Community
Wiki Posts
Search

FA Requirements Questions (A321)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 12, 2017, 12:49 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: BNA and FLL
Programs: National Executive Elite, IHG Diamond Elite, Hilton Gold, SW A List, Marriott Gold
Posts: 964
FA Requirements Questions (A321)

Currently sitting in row 11 (exit row) awaiting takeoff on an A321. No flight attendants ever came by to ask any of the exit row pax if they are willing and able to assist.

Also, the FA jumpseat that is right in front of me in this row, (which has a sticker on it that says seat must be occupied for taxi takeoff and landing), is not occupied by a FA. It always has been on my previous flights.

Should I report to AA about the FAs not asking pax if willing and able to assist? What about the jump seat?
MSP_Monopoly is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2017, 12:52 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Aspen, CO
Posts: 792
Did they ask you at the gate if you'd be willing and able to help in event of an emergency? This definitely seems fishy and someone should definitely have said something... Report it!!! Imagine if something were to go wrong...
Gino Troian is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2017, 1:17 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: lax
Posts: 3,887
Which flight is this?
skylady is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2017, 1:35 pm
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: HH Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 10,458
Definitely let AA Customer Service know. There is supposed to be a FA sitting in that seat with no exit row questions asked.
formeraa is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2017, 5:01 pm
  #5  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: BNA and FLL
Programs: National Executive Elite, IHG Diamond Elite, Hilton Gold, SW A List, Marriott Gold
Posts: 964
They asked when they scanned my boarding pass if I was willing and able. So that makes me feel a little better.

Oh, and the FA showed up to sit in the jump seat as we were making our turn onto the active runway for takeoff.

She then proceeded to change out her shoes upon landing literally as we were about to touch down. Talk about a distraction and a trip hazard, had something gone wrong on landing.
MSP_Monopoly is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2017, 6:07 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC, USA
Programs: AA EXP 3MM, Lifetime Platinum, Marriott Titanium, HH Gold
Posts: 10,967
I believe that the EGRs (Electronic Gate Readers) are now programmed to require exit row boarding passes to be scanned TWICE, in order to prompt the GA to ask the "willing and able?" question.
ESpen36 is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2017, 6:33 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Programs: AA Gold, Enterprise PLT, Marriott Gold
Posts: 604
It is a little odd that they forgot to ask you all that when sitting on the plane. That being said, if the GA asked you prior to boarding, and the FA was sitting in the seat before take-off, I really don't see the need to report them. Perhaps they got side tracked and didn't realize they forgot to ask. There is a reason they ask when boarding at the gate (if not at check-in if they see it)

Seems a mountain made out of a molehill to me to be honest.
SpinOn2 is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2017, 7:02 pm
  #8  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Since it's a safety thing, the time to have dealt with this was onboard and prior to departure. Or it's not that big a deal and time to move on.
Often1 is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2017, 7:04 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: lax
Posts: 3,887
So glad you asked here first before sending in your letter!
skylady is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2017, 7:32 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PHX
Programs: AA Gold, WN A+ & CP, HH Diamond, Hyatt Platinum, National Executive Elite
Posts: 3,246
Originally Posted by MSP_Monopoly
Oh, and the FA showed up to sit in the jump seat as we were making our turn onto the active runway for takeoff.
Well will you look at that? Much ado about nothing.

Originally Posted by MSP_Monopoly
She then proceeded to change out her shoes upon landing literally as we were about to touch down. Talk about a distraction and a trip hazard, had something gone wrong on landing.
Had something gone wrong on landing, her changing her shoes and where they were would probably be the least of your problems.
nancypants likes this.
justhere is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2017, 10:22 pm
  #11  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: BNA and FLL
Programs: National Executive Elite, IHG Diamond Elite, Hilton Gold, SW A List, Marriott Gold
Posts: 964
Originally Posted by justhere
Well will you look at that? Much ado about nothing.


Had something gone wrong on landing, her changing her shoes and where they were would probably be the least of your problems.
1. She still was violating the rules. She should have been in the seat for taxi. So, not much ado about nothing.

2. It's a double standard. The FAs throw a fit about bags, straps etc in the exit path yet they can do whatever they want with their stuff and have it be a hazzard.
MSP_Monopoly is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2017, 10:23 pm
  #12  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: BNA and FLL
Programs: National Executive Elite, IHG Diamond Elite, Hilton Gold, SW A List, Marriott Gold
Posts: 964
Originally Posted by ESpen36
I believe that the EGRs (Electronic Gate Readers) are now programmed to require exit row boarding passes to be scanned TWICE, in order to prompt the GA to ask the "willing and able?" question.
You don't have to scan it twice, but it does pop up a huge alert on their screen asking if customer is willing and able to assist and then the gate agent has to hit Enter or something to dismiss/acknowledge the alert message.
MSP_Monopoly is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2017, 8:55 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PHX
Programs: AA Gold, WN A+ & CP, HH Diamond, Hyatt Platinum, National Executive Elite
Posts: 3,246
Originally Posted by MSP_Monopoly
1. She still was violating the rules. She should have been in the seat for taxi. So, not much ado about nothing.

2. It's a double standard. The FAs throw a fit about bags, straps etc in the exit path yet they can do whatever they want with their stuff and have it be a hazzard.
1. I doubt she was, no matter what you think that sticker means. You need to reference the FAR's to determine if she was violating any rules and the FAR's allow her to be up during taxi. So yes, much ado about nothing.

2. I didn't say it wasn't a double standard. Just pointing out that I wouldn't worry about a pair of shoes being an issue in an emergency.
nancypants likes this.
justhere is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2019, 7:26 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,159
Originally Posted by justhere
1. I doubt she was, no matter what you think that sticker means. You need to reference the FAR's to determine if she was violating any rules and the FAR's allow her to be up during taxi. So yes, much ado about nothing.
I had wondered about this too, sometimes seeing an empty jump seat during taxi. The "must be occupied" sign reads like a rule, but in effect it is a shorthand reminder rather than the actual rule. So again a double standard, where pax are required to "obey all posted placards" but FAs are not. I found some clarity in this document from 2001:
During taxi ... [FAs] must remain at their duty stations with safety belts and shoulder harnesses fastened except to perform duties related to the safety of the airplane and its occupants.
...
[For example] FAA said that picking up commissary items absolutely is a safety-related duty — part of ensuring a crashworthy environment. So flight attendants will not serve beverages during taxi but will pick up [paper cups and plastic glasses] during taxi within this regulatory framework.
nancypants and BWISkyGuy like this.
FlyingEgghead is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2019, 7:59 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PHX
Programs: AA Gold, WN A+ & CP, HH Diamond, Hyatt Platinum, National Executive Elite
Posts: 3,246
Originally Posted by FlyingEgghead
I had wondered about this too, sometimes seeing an empty jump seat during taxi. The "must be occupied" sign reads like a rule, but in effect it is a shorthand reminder rather than the actual rule. So again a double standard, where pax are required to "obey all posted placards" but FAs are not. I found some clarity in this document from 2001:
Not sure I would call that a double standard. Lots of businesses have signs that effectively say "customer = no, employee = yes". Or vice versa.
nancypants likes this.
justhere is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.