Baby Stroller Incident on AA591 SFO>DFW April 21st
#166
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2006
Programs: AAdvantage PP
Posts: 13,913
The A/C has no closets forward so I'm assuming its a LUS a/c, likely a 321. LUS are now flying multiple former LAA routes. The crew I assume might be either PHX or CLT based.
#167
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: DAL
Posts: 1,446
Don't you read what people have posted or any of the articles linked?
Supposedly the stroller folds up into a legal size bag that can be put in the overhead bin. Supposedly she showed it to a different FA/GA and that FA/GA said it was ok for her to do so unless the bin space is full then she would have to gate check it.
Supposedly the stroller folds up into a legal size bag that can be put in the overhead bin. Supposedly she showed it to a different FA/GA and that FA/GA said it was ok for her to do so unless the bin space is full then she would have to gate check it.
I see an out of control crew, ga and passengers in the videos but no stroller as described.
#168
Join Date: May 2012
Location: HNL
Programs: AA PP 1.8MM, PC Spire, Hertz 5*, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 1,030
<Added>
Also, we don't know if it was a double stroller. No one has stated it is a double stroller, that is your guess. You can carry one baby while having the other in the stroller. I've done it many times.
Last edited by nutwpinut; Apr 22, 2017 at 10:44 am Reason: added double stroller info
#169
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,425
For that matter, look how many posts there are about "everyone knows strollers don't fit", ignoring earlier posts showing strollers that do fit. The reddit post quoted above, if true, includes that the stroller in question fit and that a prior GA authorized bringing it onboard (see https://www.reddit.com/r/Dallas/comm...ently/dglqjco/).
#170
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SFO
Programs: A few here and there
Posts: 207
This genuinely makes me curious. If an F/A or other flight crew commanded you to do something that would put you, them or the other passengers in harm's way, do you have to comply?
#171
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta but Washington DC will always be home.
Programs: Marriott LTP, Hilton Diamond, Accor Gold, Hyatt Explorist,, Delta Plat,
Posts: 2,070
I'm amazed that anyone here is attacking the passenger (the mother) here. So she brings a stroller on the plane. Now there are conflicting reports on whether she was told she could...but in the end, that doesn't matter.
What should have happened is a reasoned discussion, just telling the woman she couldn't keep the stroller, but we'll assist you in getting settled with your kids and then we'll get the stroller so it comes back to you at the door to the plane in Dallas. (Local reports in DC say the woman was from South America, perhaps find someone that speaks Spanish if a language barrier -
we don't know if there was.) What did happen according to every passenger who has been interviewed, is the male FA ripped the stroller from the mom, hitting her and barely missing hitting the infant. Presumably, given his attitude, he was also rude to the mother.
Like I said, I don't know how anyone can blame this on the mother. So, because she brought a stroller on the plane the airline has the right to treat her rudely and physically and verbally assault her? Obviously, the situation was bad enough that multiple passengers stood up for her. What should she say, "I'm so sorry I tried to bring my stroller on the plane. Thank you for hitting me and nearly hitting my infant. I've learned the error of my ways?"
And, the first class pax that stood up for her, I'm glad he did so. He didn't directly threaten the crew. He stated that if the FA tried that with him, he'd flatten him. He also tried to get the FAs name, did you notice that no one gave it to him, and the FA in question had removed his nametag? Seems to me, crew knew the FA was in the wrong and were trying to circle the airline industry's version of the "Thin Blue Line." It's the FA that escalated by charging the PAX and challenging him to a fight. Obviously, multiple passengers were troubled that the mother was physically assaulted and the infant nearly so.
This flight attendant has no business being in a customer facing position. I mean seriously, trying to fight a customer?
I'm glad that passengers are no longer "sitting there and taking it." Do we have to follow crewmember instructions? Yes, but not unconditionally. How many times have all of you encountered crews that make up rules to suit them, or treat pax in a completely unacceptable manner? I'm glad passengers are realizing they do have power in these situations.
AA did the right thing. Apologize unconditionally, show they are taking the situation seriously by taking care of the passenger and suspending the flight attendant. Because of AA's reaction I imagine this will die off the news very quickly in comparison to UA's Dr. Dao incident.
What should have happened is a reasoned discussion, just telling the woman she couldn't keep the stroller, but we'll assist you in getting settled with your kids and then we'll get the stroller so it comes back to you at the door to the plane in Dallas. (Local reports in DC say the woman was from South America, perhaps find someone that speaks Spanish if a language barrier -
we don't know if there was.) What did happen according to every passenger who has been interviewed, is the male FA ripped the stroller from the mom, hitting her and barely missing hitting the infant. Presumably, given his attitude, he was also rude to the mother.
Like I said, I don't know how anyone can blame this on the mother. So, because she brought a stroller on the plane the airline has the right to treat her rudely and physically and verbally assault her? Obviously, the situation was bad enough that multiple passengers stood up for her. What should she say, "I'm so sorry I tried to bring my stroller on the plane. Thank you for hitting me and nearly hitting my infant. I've learned the error of my ways?"
And, the first class pax that stood up for her, I'm glad he did so. He didn't directly threaten the crew. He stated that if the FA tried that with him, he'd flatten him. He also tried to get the FAs name, did you notice that no one gave it to him, and the FA in question had removed his nametag? Seems to me, crew knew the FA was in the wrong and were trying to circle the airline industry's version of the "Thin Blue Line." It's the FA that escalated by charging the PAX and challenging him to a fight. Obviously, multiple passengers were troubled that the mother was physically assaulted and the infant nearly so.
This flight attendant has no business being in a customer facing position. I mean seriously, trying to fight a customer?
I'm glad that passengers are no longer "sitting there and taking it." Do we have to follow crewmember instructions? Yes, but not unconditionally. How many times have all of you encountered crews that make up rules to suit them, or treat pax in a completely unacceptable manner? I'm glad passengers are realizing they do have power in these situations.
AA did the right thing. Apologize unconditionally, show they are taking the situation seriously by taking care of the passenger and suspending the flight attendant. Because of AA's reaction I imagine this will die off the news very quickly in comparison to UA's Dr. Dao incident.
#172
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,172
Are the FAs there to maintain order? Or to disrupt it? How extraordinary!
#173
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 226
OK. Here is my 2 cents:
1. Mom is overloaded with a way too large back pack. She needs to understand that now she has a child she can no longer be a "foot loose free spirit"!
2. Mom began crying INSTANTLY--the mother is a spoiled rotten child in and of her own Self!
3. She looks like she immediately began "protesting" exactly like a spoiled child does--she is looking around for some place to put the stroller so "it will be ok". Rather than having a conversation with the employee to reach a negotiated resolution.
IMHO--mom and baby should have been put off the airplane to re-consider growing up!
1. Mom is overloaded with a way too large back pack. She needs to understand that now she has a child she can no longer be a "foot loose free spirit"!
2. Mom began crying INSTANTLY--the mother is a spoiled rotten child in and of her own Self!
3. She looks like she immediately began "protesting" exactly like a spoiled child does--she is looking around for some place to put the stroller so "it will be ok". Rather than having a conversation with the employee to reach a negotiated resolution.
IMHO--mom and baby should have been put off the airplane to re-consider growing up!
#174
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: DAL
Posts: 1,446
That's a better way to say it. The way you posted before, you disregarded it all completely.
<Added>
Also, we don't know if it was a double stroller. No one has stated it is a double stroller, that is your guess. You can carry one baby while having the other in the stroller. I've done it many times.
<Added>
Also, we don't know if it was a double stroller. No one has stated it is a double stroller, that is your guess. You can carry one baby while having the other in the stroller. I've done it many times.
Most strollers designed for overhead bins are too large for AA dimensions. No one has posted a video or mentioned a model so it is all speculation the stroller was designed to fit in the overhead bin.
#175
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: DAL
Posts: 1,446
OK. Here is my 2 cents:
1. Mom is overloaded with a way too large back pack. She needs to understand that now she has a child she can no longer be a "foot loose free spirit"!
2. Mom began crying INSTANTLY--the mother is a spoiled rotten child in and of her own Self!
3. She looks like she immediately began "protesting" exactly like a spoiled child does--she is looking around for some place to put the stroller so "it will be ok". Rather than having a conversation with the employee to reach a negotiated resolution.
IMHO--mom and baby should have been put off the airplane to re-consider growing up!
1. Mom is overloaded with a way too large back pack. She needs to understand that now she has a child she can no longer be a "foot loose free spirit"!
2. Mom began crying INSTANTLY--the mother is a spoiled rotten child in and of her own Self!
3. She looks like she immediately began "protesting" exactly like a spoiled child does--she is looking around for some place to put the stroller so "it will be ok". Rather than having a conversation with the employee to reach a negotiated resolution.
IMHO--mom and baby should have been put off the airplane to re-consider growing up!
#176
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL
Programs: American Airlines
Posts: 29,972
Unfortunately way beyond the SOW of American airlines (AA,UA,DL etc) these days. There is no more customer service anymore.
#177
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,849
415(1) PC:
Any of the following persons shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail for a period of not more than 90 days, a fine of not more than four hundred dollars ($400), or both such imprisonment and fine:
(1) Any person who unlawfully fights in a public place or challenges another person in a public place to fight.
(1) Any person who unlawfully fights in a public place or challenges another person in a public place to fight.
#178
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL
Programs: American Airlines
Posts: 29,972
http://gbchildusa.com/products/pocki...tate=pg:2/ct:r
#179
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 61
An onboard witness has written the stroller was in fact able to be successfully stowed in the overhead by an FA.
#180
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 245
Unless you've seen a video I haven't, we don't know how long it took her to cry after the incident. It does seem likely that a flight attendant hit her. That justifies crying in my book.