this.
teemuflyer is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2018, 9:33 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: DCA
Posts: 7,761
The difficulty here for me is that if their positioning is as 1) a premium airline and 2) a network airline, there is so much of their network that does not feel any of the effects of the supposed premiumization. Their focus on a select few hubs, international routes, and two domestic routes means that the vast bulk of their flights, on the vast bulk of their aircraft, even for their highest-value customers, will not feature any of these improvements.

Most transcons and long domestic routes are flown on LUS Airbus or LAA 737 aircraft, with very few widebodies in use and true business products rarely available. Transcon routes aside from the "sacred cows" of JFK-LAX/SFO do not receive lounge access or other perks in most instances. The economy is on fire, people are buying out premium products, and AA simply does not have any to offer for most of its flyers, even those who are willing to buy. As a simple personal example, I have DC-based colleagues on West-Coast travel projects who are loyal AA flyers but have gone elsewhere for their high-dollar J tickets because AA does not offer a true business product out of DC.

My opinion is that AA has not created a premium airline; it has created a two-tiered airline, one of haves (JFK-LAX/SFO, Europe/Asia) and have nots (most domestic, LATAM, other). I think that if AA wants to strengthen its position, it needs to think about the offerings that it is giving to the bulk of its network. I realize that to the extent that this is equipment-based it is not a quick fix, but it should be considered in the long term strategy.
ashill, brewdog11, jtav559 and 4 others like this.
arlflyer is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2018, 9:37 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,107
Originally Posted by teemuflyer
Let's just say I'm taking a "we'll see" attitude towards this..
This.

Things like this take planning and you cant just miracle it into existence, so well see is a good approach to take.

I have a feeling it is just another smoke filled speech in the dog and pony show, but well see.
thunderlounge is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2018, 10:11 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Programs: AA EP
Posts: 2,203
I actually do believe that Doug Parker has come around. The problem is that people like Isolm and Kirby (When at AA) dont/never saw this and took the airline towards the US model.

And their underlings still dont get (and probably dont have the budget for it)
AAExecPlatFlier is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2018, 10:12 am
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
Programs: BAEC Gold, Delta Platinum, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Gold, AMEX Platinum (US)
Posts: 18,485
Originally Posted by beachfan
Even CKs get stuck in the back sometimes.
Is there a problem with that? (Outside of lazy GAs who can't be bothered to process upgrades)
Fraser is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2018, 10:21 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Programs: AA EXP, Hilton Honors Gold, National Executive Elite
Posts: 406
Originally Posted by arlflyer
The difficulty here for me is that if their positioning is as 1) a premium airline and 2) a network airline, there is so much of their network that does not feel any of the effects of the supposed premiumization. Their focus on a select few hubs, international routes, and two domestic routes means that the vast bulk of their flights, on the vast bulk of their aircraft, even for their highest-value customers, will not feature any of these improvements.

Most transcons and long domestic routes are flown on LUS Airbus or LAA 737 aircraft, with very few widebodies in use and true business products rarely available. Transcon routes aside from the "sacred cows" of JFK-LAX/SFO do not receive lounge access or other perks in most instances. The economy is on fire, people are buying out premium products, and AA simply does not have any to offer for most of its flyers, even those who are willing to buy. As a simple personal example, I have DC-based colleagues on West-Coast travel projects who are loyal AA flyers but have gone elsewhere for their high-dollar J tickets because AA does not offer a true business product out of DC.

My opinion is that AA has not created a premium airline; it has created a two-tiered airline, one of haves (JFK-LAX/SFO, Europe/Asia) and have nots (most domestic, LATAM, other). I think that if AA wants to strengthen its position, it needs to think about the offerings that it is giving to the bulk of its network. I realize that to the extent that this is equipment-based it is not a quick fix, but it should be considered in the long term strategy.
I come to this forum from LUS. My impression is that Doug Parker has always tried to be different things to different people. Provide a high end experience to the high dollar (mostly business) customers and low cost to the budget conscious customers.
Another part of his approach is to avoid aggressively competing where he can win/dominate (thus the current draw down in JFK/NYC).
All that is new is that he is recognizing new areas that they can and must offer products in; mostly in the realm of high end luxury service
ashill and superweak like this.
travellerK is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2018, 10:30 am
  #11  
dll
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: LAX
Programs: AA Gold (prev. Ex Plat for 10 years); DL Plat; UA Gold; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 2,337
This mirrors my experience with AA. They've been doing a good job, from this traveler's perspective, differentiating where it matters the most to me (longhaul international cabins and the associated products, ground and air).

Their domestic product still has me a little

Has Doug been on the LUS A320, A319? How about the MADMAX?

I had a separate post on this and stand by it: I think AA is the best US-based longhaul carrier. If they can bring some more consistency and premium appeal to their domestic ops they'll definitely stand apart from WN, DL, UA. I'm not sure they're as compelled to be competitive in the domestic market, though.
dll is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2018, 10:43 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: PHX, SEA
Programs: DL Silver, Avis President's Club, Hertz President's Circle, Global Entry (Former AA Plt/Gold)
Posts: 4,417
Sure AA, you keep saying words like "premium" to fool investors, but there are still reports on FT about inconsistent PDBs as a pretty basic thing they manage to mess up regularly.

I will say, the Flagship lounge in LAX is absolutely stunning and fantastic (I was just there a few weeks ago) but then my LAX-PHX Southwest flight was more comfortable than an AA 737 in Y, and I haven't even experienced the torture of a "MAX" configuration yet.
Gig103 is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2018, 10:51 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Austin, TX - AUS
Programs: AA Platinum, Hilton, Hyatt, IHG, Marriott
Posts: 1,622
AA is only premium in:
1) First and business class on long haul flights, and JFK-LAX/SFO (which a small minority of its customers experience)
2) Airfares
Austin787 is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2018, 10:54 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: The FT AA forum, until it no longer wants me.
Programs: CK or bust
Posts: 1,913
Originally Posted by JDiver
The Oasis Project (any desert and camel analogies here?} 747 MAX 8 and refitting of 737s and A320 ...
747's with the high density MAX 8 retrofits. Now that is indeed a BA-style move!
JDiver, RoyalSwazi and oopl like this.
enpremiere is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2018, 11:04 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: DCA
Posts: 7,761
Originally Posted by travellerK
All that is new is that he is recognizing new areas that they can and must offer products in; mostly in the realm of high end luxury service
I think we are in agreement; however my point was the issue for a hub-and-spoke network carrier is that if that service is not end-to-end then the customer feels the lowest common denominator.

If a $100k/year CK gets off a fancy $8k J flight from Europe or Asia and steps onto a ratty old LUS/LAA narrowbody for a 3-hour flight to their home airport, on which they don't get a PDB, a decent meal, or anything resembling service, sit waiting for a gate for an hour, and have their work laptop die because there is no place to charge it, what experience will be most proximate in that customer's mind? The weak link isn't the big-ticket stuff on which management has been focusing, it's the many, many domestic flights that comprise the bulk of the passenger experience
Gig103 likes this.
arlflyer is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.