Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > American Airlines | AAdvantage
Reload this Page >

My Colleague Was Bumped from Upgraded F Seat by a Celeb

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

My Colleague Was Bumped from Upgraded F Seat by a Celeb

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2017, 4:18 pm
  #61  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 27,227
Originally Posted by USFlyerUS
Am I the only one who has no idea who this is?
That says more about your internet abilities than Mr. Sanders' "celebrity". Just look it up already.
ijgordon is online now  
Old Dec 16, 2017, 4:33 pm
  #62  
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Programs: AA, DL, Avis, Enterprise, National, IHG, HH, SPG/MR
Posts: 1,852
Originally Posted by USFlyerUS
Am I the only one who has no idea who this is?
Probably. But it’s rather irrelevant who he is.
kb9522 is offline  
Old Dec 16, 2017, 4:33 pm
  #63  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 17,428
Originally Posted by grrizzli
Sorry, Mr. Sanders. You're still not famous enough to call yourself a celebrity.
Did he call himself a celebrity?
Not famous enough. Well, I suppose if you don't follow sports.
Here's a short CV from Wikipedia:Oh and he played Major League Baseball too.

An outfielder in baseball, he played professionally for the New York Yankees, the Atlanta Braves, the Cincinnati Reds and the San Francisco Giants, and participated in the 1992 World Series with the Braves
​​​​Of course, all that was in the 1990's, but the fact is he's all over Sports TV these days.
Pretty famous guy. I certainly recognize Deion Sanders.
Then again, I wouldn't recognize Placido Domingo, even though I know who he is.
rickg523 is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2017, 5:58 am
  #64  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: MIA/LAS
Programs: AA Platinum, Hilton Gold, Starwood PLT
Posts: 572
Originally Posted by fly747first
I can understand your colleague's disappointment but in the end, he was on a free upgrade. My guess is that the celebrity was on a paid F ticket.
It’s not a feee upgrade. He wasn’t granted CK status out of the blue, he earned that, along with the perks that come with it.
Panamajon513 is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2017, 6:18 am
  #65  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Programs: DL 1 million, AA 1 mil, HH lapsed Diamond, Marriott Plat
Posts: 28,190
Originally Posted by Panamajon513

It’s not a feee upgrade. He wasn’t granted CK status out of the blue, he earned that, along with the perks that come with it.
That's the sense of entitlement! He had a paid coach fare but he was due an F see due to status. Got it.
3Cforme is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2017, 7:31 am
  #66  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: QDF
Programs: AA EXP (2MM), Marriott Tit
Posts: 1,036
Does AA have contracts that guarantee F (or J) availability? If so, it's possible that the NFL (and thus NFL Network) have one.
PlatinumScum is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2017, 7:57 am
  #67  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: AA Executive Platinum/Million Miler, Marriott Titanium Elite-Lifetime, Hilton Gold
Posts: 3,200
Originally Posted by ijgordon
That says more about your internet abilities than Mr. Sanders' "celebrity". Just look it up already.
I did. I'm just saying I didn't know him before I looked him up.
USFlyerUS is online now  
Old Dec 17, 2017, 7:59 am
  #68  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: (AA EXP)
Posts: 609
NFL Referees fly on full fare F tickets (sat next to one after a game). I know there are other corporate contracts for F/J availability, but not sure how they are worked when flights are already full.

BTW, I was bounced out of a business class seat from Kingston, Jamaica to Miami for Sinbad (comedian) nearly 20 years ago. He is a physically big guy!
MIAFlyer is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2017, 10:50 am
  #69  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Thousand Oaks, Ca., USA
Programs: AA Lifetime Plat; Bonvoy Titanium Lifetime Elite;Hyatt Globalist; HHonors Diamond; United Silver
Posts: 8,311
Originally Posted by 3Cforme
That's the sense of entitlement! He had a paid coach fare but he was due an F see due to status. Got it.
The entitlement comes from having a boarding pass with the seat and being seated in it. He got that seat by paying many $ to AA over the course of the prior year.

It's the idea that once boarded and seated, AA could move them simply because someone would pay more money after the flight was boarded.

Last edited by beachfan; Dec 17, 2017 at 12:00 pm
beachfan is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2017, 11:06 am
  #70  
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: LAX
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 179
This is definitely an interesting thread. As an EXP, I wouldn't be thrilled with this situation, but would live with it if they put me into an MCE window or aisle seat. However, I'm curious to know what everyone would do in the event that you select an exit row seat, get upgraded at T-24, and then get bumped during boarding back to Y in a middle (non-MCE) seat since all MCE seats were taken. I would not be ok if that were to happen, especially on a longer flight.
ijgordon likes this.
dciolli is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2017, 12:40 pm
  #71  
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Programs: AA, DL, Avis, Enterprise, National, IHG, HH, SPG/MR
Posts: 1,852
Originally Posted by beachfan
The entitlement comes from having a boarding pass with the seat and being seated in it. He got that seat by paying many $ to AA over the course of the prior year.

It's the idea that once boarded and seated, AA could move them simply because someone would pay more money after the flight was boarded.
Absolute nonsense. He got from A to B on the fares he paid in the past. Not one penny of that money was for a guaranteed F seat down the road

What an outrageous sense of entitlement...
kb9522 is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2017, 1:50 pm
  #72  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: South Florida
Programs: AA EXP, HH Diamond, Marriott Platinium
Posts: 1,334
That case was an oversold situation (or last minute sale) and they handled that way in order to avoid paying the pax for the downgrade or any IDB fees. Per COC seat is not guarantee but per DOT same class it is. It doesn't matter if the seat was complimentary, revenue or paid with miles (considered $0 for AA) still a confirmed seat and on those situations (oversold), AA may call you to offer you $300 for a downgrade and there are a couple of report about that. I got 5k for a non-working IFE on a 3hrs flights, so 7.5k for downgrade is not enough and those who said your friend didn't pay for that seat, they are just jealous of your status (probably PLT or lower).

Just my 2 cents
fedechat is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2017, 1:52 pm
  #73  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: DCA
Posts: 7,769
Originally Posted by kb9522


Absolute nonsense. He got from A to B on the fares he paid in the past. Not one penny of that money was for a guaranteed F seat down the road

What an outrageous sense of entitlement...
So why doesn't AA remove upgrades from its program? They're making representations that this is a feature of the program. Why do you think AA is making these representations, and why do you think AA maintains this program? Do you not believe that it drives incremental revenue? Is it not AA itself that is fostering this "outrageous entitlement"?

Why, then, doesn't AA just gut the program, say zero chance of upgrades, and send all of these "entitled" people to its competitors?

The people who make these kinds of statements about a one-off situation in the context of a loyalty relationship don't understand customers or marketing. A CK at ~$50k/year - what do you figure the CLV is on that customer? And you're really going to slap them in the face? I don't want you running my marketing program, that's for sure.
arlflyer is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2017, 2:17 pm
  #74  
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Programs: AA, DL, Avis, Enterprise, National, IHG, HH, SPG/MR
Posts: 1,852
Originally Posted by arlflyer
So why doesn't AA remove upgrades from its program?
They should remove this offering because people are ignorant about the conditions? Should they also just stop carrying people and luggage for the same reason?

They're making representations that this is a feature of the program. Why do you think AA is making these representations, and why do you think AA maintains this program? Do you not believe that it drives incremental revenue? Is it not AA itself that is fostering this "outrageous entitlement"?
Those representations are still subject to the rules both parties have agreed to. The rules don’t go away just because you or I don’t like them.

Why, then, doesn't AA just gut the program, say zero chance of upgrades, and send all of these "entitled" people to its competitors?
Why should AA have to pay the consequences for the ignorance of its customers?

The people who make these kinds of statements about a one-off situation in the context of a loyalty relationship don't understand customers or marketing. A CK at ~$50k/year - what do you figure the CLV is on that customer? And you're really going to slap them in the face? I don't want you running my marketing program, that's for sure.
I don’t work for AA’s marketing team, I don’t have the burden of having to sugarcoat things to avoid hurting fragile egos.


kb9522 is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2017, 2:24 pm
  #75  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: DCA
Posts: 7,769
Originally Posted by kb9522
Why should AA have to pay the consequences for the ignorance of its customers?...I don’t work for AA’s marketing team, I don’t have the burden of having to sugarcoat things to avoid hurting fragile egos.

And therein lies the problem. Those pesky customers and their ignorance! We'll teach them a lesson, now won't we?!

People approach these things like matters of law. Oh, the CoC, let's wave that in everyone's face and pound the table; that'll show 'em. I rest my case, blah blah blah. Yeah, you win the battle, but have you lost the war? The $1M lifetime value CK walks - you're proud and list this on your CV, I'm sure. Mr. Parker gives you a promotion?

But these aren't legal problems, they are indeed marketing problems - a discipline which in fact addresses more than "sugarcoating" to avoid damaging "fragile egos". And they are, unfortunately for your bull-in-a-china-shop black-and-white worldview, more nuanced than the prosecutorial mindset you advance can support. AA's business isn't to uphold a legal standard passed down in its CoC, it's to maximize return for its shareholders. Doing so is a balancing act. And, given the resources placed on the AAdvantage program, likely supported by data which you and I are not privy to, I suspect that they believe said program, and its explicit and implied benefits, to be valuable. So, go ahead, off with your best customers' heads, it's just marketing after all. Maybe that flies in your lines of work, but not many others.

If it were me? "Mr. Sanders, I'm so sorry, but this flight is pushing back full. May we escort you to the Flagship Lounge while we arrange for the next flight out in an hour?"
arlflyer is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.