Better Lounge or Longer Flight in J?
#1
Ambassador: Alaska Airlines
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: BWI
Posts: 7,390
Better Lounge or Longer Flight in J?
I have the option of flying in J from either JFK or CLT to Europe. CLT options are generally roughly an hour longer in the air, but CLT lounges are sucky at best whereas JFK has the newly renovated F lounge with significantly upgraded amenities (particularly food that would allow for abbreviated meal on board).
In your opinion - what would you value more if you have to pick one?
JFK flight is only a mere 7 hours in the air while CLT is close to 8.
In your opinion - what would you value more if you have to pick one?
JFK flight is only a mere 7 hours in the air while CLT is close to 8.
#2
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: AUS
Programs: BAEC Gold, AA PPro, Hyatt Globalist, Amex Plat
Posts: 7,029
I have the option of flying in J from either JFK or CLT to Europe. CLT options are generally roughly an hour longer in the air, but CLT lounges are sucky at best whereas JFK has the newly renovated F lounge with significantly upgraded amenities (particularly food that would allow for abbreviated meal on board).
In your opinion - what would you value more if you have to pick one?
JFK flight is only a mere 7 hours in the air while CLT is close to 8.
In your opinion - what would you value more if you have to pick one?
JFK flight is only a mere 7 hours in the air while CLT is close to 8.
IMHO, a one hour difference in flying time is not very significant to the decision.
Regards
#4
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: DCA
Programs: AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 947
I don't know your origin or destination, but assuming you're looking at a two-segment USA-JFK/CLT-EUR, I'd lean toward the CLT connection for two reasons:
1. Fewer ATC problems at CLT.
2. Another hour of potential sleep on the overnight flight.
That's unless you're starting from LAX or SFO, in which case I'd opt for JFK with the 321 Transcon birds versus ghetto PMUS 321s. Or just connect at LHR.
1. Fewer ATC problems at CLT.
2. Another hour of potential sleep on the overnight flight.
That's unless you're starting from LAX or SFO, in which case I'd opt for JFK with the 321 Transcon birds versus ghetto PMUS 321s. Or just connect at LHR.
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 27,222
If it's important to be productive upon landing in Europe, go for the flight that allows longer sleep. That would be CLT, even if it means eating dinner before boarding (at your own expense, or cobbling together something in the AC).
#8
Join Date: May 2012
Location: HNL
Programs: AA PP 1.8MM, PC Spire, Hertz 5*, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 1,030
Also, if you really want to visit a lounge, what about the trip back? Lounges in Europe are better than what you'd get in JFK AA terminal or CLT.
#9
Ambassador: Alaska Airlines
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: BWI
Posts: 7,390
For example, are you consistently qualifying for top tier and thus lounges aren't that big a deal to you at this point? Or is this going to be a rare "treat" to access an F lounge at JFK? Which hard product do you prefer for this route?
IMHO, a one hour difference in flying time is not very significant to the decision.
Regards
IMHO, a one hour difference in flying time is not very significant to the decision.
Regards
JFK will be on the 772 while CLT on 332/3 and I think the 772 hard product is slightly better, but both should be good for sleeping.
I probably will have a companion with me on this trip and I don't think he has ever been into an F lounge.
One other positive for CLT is it departs later in the day and gets into BCN a little past 11am while JFK gets in at 7am. I have found east coast to Europe to be a bit rough given the short flight and having to make sure I stay awake all day the first day.
I probably should just book something as I can cancel for free.
#10
Ambassador: Alaska Airlines
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: BWI
Posts: 7,390
Return trip most likely will be BCN-ORD... Not sure if IB lounges are anything to write home. BA does have award space via LHR but ~$500 in fuel surcharges each way. Kind of frustrating given r/t Y fares can be found for $500-600.
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 20,381
I will be using miles for this trip, so cost will be the same. Time wise almost identical, but slightly longer layover in JFK (4 hours vs 3 hours at CLT) as there is only one PIT-JFK flight. Total travel time is nearly identical as CLT-BCN is an hour longer but shorter layover.
One other positive for CLT is it departs later in the day and gets into BCN a little past 11am while JFK gets in at 7am. I have found east coast to Europe to be a bit rough given the short flight and having to make sure I stay awake all day the first day.
One other positive for CLT is it departs later in the day and gets into BCN a little past 11am while JFK gets in at 7am. I have found east coast to Europe to be a bit rough given the short flight and having to make sure I stay awake all day the first day.
Um, duh? Unless you want a run on those awards to choose your options for you?
#13
Moderator: American AAdvantage, Travel Safety/Security & Texas, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: AUS / GRK
Programs: AA, HHonors, Hertz
Posts: 13,484
JFK will be on the 772 while CLT on 332/3 and I think the 772 hard product is slightly better, but both should be good for sleeping.
I will be using miles for this trip, so cost will be the same. Time wise almost identical, but slightly longer layover in JFK (4 hours vs 3 hours at CLT) as there is only one PIT-JFK flight. Total travel time is nearly identical as CLT-BCN is an hour longer but shorter layover.
One other positive for CLT is it departs later in the day and gets into BCN a little past 11am while JFK gets in at 7am. I have found east coast to Europe to be a bit rough given the short flight and having to make sure I stay awake all day the first day.
I will be using miles for this trip, so cost will be the same. Time wise almost identical, but slightly longer layover in JFK (4 hours vs 3 hours at CLT) as there is only one PIT-JFK flight. Total travel time is nearly identical as CLT-BCN is an hour longer but shorter layover.
One other positive for CLT is it departs later in the day and gets into BCN a little past 11am while JFK gets in at 7am. I have found east coast to Europe to be a bit rough given the short flight and having to make sure I stay awake all day the first day.
While the seats may not be brand new, they are fine for the short flight to Europe.
Crews can be hit or miss either way. I've had some stellar crews from CLT to Europe, while some not so much.
The lounge at CLT (the small one has always been closed when I've been there, not sure if it has re-opened) is fine. Nothing to write home about, but you can get away, relax, and have some snacks. I'd recommend eating at Bojangles anyway (or there's a good local-ish place in the atrium), if you want real food.
As others have noted, the arrival time would make this a non-issue for me. I've arrived in Europe at 6-7am, gotten to hotels at 9am, and had to wait until 2-3pm for a room. The 11am arrival, with getting to hotel by 1pm makes this much more palatable for me. Go to hotel, probably get in room, shower, then get something to eat, explore a bit.
#14
Ambassador: Alaska Airlines
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: BWI
Posts: 7,390
I can't believe that the Flagship lounge in JFK would be the decisive factor compared to not dragging yourself around like a zombie your first day in Europe because you get in at 7 as opposed to 11 am (with less of an early checkin problem). We're not talking the Lufthansa First Class Terminal, the Emirates F lounges or a Cathay Pacific F lounge here. We're talking "serviceable lounge but nothing special" versus "less serviceable lounge". Your friend's a newbie, they'll be thrilled at free booze, snax and a lie-flat seat.
[/B].
[/B].
Also LAX-CLT award space will be a bit of a challenge as nothing is available on the nonstop or requires multiple connections whereas LAX-JFK is readily available in J, but I am not too hot about the 7am arrival.
#15
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: AA LT Gold
Posts: 3,644
LAX or PIT?